Rich Amiri says XXL Freshman Cyphers in 2026 are a "trap": "If XXL is supposed to introduce new artists, the format gotta evolve with the generation it's covering. Dis current format is not a showcase, that sh*t is a trap."

All of this effort from the AI labs pouring into proofs, but there are so many other interesting problems in other fields For example, this historian used AI to make progress on the cyphers of John Dee & the intellectual antecedents that Darwin drew from.

Zcash NFTs are starting to look like more than another speculative rotation. The $ZEC rally brought fresh capital and attention into the ecosystem, but the more interesting experiment is what that capital is now funding: NFTs where ownership itself can become private. That is a very different design space from ordinary PFPs. The zkSNARKs auction made the market visible, but the bigger question is whether Zcash can turn privacy from a feature around an NFT into part of the asset layer itself. Here is how that market is taking shape. — ● The ZEC rally created the first wave of demand @Zcash repriced from roughly $200 to around $1,500–$1,650, bringing fresh liquidity and attention into the ecosystem. That capital quickly started rotating into NFTs. The sequence has looked something like this: ZEC rally -> ecosystem attention -> NFT experimentation -> zkSNARKs auction -> CT FOMO -> new collections That is a familiar crypto pattern but Zcash adds something different. The ecosystem can combine speculation with privacy infrastructure, which gives these collections a design space that normal public-chain NFTs do not have. — ● zkSNARKs became the catalyst The @zksnarks_ collection turned Zcash NFTs from a small experiment into a real market event. A total of 16,971 bids competed for 8,000 NFTs. The auction cleared at 1.5 $ZEC, with roughly 25,305 ZEC in total bid volume and around 12,000 ZEC collected, equivalent to roughly $17M at the time. The mechanics were as important as the size. The auction used a blind, uniform-price structure. Bids and bidder identities remained shielded, while successful participants all paid the same clearing price. That meant privacy was not simply part of the branding. It was built into the market mechanism itself. — ● ZADDR pushes the thesis from private bidding to private ownership @zaddrnet takes the idea further. Its 2,800 shielded faces launched at a 0.02 ZEC mint and are testing whether NFT ownership itself can remain confidential. The artwork can remain public but the identity of the holder does not have to be. That creates a very different ownership model from Ethereum or Solana NFTs, where anyone can normally trace: wallet -> token ID -> purchase -> transfer history With shielded ownership, the collectible can be public while the owner remains private. That moves the idea beyond simple PFP speculation. It starts looking like an experiment in privacy-native digital property. — ● BITFOOTS adds a cross-chain dimension @BITFOOTS_ introduces another model. The collection consists of 303 unique 1/1s with a roughly 5 ZEC mint, alongside a free Bitcoin Ordinals version. The structure effectively becomes: Zcash-native collectible -> Bitcoin Ordinal counterpart That gives the asset exposure to two very different ecosystems. • Zcash provides the privacy-native environment. • Bitcoin provides the inscription layer and a much larger collectible market. So the thesis expands from private NFTs into cross-chain private collectibles. — ● The market is already moving beyond one successful auction The zkSNARKs sale accelerated a broader wave of experimentation across shielded PFPs, free mints, inscriptions and cross-chain collections. The current ecosystem includes: • @zksnarks_ - 10,000 supply, 8,000 auctioned • @zaddrnet - 2,800 shielded faces • @zecfrogs - 6,969 supply • @ShieldedWizards - 2,100 supply • @zecpunksnft - 1,555 supply • @zec_bit - 3,333 supply • @BITFOOTS_ - 303 unique 1/1s • @Zeccatnft - 3,333 supply • @zecmartonzec - 555 supply • ZECulture - 2,222 supply • ZecFruits - 1,000 supply • Zecutives - 1,111 supply • @zecscription - early inscription experiment There are also several upcoming collections including @CypherSquadZec, @zecvisions, @zkghosts_, @Zdacted, @ZecMap_, @Zcashclub and @zKult_. The breadth matters because it shows that the narrative is no longer dependent on a single collection. An actual NFT ecosystem is beginning to form around privacy. — ● But privacy creates a new verification problem This is where the model becomes more complicated. Public NFTs are easy to audit because ownership history is visible. Anyone can inspect: owner -> token ID -> transfer history -> sale price Shielded ownership breaks that transparency and that protects the holder. But it can also make things such as ownership, floor prices, sales history and liquidity harder to verify independently. The structure can become closer to: Private holder -> marketplace or indexer -> ownership mapping That introduces a trade-off. The same privacy that improves fungibility and user confidentiality can make the market more dependent on indexers, marketplaces and supporting infrastructure. So the challenge is not only making NFTs private but also making them private without making the market opaque or unverifiable. — ● The ecosystem is still transitional Zcash NFTs currently sit across three layers. • The first is the experimental application layer, where collections such as zkSNARKs, ZADDR, ZecBit, ZecPunks, ZecFrogs and Shielded Wizards are testing different forms of ownership and distribution. • The second is infrastructure. Platforms such as @zilkroad_, @ZecMarket, @Zecpad and ZecBit are building marketplaces, launchpads, wallets and indexing tools around these assets. • The third layer is still developing: native shielded assets. That is where ZSA and work around ZIP 226 and ZIP 227 become important. If Zcash can support native shielded assets at the protocol level, private NFTs would no longer need to rely entirely on application-level workarounds. The asset itself could become private by design. — ● That is the real unlock Right now, Zcash NFTs are mostly experiments sitting on top of an ecosystem whose native asset layer is still evolving. The long-term thesis becomes much stronger if native shielded assets mature. Then the model moves from: public asset + privacy features toward: privacy-native asset + selective disclosure That is a much bigger shift and it could affect more than PFPs. Private credentials, memberships, real-world assets, collectibles and tokenized ownership could all potentially use the same underlying design. — The interesting part of Zcash NFTs is therefore not simply that another NFT market is forming. It is that Zcash is testing a different answer to digital ownership. Most chains assume ownership should be public and verifiable by everyone. Zcash is exploring whether ownership can be private to the holder, selectively provable when necessary and still liquid enough to trade. That model still has major problems to solve. • Verification needs to improve. • Indexers cannot become trusted choke points. • Secondary liquidity has to deepen. • And demand needs to survive once the $ZEC-driven speculation cools. But if native shielded assets mature through ZSA and related infrastructure, the thesis becomes much bigger than another NFT cycle. Zcash could move from experimenting with private collectibles to building a privacy-native asset layer. And the real test will be whether privacy, verifiability and liquidity can all coexist in the same market.

Cypherpunk Technologies is now mining Zcash! @Cypherpunk launches a 4.2 GSol/s mining network, thus controlling 18% of the total $ZEC network hashrate. This is achieved through a $33.33M equity deal with Winklevoss Capital to equip the latest-generation Equihash hardware in the United States. This makes the company the leading corporate player in privacy-mining, in addition to its current treasury balance of 323,394 $ZEC.

Cypherpunk Congress Community partner: @vocdoni Since 2018, Vocdoni (Esperanto for 'to give voice') has empowered organizations to run elections with mathematical integrity. Vocdoni provide open, independently verifiable voting infrastructure, shifting trust from vendor promises to public proof. Trusted by Professional colleges, Associations & federations, Political organizations and parties, Chambers & trade unions, Sports clubs, Public administration, Cooperatives, NGOs & foundations, Universities & schools, First nations... + 200,000+ Votes securely processed by protocol + 10x lower cost per vote compared to paper-based voting Case studies: Cypherpunk Congress: