註冊並分享邀請連結,可獲得影片播放與邀請獎勵。

ENS Foundation
@ENSfndn
The institutional home of ENS, supporting the protocol through grants, policy, standards and long term stewardship
加入 August 2026
11 正在關注    283 粉絲
one name should mean one owner that's why ENS built on .eth, a string the dns root can't delegate instead of a name that already exists in dns. ENS backs ICANN's single authoritative root names should work everywhere without colliding
顯示更多
This is exactly why I’m so adamant about DNS/ENS interoperability. .ai already exists in DNS. If Binance and SPACE ID are handing out matching .ai identities independently of the actual domain owners, they’re creating conflicting identities under the same names. That means the same name could identify one person on the web and someone else in a wallet. Users shouldn’t have to understand competing naming systems to figure out who they’re interacting with or paying. ENS is open and permissionless, with no licensing fee to integrate. It supports both .eth subnames and real DNS names. Binance could build its own branded naming service using that infrastructure. If all you need is an app username, use an app username. There’s no reason to dress it up as a DNS domain without respecting ownership of that domain. It’s 2026. We already have the infrastructure to avoid this confusion. Handing users DNS lookalikes and leaving them to discover the difference is embarrassing. I expect better from Binance and SPACE ID. Their users deserve better.
顯示更多