Register and share your invite link to earn from video plays and referrals.

Search results for 2AM、10年ぶりの単独来日公演決定!大阪8
2AM、10年ぶりの単独来日公演決定!大阪8 community
One keyword maps to one global community path.
Create community
People
Not Found
Tweets including 2AM、10年ぶりの単独来日公演決定!大阪8
The GREAT MARC ANDREESSEN @pmarca SPENT THREE AND A HALF HOURS WITH @joerogan . I'VE BEEN THINKING ABOUT IT EVER SINCE. I'm a cardiologist. I've spent twenty-five years at UCLA and in my own practice in Tarzana. So when one of the most influential technologists alive starts talking about medicine, I listen carefully — and I push back where I think he's wrong. Here's my honest verdict: he's right about far more than my profession is ready to admit. 1. He says AGI already arrived — and nobody noticed. Marc's claim is that the line was crossed roughly three months before the interview, with the current frontier models, and the field is now moving so fast that nobody stops to register milestones anymore. Think about that. The thing humanity has argued about for seventy years may have quietly happened on a Tuesday, and we were all busy checking email. 2. The models now beat the experts he could call on the phone. This is a man who can call almost anyone on earth. He says the AI gives him better answers. My first instinct was to bristle — twenty-five years of training, and a machine does it better? Then I sat with it honestly. He isn't wrong. Though I'll add what he didn't: independent studies of AI health tools have found real misses on true emergencies. Take the claim seriously and verify it yourself. 3. The hardest thing he said, and he said it about doctors. He points out that physicians are already typing your symptoms into ChatGPT the moment you stop talking, and then asks out loud: what do I need you for? That question stung. It also deserves an answer instead of a defense. He's right that the machine will out-read me on the EKG, the echo, the labs, the scan. It doesn't get tired at 2am. It doesn't forget the rare diagnosis it saw once in residency. Any physician whose ego prevents him from using a better tool is a physician putting pride ahead of patients. 4. His method for hard subjects: escalating simplicity. Explain it like I'm 10. Then like I'm 5. Then like I'm 2. Keep going until it truly clicks. I've started doing this and it has changed how I read papers outside my specialty. 5. He doesn't ask for the right answer. He asks the AI to steelman both sides of a hard question — the strongest possible case for each — and then he decides himself. That's not outsourcing your thinking. That's the opposite. 6. He convenes a panel. For the big questions, he has the AI role-play a room full of experts arguing with each other, and he listens to the argument. Imagine having that available for the biggest decision of your life. 7. His most important line has nothing to do with computers. The moment you think "I don't know how to figure this out" is exactly when most people quit — and exactly when you should lean in instead. Read that again. That's not a technology lesson. That's a life lesson, and it applies whether you're facing a diagnosis, a divorce, or a business that's failing. 8. The only skill left is knowing what to ask. The bottleneck is no longer the machine. It's in your own head. The quality of your life is now, more than ever, downstream of the quality of your questions. 9. He sends it photographs. Rashes, blood tests, images — the current models read pictures directly and give a fast second opinion. As a physician I'll say clearly: a second opinion, not a substitute for one. But the day a worried parent at midnight has something intelligent to consult is a good day for humanity. 10. Free therapy, for everyone, forever. This is the one that moved me most. He points to cognitive behavioral therapy as the clinically proven modality an AI can plausibly deliver on its own — meaning real therapeutic support becomes freely available at scale. Think about what that means. The man lying awake at 3am with nobody to call. The single mother who can't afford a therapist. The teenager who can't yet say the words out loud to a human face. For all of human history, healing was rationed by geography, wealth, and luck. That is ending in our lifetime. 11. It's solving problems we couldn't. He cites AI cracking previously unsolved math problems, with early signals of the same beginning in physics, chemistry, and biology. Cardiology is downstream of biology. Every drug I prescribe came out of that pipeline. 12. The top AI engineers are earning up to $50 million a year. He offers this less as gossip than as a signal — that's what a civilizational shift looks like from the inside. 13. A friend built his own health dashboard. Sequenced his DNA, handed it to an AI along with his blood work and wearable data, and got back a working picture of his own body. That is precision medicine arriving through the side door, years ahead of schedule. 14. Another friend put cameras in his jiu-jitsu gym. So the AI could review his sparring and coach his technique. Elite coaching, for anything, for anyone. 15. The warning he gave — "the AI vampire." This is the term he coined, and as a physician it's the one I want you to hear. Because AI keeps making more output possible, people are working more and sleeping less, addicted to their own productivity. Let me be blunt with you as a heart doctor. Chronic sleep deprivation raises blood pressure, drives inflammation, disrupts your rhythm, and shortens your life. Marc named the disease before most physicians did. Do not let a machine that never sleeps convince you that you don't have to either. 16. One person, many agents. His extrapolation: a single human eventually directing a fleet of AI agents that check each other's work. He describes this as close. Not years away. 17. And his own caveat, which I'll repeat. Watch the whole interview. Several of these are Marc's stated views and personal anecdotes, not independently verified facts. He'd be the first to tell you to think for yourself — that's the entire point of #5#. So here's where I land, as a doctor who has sat with thousands of frightened people. Marc is right that the diagnosis is no longer the hard part. What remains — what will always remain — is the chair pulled close, the hand held, the human being who says I'm not going anywhere, we'll walk through this together. But that was never in competition with the machine. The machine frees me to do more of it. Marc calls himself a techno-optimist. From inside an exam room, watching patients whose lives are about to get measurably longer and better because of this — I'd just call him right. 🙏
Show more
It's 2 AM and you need 8 H100s for a sweep. @awscloud: quota check → capacity check → maybe a 3-10 day wait. @ionet scheduler match in 28 seconds. Training running in under 4 minutes. No quota tickets or waiting on someone else's reservation. Just live bids, matched instantly, so you can keep building
Show more
What’s y’all’s current sex schedule? Mine is 10 PM to 2 AM 😭
🚨 SERIOUS COMPLAINT 🚨 I am formally and angrily calling out the Beijing Municipal Government and ByteDance – specifically their construction site at Lanjing Lijia. At 2 AM on a weekend, excavators are working nonstop. The site is barely 200–300 meters from my home. How are people supposed to sleep? I filed a complaint with 12345 before. Their official response was: “This is a key municipal infrastructure project. Legal working hours are 6 AM – 10 PM, including weekends and public holidays (May Day, etc.).” That already made me furious. But now – weekend, 2 AM – they’re digging like it’s noon. Totally unacceptable. I recorded a video and posted it on domestic social media. Then Xiaohongshu banned my account – my video is invisible to others. That tells me one thing: the Beijing government saw my post. They chose to silence me instead of fixing the problem. As of now, my 12345 complaint is still unanswered – zero response. I never wanted to take extreme measures. But you leave me no choice. --- #Beijing# #ByteDance# #NoisePollution# #SilencingCitizens# #LanjingLijia# #12345# #RightToSleep#
Show more
I'm a cardiologist. You've been told the golden rule of sleep is eight hours. New data says you've been optimizing the wrong number. It's not how long you sleep. It's how consistently. Researchers strapped accelerometers on 60,977 adults and tracked over 10 million hours of sleep for six years. They scored each person on sleep regularity — how closely their bed and wake times matched from one day to the next. The result should change your entire approach to rest: The most consistent sleepers had a 20 to 48% lower risk of dying from any cause than the most chaotic ones. 16 to 39% lower cancer mortality. 22 to 57% lower cardiometabolic mortality — the heart disease and stroke I treat every day. And here's the part that overturns conventional wisdom: sleep regularity predicted survival better than sleep duration. The clock you keep mattered more than the hours you logged. Dr. Ryan McCormick captured it perfectly: a consistent, good-quality 6.5 hours a night — same bedtime, same wake time — probably carries less risk than a fragmented, anxious 8-hour routine, or a pattern where your sleep swings wildly night to night. Read that again. A steady 6.5 may beat a chaotic 8. Here's why, as a cardiologist. Your entire body runs on a circadian clock. Blood pressure, heart rhythm, hormone release, glucose metabolism, cellular repair — all timed to a 24-hour rhythm anchored by when you sleep and wake. When that timing is consistent, every system synchronizes. When it swings — late Friday, early Monday, 2 AM one night and 10 PM the next — you inflict "social jet lag" on your body. Your heart never gets its stable nightly recovery. Metabolism destabilizes. Inflammation rises. The chaos is the damage. Not the hours. There's also a warning buried in this — one I see more and more in practice. Orthosomnia: anxiety about achieving perfect sleep, usually driven by obsessively tracking a wearable. People lie awake stressed that they didn't hit their eight hours or their deep-sleep target — and the stress itself wrecks the sleep. Chasing the perfect number can be worse than the imperfect sleep you're chasing it away from. So stop white-knuckling the duration. Here's what actually moves the needle: Pick a bedtime and a wake time. Hold them within about an hour — including weekends. Consistency is the lever, and it's the one you can actually control. You can't always dictate how long you sleep. Stress, kids, work, and biology don't negotiate. But you can almost always control when you lie down and when you get up. That's the finding that matters: the most powerful sleep intervention isn't a longer night. It's a regular one. Same bedtime. Same wake time. Every day. Your heart keeps time whether you tell it to or not. Give it a rhythm it can count on.
Show more
2AM 15th anniversary 🕑✨ IAM 💖 @voice_2am
0
42
1.4K
539
Forward to community