No, Luke is obviously correct here. You can't have a serious money if the mining pools can just decide to ignore node runners whenever they want to, or are pressured to. Again, there was no URSF, but rather just behind the scenes lobbying. Large mining pool operators chose to side with Core and Saylor and against node runners. How many times will you need to observe this happening before you understand that node runners are no longer in control on BTC? It's simply not true that XBT is highly centralized, nor that everyone needs to do what Luke says. For example, we're about to do a soft fork that Luke is against. Care to discuss miner diversity on the SHA-256 chain?
顯示更多
