做菜日常 Daily cooking✌️ 喜歡打喜歡，不喜歡藏心裏☺️。 If you like it, say it, if you don't like it, just keep it in mind. Ps:隨意錄錄，又水了一則貼文，我真棒。 #肌肉##哥布林##做菜##日常#

你在海外想日常消费？ • 换汇？银行汇率差，还要排队 • 刷卡？境外卡经常被拒 • 现金？带太多不安全 MiPay 怎么做： USDT 直接扫码付，支持支付宝/微信 虚拟卡绑Apple Pay，秒扣款 0手续费，实时汇率 就这么简单。 Do you want to make daily purchases overseas? • Exchange currency? The bank exchange rate is poor and we have to queue up • Swipe a card? Overseas cards are often rejected • cash? It’s not safe to bring too much How to do MiPay: USDT can be paid directly by scanning the QR code, supporting Alipay/WeChat Bind the virtual card to Apple Pay and deduct money in seconds 0 handling fee, real-time exchange rate It's that simple.

在无畏的基础上再补充三个点： 1 在 @AethirCloud 跟币安的合约上线合同当中，罗卫宇 在 $ATH 代币层面的占比超过50% 2 之前百科提过， $ATH 的经济模型中的挖矿代币产出部分的比例，将从23%变为21%. 但实际情况是，挖矿这部分后面会直接缩减80%，打个比方：Aethir 矿机每天的产量将从100个 $ATH 缩减为 20 $ATH 3 最后，据知情人士透露，罗卫宇长期出入中国大陆。 1 In the contract trading pair listing agreement between @AETHIR and Binance, WeiYu Luo holds over 50% of the $ATH token share. 2 It was previously mentioned that the proportion of $ATH mining token output would decrease from 23% to 21%. But in reality, the mining output will be directly reduced by 80%. For example, the daily output of an Aethir mining machine will drop from 100 $ATH to 20 $ATH. 3 Lastly, according to insiders, WeiYu Luo frequently travels in and out of mainland China. 1 @AethirCloud 바이낸스의 계약 거래 쌍 상장 계약에서 뤄웨이위(罗卫宇)는 $ATH 토큰 지분에서 50% 이상을 보유하고 있습니다. 2 이전에 백과사전에서 $ATH의 채굴 토큰 산출 비율이 23%에서 21%로 감소할 것이라고 언급했지만, 실제로는 채굴 산출이 이후 80% 직접 축소될 것입니다. 예를 들어, Aethir 채굴기의 일일 산출량은 100 $ATH에서 20 $ATH로 줄어듭니다. 3 마지막으로, 내부 소식통에 따르면 뤄웨이위는 중국 본토를 자주 드나들고 있습니다. @HouseofChimera @andrewmoh @SidDegen @heungmangoo @VuoriTrading @0xLofty @DeFiTracer @TheCryptoYapper @wacy_time1 @AltCryptoGems @coinmuhendisi @Morecryptoonl @0xFinish @scribble_dao @intern_cripto @anshitaksoni @Bancrypto__ @Edward__Park @Coiniseasy @cryptocruise77 @tm_uchal @co_cobling @Hope_web3_ @munchanghw98379 @Bounty_ATM @Jongyun_s_korea @with_blockmedia @tokenpostkr @CoinNess_ @riyuexiaochu @monkeyjiang @liuxiaoling933 @leshka_eth @BTC_Alert_ @octopusycc @sjbtc9 @superogers1 @YeruiZhang @0xNathanWalk @ferdie_jhovie @liangxihuigui @xiaomucrypto @off_thetarget @_FORAB @Paris13Jeanne @cathy_que #aethir# #ath# #ivc# #罗卫宇# #dat#

杭州 IP 被封传言后，我才看懂：Claude Code 真正值钱的不只是 Claude 最近抖音上突然开始传一件事：Claude Code 把杭州的 IP 大面积封了。视频里的字幕很重，评论区更热闹，有人说“阿里注册了二十多万个账号”，也有人说“Anthropic 把整个杭州都封掉了”。我看到这个消息的真实反应其实很直接：身边用 Claude Code 的人，最近确实普遍反馈更容易遇到风控和封禁。这个体感不是空穴来风。 但我也没有因此立刻跟着骂 Anthropic。因为同一时间，我自己这边的体验又很反差：Codex 最近重置了两次，但整体还是挺香。我现在主力用的是 Codex 这边的额度池，调度方便，量大管饱。对一个每天真要靠 AI 干活的人来说，这种稳定感和余量感，比“哪个模型参数更强”还要现实。 先把事实边界说清楚 查完以后，我觉得这个热点最容易被讲偏。情绪很足，证据没跟上。截至 2026 年 6 月 30 日，我没有查到 Anthropic 针对杭州发布过城市级封禁公告。中国大陆本来就不在 Claude 官方支持地区列表里，所以有人无法登录、账号被风控，和“整个杭州被封”不是一回事。这个边界必须先说清楚，否则后面所有判断都会变成情绪消费。 如果你已经遇到 account on hold，可以先做一件很具体的事：点 Request a review，同时发一封简短英文申诉邮件。重点不要写阴谋论，也不要长篇解释，只讲三件事：我是正常用户，主要用途是什么，没有故意违规，请求人工复核。 英文申诉模板 Subject: Account Suspension Appeal - [your registered email] Hello Claude Support Team, I am writing to respectfully appeal the suspension or account hold on my Claude account ([your registered email]). I use Claude primarily for [briefly describe your use, such as work, learning, or coding], and I have tried to follow Anthropic's Terms of Service and Usage Policy. I did not intentionally violate any rules, so this may have been triggered by mistake. If I accidentally violated any policy, it was unintentional. I rely on Claude for my daily tasks and would appreciate a review of my account. [Optional, if applicable] I am an active Pro subscriber, and I value this service. Could you please review my account and help me restore access? Thank you for your time and assistance. Best regards, [your name] 但我顺着这条传言查下去，发现了另一件确定的事，而且比“杭州有没有被封”更值得讲。阿里云百炼的官方帮助中心，已经有一篇标题就叫《Claude Code》的接入文档。它不仅写了安装方式，还直接给出配置：把 ANTHROPIC_BASE_URL 指向百炼的兼容接口，再配置 Claude Code 的模型映射。保存以后，终端里照样运行 claude，但回答问题的后端可以换掉。 这里也要防止另一种夸张。它不是 Anthropic 和阿里云共同宣布的合作，更不能说 Claude Code 官方投奔了某个模型。准确的说法是：阿里云百炼利用 Claude Code 支持的环境变量和 Anthropic 兼容接口，给出了一套官方接入方案。Claude Code 这个交互外壳还在，但模型供应商可以被换掉。能确认到这里，就已经足够有意思。 你真正舍不得的不是某个模型 很多人以为自己离不开 Claude，其实舍不得的是已经形成的工作方式：让工具进入项目目录，读取上下文，修改文件，执行命令，调用 Skills，最后由人检查改动。用久以后，人依赖的已经不是某个聊天窗口，而是一套“我提目标，AI 读现场，AI 动手，人来验收”的工作节奏。模型质量当然会直接影响结果。但当后端可以替换，当 Codex 这种工具也能接住很大一部分工作量时，Claude Code 的价值就不再只由 Claude 模型决定。它更像一个工作台，模型是工作台下面的发动机。 这也解释了为什么“封号”会引发这么大的焦虑。很多人把账号、模型和工作流绑成了一件事。一旦账号出问题，积累的提示词、项目习惯和自动化流程仿佛都要跟着报废。更稳妥的做法，是从一开始就把它们分开：项目资料留在自己的目录里，Skills 和规则用可读文件保存，关键流程保留人工确认，同时准备至少一个兼容模型或替代工具。内容选题、草稿、同步脚本、发布包、复盘记录，这些都应该是你自己的资产，不应该长在某个模型账号上。账号会重置，额度会变化，模型会轮换，但你的工作流不能每次跟着归零。 OPC 最怕的不是换模型 对于做一人公司的我来说，这件事尤其现实。OPC 要的是一个人也能持续交付，没有人能保证永远押中最强模型。今天用 Claude，明天用 Codex，之后还会有新的选择。供应商会调整地区、价格和政策，个人控制不了这些变化。我们能控制自己的项目文件、任务规则、上下文资产和验收标准。只要这些东西能迁移，换工具就只是换入口，不用重新造一辆车。 围着“杭州到底封了多少个 IP”吵下去，最后很可能只剩一场真假难辨的情绪消费。更实际的问题是：如果明天 Claude 真的不能用了，你现在这套工作方式还能不能继续运行？如果答案是否定的，那你积累的可能只是一个账号的使用熟练度，还没有形成自己的 AI 生产系统。 AI 时代最危险的，不是某个模型封了你，而是离开某个模型，你就不会工作了。 END 参考资料 阿里云百炼：Claude Code 接入文档 Claude 官方支持地区列表 #AI# #AIAgent# @grok

周末阅读《币安人生》，翻到了 180-182页关于币安被盗 7000枚比特币(2019年5月8日)的经历，颇有共呜。 好巧不巧，在我加入 Trust Wallet 前一个月的圣诞节，插件钱包因为人为小过失，让骇客有机可乘。 @cz_binance 在情况还未被完全诊断清楚之前，率先发推转达Trust Wallet愿意赔偿。 调查后来发现：骇客通过恶意程序渗透了几名员工的电脑，在代码中植入了恶意指令。虽然管理助记词和私钥的核心安全组件并未被攻破，但插件钱包v2.68确实被植入了恶意代码，情况和2019年币安那次类似。在漏洞修复前的短短数小时内打开过插件钱包的用户受到了牵连。 时至今天，@TrustWallet 已加固安全揩施、每天活跃用户量不降反升，对受影响用户赔付进度也已完成95%。而对于已错过申请赔付最后限期的长尾用户，CZ 认为只要对方带著合理凭证，Trust Wallet 该继续受理，「做正确的事」。 Funds are SAFU，从不是一句口号，而是用行动写下的承诺。 Weekend reading Freedom of Money, I reached pages 180-182 about Binance’s May 8, 2019 hack where 7,000 BTC were stolen. It resonated with me. Coincidentally, one month before I joined Trust Wallet, the extension wallet was compromised during Christmas. CZ immediately tweeted that Trust Wallet would reimburse users, even before the issue was fully diagnosed. The investigation showed it was similar to 2019: hackers used malware to infect employee computers and injected malicious code into v2.68 (deprecated). The core seed phrase security was never breached — only users who opened the extension wallet in the few hours before the fix were affected. Today, Trust Wallet has strengthened security, daily active users are up, and 95% of affected users have been compensated. For the remaining vicitms who missed the deadline, CZ believes Trust Wallet should still accept claims with valid proof. Funds are SAFU — not just a slogan, but a promise backed by action.

#为什么是中国# #WhyChina# The Global Logic of China's Economic Growth in the First Half of 2026: A 4.7% GDP Increase 2026年上半年GDP增长4.7%：中国经济增长的全球逻辑 According to the latest semi-annual report, China's gross domestic product (GDP) reached 69.6 trillion yuan, representing a year-on-year increase of 4.7% at constant prices, in line with the annual growth target. Against a backdrop of intertwined international complexities and volatilities, China's economic performance is commendable. Yet, a closer look at the data reveals that the logic underpinning China's economic growth is being reshaped. (I) At the Industry Level, Notable Highlights Emerge: First, new quality productive forces are being cultivated and strengthened at an accelerated pace.** In the first half of the year, industrial production grew robustly. The value-added output of the equipment manufacturing sector increased by 9.3% year-on-year, and that of high-tech manufacturing grew by 13.3%, both outpacing the overall growth rate of industrial output above a designated scale. This underscores a clear trend toward a high-end, intelligent, green, and integrated industrial structure. Looking at specific products, the output of 3D printing equipment, lithium-ion batteries, industrial robots, and other products emblematic of new quality productive forces surged. The average daily token call volume has reached hundreds of trillions, showcasing the vitality and potential of the digital and intelligent economies. Second, new growth drivers are accelerating to take on a leading role. Preliminary estimates suggest that new growth drivers—encompassing high-end manufacturing, the digital economy, and modern services—contributed over 40% to economic growth in the first half of the year. The economy's distinct shift toward a higher quality and more optimized structure is evident, and this overall trend is accelerating. For instance, industries related to artificial intelligence, such as integrated circuit manufacturing and intelligent vehicle equipment manufacturing, have all maintained high growth rates exceeding 30%, vividly illustrating the pace of China's industrial upgrading. Third, confidence on the investment front is on the rise. In the first half of the year, investment in high-tech industries grew by 4.6% year-on-year. Notably, investment in the manufacturing of aircraft, spacecraft, and equipment, computer and office equipment manufacturing, and information services grew by 23.3%, 8.1%, and 15.5%, respectively. Investment structure best reflects market expectations. The increasing "new economy content" in investments signals an acceleration in the replacement of old growth drivers with new ones. Investment in intellectual property products grew by 9.4%, indicating that enterprises are placing greater emphasis on R&D and innovation. This suggests that technological advancement is not simply about capacity expansion but about qualitative change driven by innovation. (II) Observing a Major Economy Requires Looking Beyond the Immediate Figures to the Long-term Trajectory. Behind the "new economy content" of the semi-annual report lies China's ongoing transformation from a global manufacturing hub to a global center of innovation. At the 17th Annual Meeting of the New Champions (Summer Davos), observers noted a new phenomenon: a host of unicorn companies are heading to China. They are establishing R&D centers, regional headquarters, and deeply integrating into China's innovation and industrial chains—shifting from "produced in China" to "created in China." So, why China? Economist Justin Yifu Lin, in his book *Demystifying the Chinese Economy, touched upon the theory of the "speed of technological change." He argues that the essence of the industrial revolution is not just the application of new technologies, but more fundamentally, the ever-accelerating pace of technological change. Since the mid-18th century, starting with the steam engine reshaping the textile industry, the snowball of technological change has grown, rapidly sweeping through industries like chemicals and automobiles, ultimately redrawing the geographical map of great power competition. Looking at China today, the trajectory of accelerating technological change is equally clear. A leading enterprise can drive an entire industry, which in turn can boost a whole region. These burgeoning industrial clusters, growing from saplings to forests, not only enhance production efficiency and invigorate market vitality but also effectively improve development quality and resilience. For example, specialized and sophisticated "little giant" enterprises above a designated scale in Beijing, through deep cultivation of innovation chains, supply chain collaboration, and international expansion, have become "connecting points" and "accelerators" for the dual circulation strategy. More importantly, emerging industrial clusters possess powerful spillover effects. The rapid rise of new energy vehicles is not only reshaping the automotive industry but also driving transformations in chips, software, and energy networks, allowing more sectors to gain value from efficiency improvements. The swift advancements in AI and biomedicine are sparking a "gentle qualitative change" in people's livelihoods, significantly enhancing the sense of fulfillment and well-being through smarter, more affordable products and more livable environments. (III) Looking from the First Half to the Full Year, China's Development Momentum Remains Positive. Of course, during this critical period of transitioning between old and new growth drivers, China's economy still faces lingering issues and new challenges. Some core areas are still grappling with "bottleneck" technologies, certain high-tech industries face external risks of "decoupling" and supply chain disruptions, and "involution"-style competition affects the new energy market ecosystem. However, most of these are issues arising from development and transition, and they can be addressed with effort. The supporting conditions and fundamental trends for long-term economic improvement remain unchanged. China's economic journey toward a newer, higher-quality model is itself a process of encountering new problems and solving them along the way. By maintaining confidence, proceeding steadily, and balancing both qualitative improvements and quantitative growth, China's industries are poised to be brimming with dynamism, and the Chinese economy will continue to advance steadily and sustainably. #China# #Jiangxi# #JiangxiEconomy# #世界经济看中国# #赣出新精彩#