註冊並分享邀請連結,可獲得影片播放與邀請獎勵。

檢索結果 经济学
经济学 貼吧
一個關鍵字就是一個貼吧,路徑全站唯一。
建立貼吧
用戶
未找到
包含 经济学 的搜尋結果
经济学家刘世锦:给1.8亿农民涨养老金 比大搞投资管用。
经济学家本来就不懂经济 经济学家的能力就是让别人觉得他懂经济 这就够了,自己懂不懂不重要 粉丝认为你懂,你就是真的懂! 就像董宇辉其实也没什么文化 但是他让文盲们觉得他有文化 这就是他的长处和盈利模式 李林老板请付鹏肯定是请对了 因为币圈人什么大风大浪没见过 大家天天在网上能和华人首富谈笑风生 一个经济学家来币圈根本找不到存在感 说白了经济学家在币圈人面前就是小丑 但是人家经济学家的粉丝可都是圈外人 俗称新鲜血液 这就是经济学家最大的价值 就好比孙哥如果今天叫别人买比特币 别人可能不信 但是付鹏要是开一场大会叫大家买比特币 那台下观众得咔咔刷卡,POS机都得刷冒烟 所以李林还是很有智慧的 要新鲜血液,就得请经济学家 盲猜一下: 接下来会有更多的经济学家进入行业 经济学家自身本不值钱,值钱的是新鲜血液 付鹏懂这一点,李老板更懂这一点
顯示更多
0
105
306
19
轉發到社區
麻省理工学院经济学教授、2024年诺贝尔经济学奖获得者达龙·阿西莫格鲁,其主要研究领域为宏观经济学、政治经济学、劳动经济学、发展经济学、经济理论。他有一篇研究中国经济的文章,标题就是《中国经济正从头部腐烂》。
顯示更多
0
85
1.2K
248
轉發到社區
拉曼大学经济学教授黄锦荣说,马来西亚超过80%的税收,其实来自T10与T20群体。 #星洲日报# #sinchew# 新闻链接:
典型的左派的经济学认知能力,只会从纳税人手里抢钱。从来不是什么开发资源,发展经济,做大蛋糕。
不知道首席经济学家的这段 AI 文章是有什么意义。 “预计2025年由众议院通过”,这话应该是免费版本的 AI 吧,大凡是花点钱的就会告诉你,众议院已经通过了,另外现在是 2026年 。 我大概知道首席的 X 是有人带运营的,但发这种东西,吃相还是难看了点。 而且顶个中文名发英文的内容两边不讨好。
顯示更多
The Clarity Act (to be passed by the House of Representatives in 2025, with the Senate still pushing forward) further categorizes digital assets into three types: Digital Commodities (such as Bitcoin and Ethereum), which are essentially tied to the functions of the blockchain system and are regulated by the CFTC; Investment Contract Assets (similar to securities), regulated by the SEC; and Permitted Payment Stablecoins, regulated by banks. This act will separate the previously attempted unified definition of attributes: stablecoins will primarily handle application-level payment/settlement functions (subject to strict reserve and redemption rules), while retaining the value store function as a crucial element of Bitcoin's value maintenance role, assuming the attributes of speculative assets and commodities, rather than everyday currency functions.
顯示更多
0
47
66
1
轉發到社區
马斯克揭秘经济学家不敢承认的真相:现有经济体系即将崩塌,且无力阻挡,物价会出现剧烈崩盘,而非小幅下跌。 AI与机器人正在打破传统经济学的稀缺性基础,生产呈指数级爆发,生产率大幅提升,这是彻底的替代而非渐进升级。 AI大幅降低人力与低效成本,商品边际成本趋近于零,品质却不断提升。 各国惯用的印钱放水政策,在物质极大丰裕的时代将彻底失效。传统经济模型依赖的劳动力、产出限制等前提,已被AI颠覆,GDP指标也失去意义。 此次通缩并非需求不足,而是供给近乎无限,政策永远赶不上生产爆发的速度。 未来权力将掌握在掌控高效生产系统的人手中,传统经济规则制定者,已无力应对这场颠覆性变革。
顯示更多
0
7
47
20
轉發到社區
马克思主义政治经济学对商品价值有个定义:凝结在商品中无差别的人类劳动。这个定义好理解但不好定价,在AI时代的token出来后就容易很多了,这就是token消耗量。
顯示更多
耶鲁大学经济学教授仅仅用1 小时,就把博弈论彻底讲透了。 可以收藏,反复观看!
0
85
8K
2.2K
轉發到社區
这份代币经济学的格局很大,希望背包能变得更好
In the Backpack tokenomics, we have one guiding principle. - Insiders "dumping on retail" should be impossible: no founder, executive, employee, or venture investor should receive wealth from the token until the product hits escape velocity. Of course it begs the question, what does it mean to "hit escape velocity". Every project is different, and it's impossible to generalize. For Backpack, the answer is clear: we want to IPO in the USA. Going public might happen quickly, it might happen not so quickly, and in fact, it might not happen at all. In any case, we're going for it. But before going public, we have to grow--a lot. The odd thing about Backpack's growth over the past year--and in fact one of the things that makes Backpack so different from basically every token project in crypto--is that, today, Backpack Exchange only serves about 48% of the world. We've been very slow, very intentional about opening up our product to the world, ensuring that we have every "i" dotted and ever "t" crossed as a regulated financial institution. Growth that sometimes feels like running with a parachute, but we are happy to take the long path, because it's precisely that parachute that will allow us to fly. For those that don't know us, the reason for this is simple. Backpack is trying to not only build great crypto products, but we're also trying to build great TradFi products. We're trying to not only give our users access to every crypto asset, every blockchain, and every decentralized application, but we're also getting banking rails around the world, USD client money accounts in the USA, EUR in the EU, JPY in Japan--every currency on every major payment network you can imagine. We're trying to build a great securities product, whether that's getting access to your favorite stocks in a traditional brokerage or bidding on primary shares of a company about to go public on NASDAQ. We want to serve not only retail users worldwide, but we want to serve regulated products for regulated counterparties and regulated institutions around the world. All of this takes an enormous amount of time, effort, blood, sweat, and tears. We've been working on this for over three years at this point, laying an international foundation for the company and for the product slowly but surely, brick by brick. If we're lucky, we'll spend a lifetime. What this all means is that, in the most literal sense--and I know this sounds silly--we're just getting started. We still have half the world to open up into. We still have some of our most exciting products to launch. And this leads to our next guiding principle in our tokenomics. - Liquid tokens should exclusively go to users, fueling growth triggered by key product milestones. Every time we open up a new region, every time we launch a new product, that's an opportunity to grow. Open up EU => grow. Open up Japan => grow. Open up the USA => grow. Open up predictions => grow. Open up stocks => grow. Open up card => grow. Like gasoline onto a fire, the token serves to continuously kickstart new markets in the same way points kickstarted Seasons 1-4. With every growth lever we pull, tokens unlock in a predictable way to users, bringing in a new wave of token holders, growing the community, and allowing the product to soar to new heights. The objective constraint for this to work is precise: the value of added growth created by new token unlocks must always be greater than the dilution of those unlocks. As long as that condition holds, we can continue to unlock tokens direct to our most active users, growing along the way. Last but not least is the question: Ok so if all the liquid tokens are going to users, then what about the team? How exactly do you remain incentive aligned while ensuring the team cannot unlock, dump on retail, and become enormously wealthy without building something great? And the answer is simple: not a single founder, executive, team member, or venture investor has been given a direct token allocation. The entire "team allocation" sits in a "corporate treasury", i.e. on the balance sheet of the Backpack company--locked until at least one year post IPO. The team owns equity in the company, and the company owns a large percent of the token supply. It's not until the company goes public (or has some other type of equity exit event), that the team can earn any wealth from the project. It's not until the company has access to the largest, most liquid capital markets in the world by going public--and it's not until the company has done all the hard work to earn access to those markets--that the team can reap the rewards of the value created by the Backpack community from now until then. We either go big, or we go home.
顯示更多