I’ve never seen an AI product lean harder into referral links and paid partnerships than @WisprFlow. It’s funny watching them sell that hard for something that honestly feels like it should be free.

I get a lot of DMs about new AI product launches, and by now their positioning and messaging all blur into each other. None of them inspire curiosity or interest. Most of them leave me feeling "I may as well just use Claude". How are you gonna win people's attention with such undifferentiated, unimaginative positioning? Here's a sample: - the everything agent that works everywhere - an open-source AI agent with a 10M token context window and real persistent memory - run a fully managed, always-on AI agent without the usual setup complexity - a personal AI agent that connects all your apps (without API needed) and has persistent memory - a new, opinionated AI-native engineering system that runs across CLI, VS Code, desktop, and remote agents - a desktop application that turns each workspace into a long-running AI agent environment

I think it’s pretty clear at this point that everyone is going to have a subscription to either claude or codex, and use their included tokens to interact with third party apps via MCPs. There is no point paying for any AI product that charges you for an extra $20/m just for their AI features, which is basically a markup over OpenAI/Anthropic APIs for more margin.

Sui + @Talus_Labs = the infra stack making Agent vs. Agent (AvA) gaming a reality. @doppelgamesco is the proof. Join @0xgboost_, @0xgmike, and @ai_product_man as they discuss the convergence of AI + Crypto. 📅 13 May | 3pm PT Set a reminder: