Tron Inc. (NASDAQ: TRON) acquired 149,297 TRX tokens today at an average price of $0.3349 further increasing its TRX treasury holdings to more than 709.9 million TRX in total. The company aims to further grow its Tron DAT holdings to enhance long term shareholder value. For live update on the designated on-chain TRX treasury wallet for Tron Inc., please refer to:

June was a huge month for agentic commerce on @base We saw significant transaction volume growth (+297% from May), driven largely by the success of @BlockRunAI And the average transaction size significantly decreased during June as well, going as low as $0.11 from a high of $1.04 in March micropayments are fundamental to agentic commerce and will unlock entirely new economies previously stuck behind large transaction minimums Source: Artemis[.]ai

Weekly Major Events on Calendar! 📅 July 27 🔵 $WAL unlocks 38.33M tokens (worth $1.12M, 1.56% of the circulation). 📅 July 28 🔵 @Zcash Ironwood upgrade activated on mainnet. 🔵 $XPL unlocks 297.22M tokens (worth $24.72M, 11.054% of the circulation). 🔵 $SIGN unlocks 207.78M tokens (worth $3.63M, 10.755% of the circulation). 📅 July 29 🔵 $HYPE unlocks 9.92M tokens (worth $577.45M, 4.458% of the circulation). 📅 July 30 🔵 @grvt_io TGE. 🔴 U.S. Q2 Real GDP Annualized Quarterly Rate. 🔴 The Federal Reserve's FOMC announced its interest rate decision. 📅 July 31 🔵 $FLOCK unlocks 168.04M tokens (worth $5.65M, 40.894% of the circulation). 🔴 Final reading of U.S. one-year inflation expectations in July. 📅 Aug 1 🔵 $BEAT unlocks 21.25M tokens (worth $72.46M, 6.862% of the circulation). 🔵 $EIGEN unlocks 38.35M tokens (worth $7.92M, 5.178% of the circulation). 🔵 @oxiumxyz shuts down. 📅 Aug 2 🔵 $ZAMA unlocks 279.58M tokens (worth $15.48M, 12.708% of the circulation). 🔵 $ENA unlocks 110.95M tokens (worth $9.58M, 1.16% of the circulation). 🔵 $2Z unlocks 135.41M tokens (worth $8.44M, 3.903% of the circulation).

Weekly Major Events on Calendar! 📅 Aug 24 🔵 X-Agent(@XAgent_official) Launches 2026 AI MCP Hackathon. 🔵 $SOSO unlocks 25.96M tokens (worth $8.29M, 7.592% of the circulation). 📅 Aug 25 🔵 @TermMaxFi ($TMX) TGE. 🔵 @HeebooOfficial ($HEEBOO) public sales starts. 🔵 $COAI unlocks 8.32M tokens (worth $2.74M, 4.424% of the circulation). 📅 Aug 26 🔵 $HUMA unlocks 458.76M tokens (worth $10.29M, 26.467% of the circulation). 🔵 $ALT unlocks 246.59M tokens (worth $1.68M, 3.581% of the circulation). 🔵 @umia_finance ($UMIA) token sale starts. 📅 Aug 27 🔵 Bitcoin Asia 2026 in HongKong on August 27-28. 📅 Aug 28 🔵 $XPL unlocks 297.22M tokens (worth $30.97M, 11.054% of the circulation). 🔵 $BIRB unlocks 27.08M tokens (worth $1.56M, 9.503% of the circulation). 📅 Aug 29 🔵 $HYPE unlocks 9.92M tokens (worth $745.24M, 4.458% of the circulation).

ZEROBASE WEEKLY 6.29-7.5 ZBT performed well, bucking the downward trend to rise. It traded in the $0.12–$0.14 zone, climbing toward $0.14 on July 1 supported by a sharp surge in trading volumes that exceeded $50M on peak days during a technical breakout from a downtrend. Liquidity conditions stayed solid across the entire period, with tight bid-ask spreads holding firm. Crypto market showed signs of resilience this week amid lingering volatility, geopolitical tensions, and mixed macro signals, managing a modest recovery driven largely by short-covering and easing near-term rate-hike concerns. Total market capitalization moved from roughly $2.20T–$2.25T early in the period toward the $2.25T–$2.30T zone by Sunday, with Bitcoin dominance holding steady near 55%. Bitcoin opened the week near $59,500–$60,000, pulled back to a mid-week low around $57,700–$58,500 on July 1, then rebounded sharply to trade in the $63,000–$63,200 range by close — recording a net gain of roughly 5% from the weekly low. ETH moved in tandem, starting around $1,610, dipping toward $1,550 mid-week before settling near $1,770–$1,780. Derivatives metrics pointed to cautious but stabilizing sentiment: BTC futures open interest held largely steady in the $45B–$50B band, 24-hour liquidations stayed moderate with a notable short-squeeze component in recent sessions, and funding rates on major pairs such as BTC/USDT remained near neutral. Macro developments provided mixed signals but ultimately supportive tailwinds for risk assets. The June jobs report showed only +57,000 jobs added (weaker than expected), with unemployment dipping to 4.2%, which reduced near-term Federal Reserve rate hike concerns. Geopolitical risks persisted with US-Iran tensions in the Persian Gulf and ongoing Middle East developments, yet de-escalation talks offered some relief. US equities rebounded strongly in the shortened trading week: the S&P 500 gained approximately 1.8%, the Nasdaq rose ~2.1%, and the Dow added ~2.0%, hitting record highs amid a Mag 7 recovery. Still, the sector held firm as institutional positioning showed tentative stabilization. Bitcoin spot ETFs suffered heavy June outflows of roughly $4.15B (the worst monthly total since launch), but recorded a notable $222M net inflow on July 2, snapping a 10-day outflow streak. Positive regulatory signals, including SEC comments indicating a more neutral approach to crypto products and political backing against treating Bitcoin like stocks for payments, offered a constructive longer-term backdrop. Key developments this week also included the CLARITY Act deadline slipping and continued institutional interest in Ethereum infrastructure. In summary, the period delivered a measured rebound in spot prices and positioning despite the Crypto Fear & Greed Index remaining in extreme fear territory (readings around 15–22). With short-covering providing immediate momentum, macro relief from soft jobs data, regulatory progress, the market appears to be establishing a more stable base heading further into Q3 — though sustained institutional inflows will be key to confirming the trend.

A 35B co-work agent with only 3B active parameters. Occamy-1.0 is built to carry complex workflows through. 📜 Apache 2.0. 🤖 📄 🏆 Scores 69.10 on AutomationBench, up 29.7 points from Qwen3.6-35B-A3B and ranking #1# in the evaluated 35B-A3B group. 🧭 Maintains context across search, tool calls, terminal coding, files, delegated runs, and history compaction, while retaining strong instruction following. 🧠 Execution-grounded training spans long-horizon interaction, software engineering, and tool-call grounding. Marathon and Sprint experts are merged, then refined with SAO. 🛠️ The open Dressage stack supports multi-harness RL. BF16, FP8, NVFP4, and GGUF checkpoints are also available.

During Tesla Cybercab launch week in Austin, I took a total of 12 paid Cybercab rides and kept every receipt. TOTAL: • 12 rides • 29.7 miles traveled • $108.34 total spent • $3.65 average cost per mile • 2 hours and 19 minutes riding around Austin in a Cybercab • Compared to Uber and Waymo, every Cybercab ride was still ~30-50% cheaper EACH OF MY CYBERCAB RIDES: 1/ Sept 3 — 7:23 PM 3.9 miles · 16 min · $8.70 ≈ $2.23/mile 2/ Sept 3 — 7:53 PM 0.5 miles · 6 min · $4.65 ≈ $9.30/mile 3/ Sept 4 — 6:52 AM 2.5 miles · 12 min · $6.99 ≈ $2.80/mile 4/ Sept. 4 — 7:13 AM 2.4 miles · 11 min · $6.84 ≈ $2.85/mile 5/ Sept. 4 — 7:39 AM 1.8 miles · 11 min · $6.16 ≈ $3.42/mile 6/ Sept. 4 — 8:03 AM 1.4 miles · 8 min · $5.69 ≈ $4.06/mile 7/ Sept. 4 — 8:20 AM 3.3 miles · 15 min · $7.90 ≈ $2.39/mile 8/ Sept. 4 — 10:58 AM 4.0 miles · 19 min · $8.78 ≈ $2.20/mile 9/ Sept. 4 — 11:58 AM 2.6 miles · 8 min · $7.08 ≈ $2.72/mile 10/ Sept. 4 — 2:17 PM 2.8 miles · 11 min · $13.71 ≈ $4.90/mile 11/ Sept. 5 — 12:57 PM 2.4 miles · 10 min · $16.18 ≈ $6.74/mile 12/ Sept. 5 — 1:36 PM 2.1 miles · 12 min · $15.66 ≈ $7.46/mile One of the biggest things I learned from actually using Cybercab is that you cannot judge the economics from just one ride. Pricing is dynamic. Some of my longer rides came in cheaper around $2.20–$2.40 per mile. Some of the shorter or higher-demand rides were much more expensive. Sometimes, the Cybercab was even more expensive than the Model Y (Unsupervised) bc the demand was so high. Some of the rides also became more expensive as Cybercabs became bookable on September 4 to the general public. However, it’s hard for me to look at these receipts and not wonder how Uber and Lyft can compete if Tesla can scale Cybercab the way it wants to. Uber and Lyft were built around connecting riders with human drivers. That means every ride has to support a much bigger cost stack... like 1/ A human has to be paid. 2/ That person needs a car. 3/ That car has to be financed or purchased. 4/ It needs insurance. 5/ Maintenance. 6/ Fuel or charging. 7/ And then Uber or Lyft still needs its cut. Cybercab attacks the biggest cost in that entire system which is the driver... there is no driver waiting to be paid at the end of the ride. And Tesla is supplying the software. Tesla can build the car. Build the battery. Build the autonomy system. Operate the network. Control the app. Control the charging. And the team designed the Cybercab from Day 1 around being a Robotaxi instead of taking a normal consumer car and trying to make the economics work. This is a big deal. Bc if Tesla can manufacture these at huge scale, keep them on the road for most of the day, and keep bringing the cost per mile down, then Uber and Lyft are going to be competing with the company that built the vehicle, the driver, and the network ALL AT ONCE. And this was during launch week... with just ~45 Cybercabs, before this vehicle is anywhere close to mature scale. If Tesla can push that cost down further as the fleet grows to thousands and millions, while Uber and Lyft still have to pay a human being to sit behind the wheel… I really don't see how these companies can survive... I think the days of Uber and Lyft are limited.

🚨 Spry Strategies just dropped the numbers. @TimBurchett: +30.4 net favorability! Highest very favorable in the field at 29.7%. Most known name on the board. Clears Glenn Jacobs, Fleischmann, and the rest by a mile. While half these guys are still introducing themselves, Burchett already owns the room. Tennessee knows who shows up and fights. Keep stacking wins, Congressman!🇺🇸