注册并分享邀请链接,可获得视频播放与邀请奖励。

swyx
@swyx
achieve ambition with intentionality, intensity, integrity & insanity. affiliations: - @smol_ai - @dxtipshq - @cognition - @aidotengineer - @latentspacepod
加入 April 2009
3.9K 正在关注    181.3K 粉丝
among ai leaders i seem to be in the minority in that i am STILL actively using /loop and /goal.... ... and i think all of u guys who stopped using it are wrong - not wrong forever, just giving up on it too early in the g5.6/c5 era now you use it when: 1) you want the right mix of steerability and autonomy 2) you want open ended "loop that generates loops" type end state without deeply specifying path to get there heres an example of when having a goal on saved my ass in a very long action-reasonining turn
显示更多
Yesterday I cohosted a dinner with @dexhorthy with a wonderful group of founders, to talk about agent loops and loop engineering. Some interesting insights: * Most of our group was *not* actively using /loop in Codex/Claude Code * You can build long-running autonomous agent loops through multi-agent handoffs, event triggers, or….just stacks of cron jobs (?) * Almost everyone believes that no one will be reviewing code in 1-2 years. * The more interesting question is whether we’d be reviewing *anything* in 1-2 years. * AI is still a bit of a skill issue. Humans are responsible for maximizing AI output and reducing slopification. * Will human intellect provide alpha as models get better, or will the playing field be leveled? Most people think it will be leveled a bit, but there is a need for humans to provide alignment, guardrails, judgment, creativity. * The minimum amount of context you need for AI could be just the codebase with some documentation. Any research/plan files are for one-off tasks and not meant to be maintained. Having a self-organizing wiki is nice but adds complexity. If you missed this one, we’ll be hosting more dinners like this on a regular cadence! If you have thoughts on what we should talk about, let us know :) (e.g. continual learning, RL envs, competitive differentiation vs. Anthropic, etc.)
显示更多
0
17
31
1
转发到社区