吴秋雨因为参与线上神学教育课程的行政工作，被认为利用信息网络从事非法的商业活动，起诉书上写，“未经许可利用信息网络非法销售涉宗教内容的课程包，收取非法经营款”，因此被起诉“非法经营罪”。事实上，收取的费用是注册费，旨在帮助学生完成学业，对于完成学业的优秀学生都有退还注册费的记录，已经有很多收到退费的学员愿意公开声明。 将其判定为盈利的经营活动显然缺乏说服力。起诉书上提到吴秋雨获得的非法经营款是39.9万元，这是她2020年至2025年的所有所得。事实上，这是这几年她在教会服事的供养，说得通俗点就是工资。乍一看40万似乎挺多，2020年到2025年平均到每个月才5500元，这个可能跟北京保安的收入差不多。她是北京人，中学就读北京四中，大学毕业于北京大学，后来去美国波斯顿的哥顿康威尔（Gordon-Conwell）获得硕士学位，以她的学历和能力，要靠这个来盈利，简直是荒唐至极！这么判，只是显出审判者的荒谬和可笑！

锡安教案律师们陆续收到通知，8月10日开庭前会议；8月14-18日进行公开开庭审理。有律师刚拿到卷宗都没有来得及看完厚达300卷的内容，律师提交的调查取证申请根本不给时间！开庭时间应该由庭前会议沟通后确认，现在就定下时间很显然是想走过场，草草结案，试问这些执法机构岂不是知法犯法？！连基本的法律程序都抛在一边了！ #锡安109教案# @VOAChinese @dashengmedia @nytchinese @RFA_Chinese @RFI_Cn @china_action @bbcchinese

广西壮族自治区北海市银海区人民检察院起诉书 北银检刑诉〔2026〕Z1号 被告人王林，男，1981年3月20日出生，公民身份号码*******,汉族,大学本科文化,户籍所在地广东省*******。因涉嫌非法利用信息网络罪，于2025年10月11日被北海市公安局银海分局刑事拘留，同年11月17日经本院批准逮捕，次日由北海市公安局银海分局执行逮捕。 被告人高颖佳，男，1978年8月31日出生，公民身份号码*******,汉族，博士研究生文化，户籍所在地北京市*******。因涉嫌非法利用信息网络罪，于2025年10月11日被北海市公安局银海分局刑事拘留，同年11月17日经本院批准逮捕，次日由北海市公安局银海分局执行逮捕。 被告人尹会彬，男，1967年9月23日出生，公民身份号码*******,汉族，大专文化，户籍所在地河北省*******。因涉嫌非法利用信息网络罪，于2025年10月11日被北海市公安局银海分局刑事拘留，同年11月17日经本院批准逮捕，次日由北海市公安局银海分局执行逮捕。 被告人王聪，女，1982年10月11日出生，公民身份号码*******,汉族，大学本科文化，户籍所在地吉林省*******。因涉嫌非法利用信息网络罪，于2025年10月12日被北海市公安局银海分局刑事拘留，同年11月17日经本院批准逮捕，次日由北海市公安局银海分局执行逮捕。 被告人刘桢彬，男，1987年1月5日出生，公民身份号码*******,汉族，硕士研究生文化，户籍所在地湖北省*******。因涉嫌非法利用信息网络罪，于2025年10月11日被北海市公安局银海分局刑事拘留，同年11月17日经本院批准逮捕，次日由北海市公安局银海分局执行逮捕。 被告人林书铖(曾用名林叔阳),男，1991年9月16日出生，公民身份号码*******,汉族，大学本科文化，户籍所在地山西省*******。因涉嫌非法利用信息网络罪，于2025年10月12日被北海市公安局银海分局刑事拘留，同年11月17日经本院批准逮捕，次日由北海市公安局银海分局执行逮捕。 被告人汪中(曾用名汪忠),男，1967年9月9日出生，公民身份号码*******,汉族，硕士研究生文化，户籍所在地辽宁省*******。因涉嫌非法利用信息网络罪，于2025年10月21日被北海市公安局银海分局刑事拘留，同年11月17日经本院批准逮捕，次日由北海市公安局银海分局执行逮捕。 被告人吴秋雨，女，1989年8月19日出生，公民身份号码*******,汉族，硕士研究生文化，户籍所在地及居住地北京市*******。因涉嫌非法利用信息网络罪，于2025年10月12日被北海市公安局银海分局刑事拘留，同年11月17日经本院批准逮捕，次日由北海市公安局银海分局执行逮捕。 本案由广西壮族自治区北海市公安局银海分局侦查终结，以被告人王林、高颖佳、尹会彬等八人涉嫌诈骗罪、非法经营罪，于2026年6月18日向本院移送审查起诉。本院受理后，于2026年6月19日已告知被告人有权委托辩护人和认罪认罚可能导致的法律后果，依法讯问了被告人，听取了辩护人的意见，审查了全部案件材料。 经依法审查查明： 一、诈骗罪 2007年，金明日(另案处理)未按照国家宗教管理规定向相关管理部门登记和备案，未取得在国内合法传教批准的情况下，在北京市非法成立“北京锡安教会”,被告人王林、高颖佳、尹会彬、王聪、刘桢彬、林书铖等人加入教会共同进行非法宗教活动。 2018年9月9日，“北京锡安教会”被北京市朝阳区民政局依法取缔。金明日、被告人尹会彬等人先后到北海市居住生活并继续开展非法宗教活动。被告人王林、高颖佳、尹会彬、王聪、刘桢彬、林书钺以牧师身份，分别负责长三角牧区、京津冀牧区、长三角和京津冀以外的大牧区、京津冀分牧区、青岛牧区、成都牧区的传教事务。被告人一伙明知教会被取缔且自己不具备合法传教资格，仍冒充宗教教职人员以牧师身份在互联网和线下各地 开展非法传教活动，骗取信徒的“奉献金”人民币(以下均为同一币种)1000余万元。 至案发，被告人王林分得赃款124.405万元，高颖佳分得赃款115.5464万元，尹会彬分得赃款56.3041万元，王聪分得赃款66.632万元，刘桢彬分得赃款64.348万元，林书铖分得赃款32.674万元。 二、非法经营罪 2018年10月，金明日违反国家法律法规等有关规定，非法设立“锡安圣经学院”,被告人王林任院长，被告人汪中任行政院长，被告人吴秋雨任教务长，自2020年至2025年，未经许可利用信息网络非法销售涉宗教等内容的“课程包”,收取非法经营款200余万元。 至案发，被告人王林分得非法经营款42.7万元，汪中分得非法经营款14.1万元，吴秋雨分得非法经营款39.9万元。 认定上述事实的证据如下： 1.物证：扣押的手机、电脑等；2.书证：户籍信息、取缔决定书等；3.被害人陈述：*******等人的陈述；4.证人证言：*******等证人的证言；5.被告人供述和辩解：王林、高颖佳、尹会彬等人的供述和辩解；6.搜查、辨认等笔录：搜查 笔录、辨认笔录等；7.视听资料、电子数据：授课视频、电子检材报告、银行流水、微信、支付宝交易明细等。 本院认为，被告人王林、高颖佳、尹会彬、王聪、刘桢彬、 林书钺以非法占有为目的，虚构事实、隐瞒真相，骗取他人财物， 数额特别巨大，其行为触犯了《中华人民共和国刑法》第二百六 十六条，犯罪事实清楚，证据确实、充分，应当以诈骗罪追究其刑事责任。被告人王林、汪中、吴秋雨违反国家规定，实施严重扰乱市场秩序的非法经营行为，情节特别严重，其行为触犯了《中华人民共和国刑法》第二百二十五条第(四)项，犯罪事实清楚，证据确实、充分，应当以非法经营罪追究其刑事责任。被告人王林、高颖佳、尹会彬、王聪、刘桢彬、林书钺共同故意实施诈骗的犯罪行为，被告人王林、汪中、吴秋雨共同故意实施非法经营的犯罪行为，依照《中华人民共和国刑法》第二十五条第一款之规定，是共同犯罪。被告人王林在共同诈骗、非法经营犯罪活动中起主要作用，被告人高颖佳、尹会彬在共同诈骗犯罪活动中起主要作用，依照《中华人民共和国刑法》第二十六条第一款、第四款之规定，是主犯，应当按照其所参与的全部犯罪处罚；被告人王聪、刘桢彬、林书铖在共同诈骗犯罪活动中起次要作用，被告人汪中、吴秋雨在共同非法经营犯罪活动中起次要作用，依照《中华人民共和国刑法》第二十七条之规定，是从犯，应当从轻或者减轻处罚。被告人王林、高颖佳、尹会彬、刘桢彬、林书铖、汪中、吴秋雨归案后如实供述自己的罪行，依照《中华人民共和国刑法》第六十七条第三款之规定，系坦白，可以从轻处罚。被告人王林在判决宣告以前一人犯数罪，依照《中华人民共和国刑法》第六十九条之规定，应当数罪并罚。被告人汪中自愿认罪认罚，依照《中华人民共和国刑事诉讼法》第十五条之规定，可以从宽处理。根据《中华人民共和国刑事诉讼法》第一百七十六条之规定，提起公诉，请依法判处。 此致 广西壮族自治区北海市银海区人民法院 副检察长 潘远霞 检察官 叶发强 吴国成 李苑华 检察官助理 刘佳诚 2026年7月17日 PEOPLE’S PROCURATORATE OF YINHAI DISTRICT, BEIHAI CITY, GUANGXI ZHUANG AUTONOMOUS REGION [UNOFFICAL ENGLISH TRANSLATION] INDICTMENT 北银检刑诉〔2026〕Z1号 Defendant Wang Lin (王林), male, born on March 20, 1981, PRC Resident Identity Card No. …, of Han ethnicity, with a bachelor’s-level education; place of household registration: …; current residence: … On suspicion of the crime of illegally using information networks, he was placed under criminal detention by the Yinhai Branch of the Beihai Municipal Public Security Bureau on October 11, 2025. His arrest was approved by this Procuratorate on November 17, 2025, and was executed by the Yinhai Branch of the Beihai Municipal Public Security Bureau on the following day. Defendant Gao Yingjia (高颖佳), male, born on August 31, 1978, PRC Resident Identity Card No. …, of Han ethnicity, with a doctoral-level postgraduate education; place of household registration: …; current residence: … On suspicion of the crime of illegally using information networks, he was placed under criminal detention by the Yinhai Branch of the Beihai Municipal Public Security Bureau on October 11, 2025. His arrest was approved by this Procuratorate on November 17, 2025, and was executed by the Yinhai Branch of the Beihai Municipal Public Security Bureau on the following day. Defendant Yin Huibin (尹会彬), male, born on September 23, 1967, PRC Resident Identity Card No. …, of Han ethnicity, with a junior-college education; place of household registration: …; current residence: …. On suspicion of the crime of illegally using information networks, he was placed under criminal detention by the Yinhai Branch of the Beihai Municipal Public Security Bureau on October 11, 2025. His arrest was approved by this Procuratorate on November 17, 2025, and was executed by the Yinhai Branch of the Beihai Municipal Public Security Bureau on the following day. Defendant Wang Cong (王聪), female, born on October 11, 1982, PRC Resident Identity Card No. …, of Han ethnicity, with a bachelor’s-level education; place of household registration: …; current residence: … On suspicion of the crime of illegally using information networks, she was placed under criminal detention by the Yinhai Branch of the Beihai Municipal Public Security Bureau on October 12, 2025. Her arrest was approved by this Procuratorate on November 17, 2025, and was executed by the Yinhai Branch of the Beihai Municipal Public Security Bureau on the following day. Defendant Liu Zhenbin (刘桢彬), male, born on January 5, 1987, PRC Resident Identity Card No. …, of Han ethnicity, with a master’s-level postgraduate education; place of household registration: …; current residence: … On suspicion of the crime of illegally using information networks, he was placed under criminal detention by the Yinhai Branch of the Beihai Municipal Public Security Bureau on October 11, 2025. His arrest was approved by this Procuratorate on November 17, 2025, and was executed by the Yinhai Branch of the Beihai Municipal Public Security Bureau on the following day. Defendant Lin Shucheng (林书铖, formerly known as Lin Shuyang [林叔阳]), male, born on September 16, 1991, PRC Resident Identity Card No. …, of Han ethnicity, with a bachelor’s-level education; place of household registration: …; current residence: … On suspicion of the crime of illegally using information networks, he was placed under criminal detention by the Yinhai Branch of the Beihai Municipal Public Security Bureau on October 12, 2025. His arrest was approved by this Procuratorate on November 17, 2025, and was executed by the Yinhai Branch of the Beihai Municipal Public Security Bureau on the following day. Defendant Wang Zhong (汪中, formerly known as 汪忠), male, born on September 9, 1967, PRC Resident Identity Card No. …, of Han ethnicity, with a master’s-level postgraduate education; place of household registration: …; current residence: … On suspicion of the crime of illegally using information networks, he was placed under criminal detention by the Yinhai Branch of the Beihai Municipal Public Security Bureau on October 21, 2025. His arrest was approved by this Procuratorate on November 17, 2025, and was executed by the Yinhai Branch of the Beihai Municipal Public Security Bureau on the following day. Defendant Wu Qiuyu (吴秋雨), female, born on August 19, 1989, PRC Resident Identity Card No. …, of Han ethnicity, with a master’s-level postgraduate education; place of household registration and current residence: … On suspicion of the crime of illegally using information networks, she was placed under criminal detention by the Yinhai Branch of the Beihai Municipal Public Security Bureau on October 12, 2025. Her arrest was approved by this Procuratorate on November 17, 2025, and was executed by the Yinhai Branch of the Beihai Municipal Public Security Bureau on the following day. The investigation of this case was concluded by the Yinhai Branch of the Beihai Municipal Public Security Bureau, which transferred the case to this Procuratorate for examination for prosecution on June 18, 2026, on suspicion that defendants Wang Lin, Gao Yingjia, Yin Huibin, and the other five defendants had committed the crimes of fraud and illegal business operations. After accepting the case, this Procuratorate informed the defendants on June 19, 2026, of their right to retain defense counsel and of the possible legal consequences of pleading guilty and accepting punishment, interrogated the defendants in accordance with law, heard the opinions of defense counsel, and examined all case materials. Upon examination in accordance with law, the following facts have been ascertained: I. Crime of Fraud In 2007, Jin Mingri (金明日, handled in a separate case), without registering or filing with the relevant administrative authorities as required by the State’s regulations on religious affairs and without obtaining approval to lawfully conduct religious preaching within China, unlawfully established the “Beijing Zion Church” in Beijing. Defendants Wang Lin, Gao Yingjia, Yin Huibin, Wang Cong, Liu Zhenbin, Lin Shucheng, and others joined the church and jointly engaged in unlawful religious activities. On September 9, 2018, the “Beijing Zion Church” was banned pursuant to law by the Civil Affairs Bureau of Chaoyang District, Beijing. Thereafter, Jin Mingri, defendant Yin Huibin, and others successively moved to and resided in Beihai City, where they continued to conduct unlawful religious activities. Acting as pastors, defendants Wang Lin, Gao Yingjia, Yin Huibin, Wang Cong, Liu Zhenbin, and Lin Shucheng were respectively responsible for religious preaching affairs in the Yangtze River Delta pastoral region, the Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei pastoral region, the broader pastoral region outside the Yangtze River Delta and Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei, the Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei sub-region, the Qingdao pastoral region, and the Chengdu pastoral region. Although they knew that the church had been banned and that they lacked lawful qualifications to preach, the defendants nevertheless falsely held themselves out as qualified religious clergy and, acting as pastors, conducted unlawful preaching activities on the internet and offline in various locations, thereby fraudulently obtaining more than RMB 10 million in “offerings” from congregants. By the time the case was uncovered, defendant Wang Lin had received RMB 1,244,050 in criminal proceeds; Gao Yingjia, RMB 1,155,464; Yin Huibin, RMB 563,041; Wang Cong, RMB 666,320; Liu Zhenbin, RMB 643,480; and Lin Shucheng, RMB 326,740. II. Crime of Illegal Business Operations In October 2018, Jin Mingri, in violation of relevant State laws and regulations, unlawfully established the “Zion Bible College.” Defendant Wang Lin served as president, defendant Wang Zhong as administrative dean, and defendant Wu Qiuyu as academic dean. From 2020 through 2025, without authorization, they used information networks to unlawfully sell “course packages” containing religious and related content and collected more than RMB 2 million in proceeds from illegal business operations. By the time the case was uncovered, defendant Wang Lin had received RMB 427,000 in proceeds from illegal business operations; Wang Zhong, RMB 141,000; and Wu Qiuyu, RMB 399,000. The evidence establishing the foregoing facts includes: 1. Physical evidence: seized mobile phones, computers, and other items; 2. Documentary evidence: household registration information, the decision to ban the organization, and other documents; 3. Statements of victims: statements by … and others; 4. Witness testimony: testimony by … and other witnesses; 5. Statements and defenses of the defendants: statements and defenses by Wang Lin, Gao Yingjia, Yin Huibin, and others; 6. Records of searches, identifications, and other investigative acts: search records, identification records, and related records; and 7. Audio-visual materials and electronic data: lecture videos, electronic evidence examination reports, bank transaction records, and WeChat and Alipay transaction details. This Procuratorate finds that defendants Wang Lin, Gao Yingjia, Yin Huibin, Wang Cong, Liu Zhenbin, and Lin Shucheng, with the purpose of unlawful possession, fabricated facts, concealed the truth, and fraudulently obtained property from others, with the amount involved being especially huge. Their conduct violates Article 266 of the Criminal Law of the People’s Republic of China. The facts of the crimes are clear, and the evidence is reliable and sufficient; they shall therefore be held criminally liable for the crime of fraud. Defendants Wang Lin, Wang Zhong, and Wu Qiuyu, in violation of State regulations, engaged in illegal business operations that seriously disrupted market order, under especially serious circumstances. Their conduct violates Article 225(4) of the Criminal Law of the People’s Republic of China. The facts of the crimes are clear, and the evidence is reliable and sufficient; they shall therefore be held criminally liable for the crime of illegal business operations. Defendants Wang Lin, Gao Yingjia, Yin Huibin, Wang Cong, Liu Zhenbin, and Lin Shucheng jointly and intentionally committed the crime of fraud. Defendants Wang Lin, Wang Zhong, and Wu Qiuyu jointly and intentionally committed the crime of illegal business operations. Pursuant to Article 25(1) of the Criminal Law of the People’s Republic of China, these are joint crimes. Defendant Wang Lin played a principal role in the joint crimes of fraud and illegal business operations, and defendants Gao Yingjia and Yin Huibin played principal roles in the joint crime of fraud. Pursuant to Article 26(1) and (4) of the Criminal Law of the People’s Republic of China, they are principal offenders and shall be punished on the basis of all crimes in which they participated. Defendants Wang Cong, Liu Zhenbin, and Lin Shucheng played secondary roles in the joint crime of fraud, and defendants Wang Zhong and Wu Qiuyu played secondary roles in the joint crime of illegal business operations. Pursuant to Article 27 of the Criminal Law of the People’s Republic of China, they are accomplices and shall be given lighter or mitigated punishment. After being brought to justice, defendants Wang Lin, Gao Yingjia, Yin Huibin, Liu Zhenbin, Lin Shucheng, Wang Zhong, and Wu Qiuyu truthfully confessed their crimes. Pursuant to Article 67(3) of the Criminal Law of the People’s Republic of China, they have made truthful confessions and may be given lighter punishment. Where defendant Wang Lin has committed multiple crimes before the pronouncement of judgment, pursuant to Article 69 of the Criminal Law of the People’s Republic of China, a combined punishment for multiple crimes shall be imposed. Defendant Wang Zhong voluntarily pleaded guilty and accepted punishment. Pursuant to Article 15 of the Criminal Procedure Law of the People’s Republic of China, he may be treated leniently. Pursuant to Article 176 of the Criminal Procedure Law of the People’s Republic of China, this Procuratorate hereby institutes a public prosecution and respectfully requests that the Court adjudicate and impose sentence in accordance with law. To: People’s Court of Yinhai District, Beihai City, Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region Deputy Chief Procurator: Pan Yuanxia Procurators: Ye Faqiang Wu Guocheng Li Yuanhua Assistant Procurator: Liu Jiacheng July 17, 2026

金牧师表示：“教会是否供养愿意服事主的传道人，是由执事会和长老会决定的。我们的传道人不是为了牟利，更没有在牧养活动里边欺骗的手段，让来到我们教会的信徒亏损。” 办案人员调查的第二个重点，是锡安教会内部设立的圣经学院。2018年以前，锡安教会曾与其他家庭教会合作开展神学教育。教会遭打压后，为避免其他神学院受到牵连，传道人和教会骨干培训转到教会内部进行。 圣经学院部分课程收取300元登记费。这笔钱不是学费，而是希望学员对培训有所投入。部分学员完成课程后，登记费还会退还，学院大部分开支由教会奉献承担。 他说：“政府这次把我们内部用于同工培训的圣经学校当作非法教育机构，然后又说我们通过这个学校牟利。现在剩下的8位同工被起诉非法经营，主要指的就是圣经学校。” 金明日认为，办案部门把教会牧养中的奉献、牧者供养和内部宗教教育列入刑事案件，相当于把中国家庭教会长期存在的宗教活动刑事化。 金牧师还说，办案人员声称有信徒指证教会诈骗。教会方面了解后发现，部分信徒受到办案人员误导。这些信徒愿意重新作证，说明教会没有欺骗他们，也没有通过牧养使他们遭受经济损失。

7月17日，王林、尹会彬、高颖佳、王聪、吴秋雨、汪中、林书铖、刘桢彬8位锡安的牧者同工，在辩护律师未获任何通知的情况下，被起诉至北海市银海区人民法院。这是公然的违法行为！ On July 17, without any prior notification to the defense lawyers, the case was formally indicted at the Beihai City Yinhai District People’s Court. 详情如下： 北京锡安教会“10·9”教案至今已进入第286天。 自2025年10月9日起，共有23位牧者及同工被羁押。目前，其中14位已取保候审，1位获检察机关决定不起诉并释放。截至今日，仍有8位牧者及同工被羁押于广西北海市第一、第二看守所，涉嫌“诈骗罪”及/或“非法经营罪”。案件已于2026年6月18日移送北海市银海区人民检察院审查起诉，并于7月17日在辩护律师毫不知情的情况下，被起诉至北海市银海区人民法院。 根据《人民检察院刑事诉讼规则》第二百六十一条规定： 办理审查起诉案件，应当听取辩护人或者值班律师、被害人以及诉讼代理人的意见，并制作笔录。辩护人或者值班律师、被害人及其诉讼代理人提出书面意见的，应当附卷。 《人民检察院刑事诉讼规则》第二百六十二条进一步规定，对于听取辩护人意见存在困难的，应当积极采取措施予以完成；确因客观原因无法听取的，应当将相关情况记录在案。 然而，本案承办检察官在未依法履行上述法定程序、未听取辩护律师意见的情况下，即将案件移送人民法院审判。该做法明显违反了《人民检察院刑事诉讼规则》的明确规定，严重损害了犯罪嫌疑人依法享有的辩护权利和诉讼权利。 案件近况 1、7月3日，金明日牧师已赴美国，与家人团聚。 2、7月17日，王林、尹会彬、高颖佳、王聪、吴秋雨、汪中、林书铖、刘桢彬等8位牧者同工，在辩护律师未获任何通知的情况下，被起诉至北海市银海区人民法院。 3、北海目前持续高温高湿。羁押人员长期居住于约四十平方米、容纳三十余人的监室内，居住环境拥挤，已有多人出现严重痱子、湿疹等症状。 4、部分患有严重疾病的牧者同工至今仍未获得必要的药物和医疗救治；申请营养餐亦遭拒绝，身体状况持续恶化。 5、8位牧者同工长期营养不足，普遍出现明显消瘦，健康状况令人担忧。 6、被羁押牧者同工依法享有的通信权利持续受到限制。 代祷事项 1、求神带领所有参与办理本案的专案组人员、看守所工作人员，以及公安、检察、法院、司法行政机关、监督部门和相关上级机关，使他们存敬畏之心，尊重国家宪法和法律，依法、公平、公正地对待8位被羁押的牧者同工。 2、求神亲自看顾8位牧者同工的身体，医治他们一切的疾病和软弱。 3、求神赐下但以理所得的恩典，使8位牧者同工即便在营养不足的环境中，仍蒙神保守，身体强健，面色红润，满有从神而来的智慧和力量。 4、求神坚固律师团队的信心和力量，保守他们手中的工作，也眷顾他们的家人，使他们免受一切搅扰。 5、求神看顾每一位家属和孩子每日的生活，亲自安慰他们，擦去他们一切的眼泪，担当他们的重担，赐下平安与喜乐。 6、求神在媒体领域开道路，使公平、真实、自由的声音能够被更多人听见，也除去谎言和蒙蔽。 7、求神按着祂的旨意，早日释放祂的仆人使女，使他们能够平安回到家人与教会当中。 我们谴责一切违反法治原则、损害公民合法权利的行为，呼吁有关机关切实尊重宪法和法律所赋予公民的各项权利，依法办案、公正司法。 我们也继续迫切祷告，惟愿“公平如大水滚滚，使公义如江河滔滔。”（阿摩司书5:24）愿光明胜过黑暗，愿公义与良善彰显于这地。 北京锡安教会“10·9”教案被羁押牧者同工家属团 2026年7月21日 The Beijing Zion Church “10·9” case has now entered its 286th day. Since October 9, 2025, a total of 23 pastors and church workers have been detained. As of today, 14 have been released on bail, and 1 has been released after the procuratorate decided not to prosecute. 8 pastors and church workers remain detained in Beihai City No. 1 and No. 2 Detention Centers in Guangxi, charged with “fraud” and/or “illegal business operations.” The case was transferred to the Beihai City Yinhai District People’s Procuratorate for review and prosecution on June 18, 2026. On July 17, without any prior notification to the defense lawyers, the case was formally indicted at the Beihai City Yinhai District People’s Court. According to Article 261 of the People’s Procuratorate Criminal Procedure Rules: When handling a case for review and prosecution, the opinions of the defender, duty lawyer, victim, and litigation representative shall be heard and recorded. Written opinions submitted by the defender, duty lawyer, victim, or their litigation representative shall be attached to the case file. Article 262 further stipulates that if it is difficult to hear the defender’s opinions, active measures shall be taken to do so; if it is genuinely impossible due to objective reasons, the circumstances shall be documented. However, the prosecutor handling this case transferred it to the court for trial without fulfilling these mandatory legal procedures or hearing the defense lawyers’ opinions. This action clearly violates the explicit provisions of the People’s Procuratorate Criminal Procedure Rules and seriously infringes upon the criminal suspects’ lawful rights to defense and due process. Recent Developments 1 On July 3, Pastor Jin Mingri was released to the United States and reunited with his family. 2 On July 17, eight pastors and church workers — Wang Lin, Yin Huibin, Gao Yingjia, Wang Cong, Wu Qiuyu, Wang Zhong, Lin Shucheng, and Liu Zhenbin — were indicted at the Beihai City Yinhai District People’s Court without any notice being given to their defense lawyers. 3 Beihai is currently experiencing sustained high temperatures and humidity. The detainees are held in overcrowded cells of approximately 40 square meters containing more than 30 people. Many have developed severe heat rash, eczema, and other skin conditions. 4 Some pastors and workers with serious pre-existing medical conditions have still not received necessary medication or medical treatment. Requests for nutritious meals have been denied, and their health continues to deteriorate. 5 The eight detained pastors and workers suffer from long-term malnutrition and visible weight loss; their health is a serious concern. 6 Their legally entitled right to communication continues to be restricted. Prayer Requests 1 Pray that God would lead all personnel involved in handling this case — including the special task force, detention center staff, and personnel in public security, procuratorial, court, judicial administration, supervisory departments, and relevant higher authorities — to have a heart of reverence, respect the national Constitution and laws, and treat the eight detained pastors and workers fairly, justly, and in accordance with the law. 2 Pray that God would personally watch over the physical health of the eight pastors and workers, healing all their illnesses and weaknesses. 3 Pray that God would grant them the same grace given to Daniel, so that even in a nutritionally deficient environment, they would be preserved by God — strong in body, with healthy complexions, and filled with wisdom and strength from the Lord. 4 Pray that God would strengthen the faith and strength of the legal defense team, protect their work, and watch over their families, shielding them from all disturbances. 5 Pray that God would care for every family member and child in their daily lives, personally comfort them, wipe away all their tears, carry their heavy burdens, and grant them peace and joy. 6 Pray that God would open doors in the media realm so that voices of fairness, truth, and freedom can be heard by more people, and that lies and deception would be removed. 7 Pray that, according to His will, God would soon release His servants and handmaidens, allowing them to return safely to their families and the church. We condemn all actions that violate the rule of law and infringe upon citizens’ legitimate rights. We call on the relevant authorities to earnestly respect the rights granted to citizens by the Constitution and laws, and to handle cases lawfully and with judicial fairness. We continue to pray urgently, longing for the fulfillment of God’s word:“But let justice roll on like a river, righteousness like a never-failing stream!” (Amos 5:24) May light overcome darkness, and may justice and goodness be revealed in this land. Families of the Detained Pastors and Workers in the Beijing Zion Church “10·9” Case July 21, 2026

吴秋雨狱中来信（2026年6月）——给丈夫的话： 我没有像你那么多的事情可做，我想你的时间可能比你想我的时间更多，这次的信也听到了我们夫妻彼此的挂念和支持，我希望你可以胜过里面的愤怒和不平，就像你的微信签名一样“我愿男人无愤怒、无争竞，举起圣洁的手随处祷告”（提前2:8），所以我们传递出来的信息是出于我们里面的丰盛，而不是我们里面的缺乏和疼痛。 我已经把歌罗西书都背下来了，每天晚上站岗背一遍，能过去半小时。里面基督的卓越性，和祂与世界的关系是特别给力的。基督是教会与世界和解的地方，教会是为这样的基督作见证的地点，无论我们有多少空间，甚至如同耶稣基督出生的时候客店都没有房子，只在马槽里包着布，但是上帝依然存留地方，让祂的救恩可以显明出来，我想与我们的感受有共鸣之处，“教会不是为了自身空间而存在，而是为了服侍这个世界”。 我们是基督的见证人，在祂里面上帝与世界都和解了。我里面还是挺有平安的。在这边还有几个项目没有做完，拿世界地图祷告的计划，还在欧洲进行了一半，亚洲还没去。我也求主保守我们夫妻能够更深的合一吧。你多吃水果，我在这边想吃吃不到。上次你过生日的时候我吃到了苹果，我在想我下次吃水果的时候要么是在外面、要么你过生日，端午节我吃到了一个肥肉馅的粽子，撑了一两天。 平时饭的量够，就是缺营养。我心里面还觉得挺甘甜的，让我想到刚开始服侍的地方，也是生活很简单，心里很火热，觉得每天很充实。近几年生活，尤其是结婚有孩子后，生活更安逸了，好像是丢掉了之前的单纯，但这这边可以把那种单纯的喜乐找回来。 你专心服侍教会吧，等神的时间。我有时候也会想想以后出去的样子。这里面有一个思想认识需要背下来，“检讨昨天，接受今天，思考明天”。 有孩子以来自己在灵修祷告上有不少的缺陷，在这里可以重新锻炼，相信主的意思是好的，对个人和我们的家。祂真的是有忍耐宽容良善的主，也温柔的引导我们的心。我也为你祷告，求主看顾你的心思意念，因为你发的声音影响会比较大，让你的里面能够被保守，从里面出来才是可以影响人的。 #锡安109教案# #释放吴秋雨#

吴秋雨狱中来信（2026年7月）： 金牧能够自由，挺为他开心的！ 最近我在这边还行，雨也比较多，气温降下来了，最热的是五月份六月初，到了雨季热不起来了。同时五月底六月初是北海最热的时候。热的时候出汗，还能守得住。 我力所能及与人为善，还帮人写家信，这种服侍对他们来说是很重要的，会把家事跟人讲，是很信任的，也不好讲、感情不好表露。 这边生理期的问题，管教跟我说，这边很多人都会出现这个问题，出去就好了。我就是时间有点长，医生他们不熟悉精神药物。他们也不敢冒然打激素，怕与精神药物冲突，基本上他们是不作为，药片不起作用。 #锡安109教案# #释放吴秋雨#

广西北海公安局回复自相矛盾！ 银海分区公安局扣押身份证不还，已经是违法，还以申请人没有身份证明拒绝信息公开申请！ 难道你们违法不还身份证就是为了不做信息公开的借口？

广西北海办案机关真拉胯！ 银海区分局、银海区检察院公然违法，效率低下！ 今天（2026年7月7日）吴秋雨辩护律师要求银海区分局退还吴秋雨身份证，根据刑诉法149“对查封、扣押的财物、文件……经查明确实与案件无关的，应当在三日以内解除查封、扣押，予以退还。”这不是律师第一次要求退还身份证，银海区分局的谢飞警官，在律师多次联系，并提交书面申请要求退还吴秋雨身份证原件，均以出差为由，拒绝退还，并让律师走程序。 律师已经拨打12389进行投诉。 同日，吴秋雨辩护律师去检察院调取卷宗，一早就约好了，律师等到下午也不给，理由是还没拷贝好。你们拷贝一份卷宗要一天时间？这是什么效率？为什么其他家属已经调取卷宗？ 上个月律师申请取保候审，6月28日得到回复，拒绝保释，给出的理由是“部分犯罪事实未查清”拒绝，请问你们调查了7个多月，把手机、电脑、银行卡流水都调出来了，怎么还弄不清？ 教案时间线： 2025年10月10晚8点 吴秋雨被北海银海分区警察从北京家中带走； 2025年10月12日给我下达拘留通知书，文件落款日期却是2025年9月26日（这是未卜先知？） 2025年11月18日银海区检察院批准银海分局对吴秋雨拘留37天后以“涉嫌非法利用信息网络罪”执行逮捕； 2026年1月18日侦查期届满，延期一个月到二月； 2026年2月18日又延期两个月到四月份； 2026年4月18日又延期两个月到六月份； 2026年6月18日被移交检察机关； 2026年6月29日检察机关拒绝取保理由是“部分事实未查清” 没见过像你们这样的严重拖延症的患者！这难道不是对我们家人的变相虐待？

律师收到了不予保释的答复，理由是“本案部分犯罪事实未查清”，调查了7个多月，还没查清？还是根本就是捏造罪名呢？ 作为锡安教会主任牧师已经释放了，其他同工更应该一同无罪释放！ #锡安109教案# #释放吴秋雨#

看守所对关押者通信权利的剥夺： 2025年10月刚被关押的时候，被告知一个月才能给家里寄一封信，到了2026年1月，看守所规则改了，要表现好没有罚班才有资格写信！由于吴秋雨要服药，精神状态不佳，常被视为表现不好，取消寄信的资格。而她寄的仅有的几封信，因为涉及信仰内容被克扣，自教案以来，我们家属收到吴秋雨寄的信只有六封，最近一次收到的信封上把内寄信和附带的照片都扣了！只有一个短信提醒家属寄药！

2026年6月28日，卢思位律师作为吴秋雨委托的控告律师向北海市银海分局和北海第一看守所提交控告，追究其滥用职权、玩忽职守等法律责任，并向看守所申请信息公开。请有关部门正面回应！

“他们（警察）把她反手铐上，并带走了手机、电脑，两个不到三岁的孩子似乎还不明白所发生的事情，老二在床上蹦蹦跳跳的，茫然无知，还笑嘻嘻的扑在妈妈怀里，可是妈妈的手被拷着，没法抱她，老二一不小心从床上摔到地上。外婆赶紧扑过去，把她抱起来。老大似懂非懂，扑过去抱着妈妈的大腿，还去摸摸妈妈背后的手铐，令人心碎。” 外婆 2025年10月10日深夜

爸爸每天跟哥哥妹妹视频，至于妈妈为什么缺席？他们的概念就是爸爸妈妈出差了，到远方去了。有时候哥哥也会生气，发脾气，不想跟爸爸视频。有一天他自己在客厅大喊一声：妈妈，我想你了！我在门口，奶奶在隔壁房间，听见了潸然含泪。他自己什么事儿都没有。 外婆 2026年4月27号

我为自己的妻子发声，不是牧者的身份，而是丈夫理所当然的责任和使命！我想到她在里面的痛苦和需要，这仿佛发生在我身上；我由此体会，基督对他的新妇——受逼迫的教会也有的那种疼痛。作为受困中的妻子，我对她的期待就是在忍耐中，不要被里面的折磨和恐吓欺骗，不要忘记我们在神里面尊贵的身份和内心的自由，相信我给你的信息和承诺；同样的，在逼迫中的教会，不能被这世界的谎言和恐吓迷惑，我们需要在定睛在新郎——基督的应许上。 #锡安109教案# #释放吴秋雨#