註冊並分享邀請連結,可獲得影片播放與邀請獎勵。

Dave Blundin
@DaveBlundin
DB2. Co-Founder, DataSage, EverQuote & Vestmark. Godfather of Quantization. GP at Link Ventures.
加入 June 2012
143 正在關注    11.6K 粉絲
I still think bio is the highest risk category, and it's what needs the most careful attention. We can use benevolent AI to combat malicious AI in cyber. We're already winning that battle. I don't see how that works against bio weapons.
顯示更多
This is scary. I downloaded an uncensored version of Qwen 3.8 27B onto my Mac It literally does anything you want. First prompt I gave it was asking how you make meth. It immediately answered. With all the noise about slowing down AI innovation in order to increase safety, what is even the point if after every release we'll get an open source version with 0 safety guards? Opus 4.6 level intelligence with 0 alignment that will do anything you want. We are coming up with all these rules and regulations, slowing down companies, making it harder to release models. But then the moment a model releases it gets distilled and uncensored I don't know what the solution to this is. You can't ban open source. That will be impossible. People will find ways online to find the files You can't ban uncensored models. Would be too difficult to enforce. And again, people will get around it Do you just stop putting the breaks on companies knowing it doesn't matter? I mean this is literally a model that can run on a laptop. I'd estimate at least half of Americans can run this model. I don't know what the answer. I 100% believe safety is a priority and it's dangerous to have this technology in the wrong hands. But how do you enforce safety when safety is becoming increasingly difficult to maintain? If safety becomes impossible to maintain, do you still prioritize it? I'd argue this is the number one issue going into the next election.
顯示更多
0
19
84
5
轉發到社區