注册并分享邀请链接,可获得视频播放与邀请奖励。

Shaun Maguire
@shaunmmaguire
Partner @sequoia // @caltech physics PhD // Views are my own
加入 May 2010
1.7K 正在关注    388.3K 粉丝
There is a long history of ideas that seemed correct to globalist elites, but proved disastrous for the average American: “America should outsource its manufacturing to China” “America should open its borders to tens of millions of illegal immigrants because it’s humane and we need workers” “America should stop building nuclear power plants, stop fracking, prevent nat gas pipelines, and deindustrialize more broadly due to climate change” “Let’s have tacit quotas against hiring/promoting white men so that minorities can catch up” @PalmerLuckey has consistently shown extreme bravery in his willingness to take on unpopular topics
显示更多
Investors like Paul want the immigration debate to be strictly polar because it is the only way their traitorous ideas might seem reasonable. They paint one side as racist, backwards, economically illiterate absolutists and the other as enlightened, growth-minded cosmopolitian realists. Support for laws that protect American citizens can be dismissed as uneducated, anyone who hires immigrants or foreigners in any capacity a hypocrite. American law should, and does, advantage American citizens. We should not have to compete on an even playing field with billions of people who almost universally don't share our values or respect our institutions, even if they are "the most qualified" or willing to work double the hours for the same wages. The men running Operation Paperclip did not think Americans should have to compete with the entire Third World, they understood that a carefully controlled amount of highly-skilled expert immigration is net good for America even when allegience is in question. It is worth noting that even on a purely economic level, ignoring all burdens of loyalty or allegiance to your countrymen and treating America as nothing but an economic activity zone, it still doesn't make sense to say without qualification that foreigners should get any job where they are more qualified than their American counterpart. As just one easy example out of dozens, about 20% of immigrants return home after less than five years, taking all their savings and vested shares with them. Another 20% will leave within ten years, doing the same. All the while, they will wire, on average, ~15% of their wages out of the United States economy every month. Some occupations and origins average 30%! The idea that this should be completely ignored with regard to employment and immigration policy is rampant among the same people who tell you with a straight face that limits on immigrants will destroy the American economy, that the dumb rednecks need to be saved. I lean very libertarian and have strongly supported immigration to America for many years with countless public examples. That doesn't put me on the same side as the men who want to sell out America, and no amount of long-past accomplishment obliges any of us to listen to their lectures from the other side of the Atlantic.
显示更多
0
96
4.3K
354
转发到社区