Helen Toner(@hlntnr):One leeetle tiny flaw in the "we have to have better AI than China, therefore we have to rush ahead as fast as possible": If you rush so much that your security is garbage and your increasingly advanced AI models are there for the taking by Chinese hackers, then you have uhhh not succeeded at making sure we have better AI than China (This attack was not by state-backed Chinese hackers—it was by 3 dudes and their buddies Claude and Codex, within 72 hours. I would guess the hack as described here would not have gotten them access to model weights, but we don't know; WSJ reports the repo they reached was merely "a large software repository of OpenAI’s algorithmic secrets.")

2026.09.18 03:23

One leeetle tiny flaw in the "we have to have better AI than China, therefore we have to rush ahead as fast as possible": If you rush so much that your security is garbage and your increasingly advanced AI models are there for the taking by Chinese hackers, then you have uhhh not succeeded at making sure we have better AI than China (This attack was not by state-backed Chinese hackers—it was by 3 dudes and their buddies Claude and Codex, within 72 hours. I would guess the hack as described here would not have gotten them access to model weights, but we don't know; WSJ reports the repo they reached was merely "a large software repository of OpenAI’s algorithmic secrets.")

613

轉發到社區

熱門用戶