(Teaser) [MOVE TO PERFORMANCE] Hearts2Hearts(하츠투하츠) - Pretty Please (4K) #Hearts2Hearts# #하츠투하츠# #H2H# #PrettyPlease# #Hearts2Hearts_PrettyPlease# #MOVETOPERFORMANCE#

LE SSERAFIM's 'MOVE TO PERFORMANCE' hits 20 MILLION views! MOVE TO PERFORMANCE <LE SSERAFIM 'BOOMPALA'> 조회수 2000만 돌파🧘‍♀️ ▶ #MOVE_TO_PERFORMANCE# #LE_SSERAFIM# #BOOMPALA# #르세라핌# @le_sserafim #STUDIOCHOOM#

Jack Dorsey on the 12 habits that will make you a better leader Jack reads the following from The Score Takes Care of Itself by former 49ers coach Bill Walsh: 1. Be yourself. “You must be the best version of yourself that you can be... If you’re faking it, you’ll be found out.” 2. Be committed to excellence. “At all times, in all ways, your focus must be on doing things at the highest possible level.” 3. Be positive. “There is a constructive place for censure and highlighting negative aspects of a situation, but too often it is done simply to vent and creates a barrier between you and others.” 4. Be prepared. “Good luck is a product of good planning.” 5. Be detail-oriented. “Organizational excellence evolves from the perfection of details relevant to performance and production.” 6. Be organized. “You must think clearly with a disciplined mind, especially in regard to the most efficient and productive use of time and resources.” 7. Be accountable. “Excuse making is contagious. Answerability starts with you. If you make excuses so will those around you.” 8. Be near-sighted and far-sighted. “Keep everything in perspective while simultaneously concentrating fully on the task at hand… All efforts and plans should be considered not only in terms of short-run effect, but also in terms of how they impact the organization long term.” 9. Be fair. “I believe your value system is as important to success as your expertise… Be clear in your own mind as to what you stand for. And then stand up for it.” 10. Be firm. “I would not budge one inch on my core values, standards, and principles.” 11. Be flexible. “Consistency is crucial, but you must be quick to adjust to new challenges that defy the old solutions.” 12. Believe in yourself. “To a large degree, a leader must ‘sell’ himself to the team. This is impossible unless you exhibit self-confidence.” 13. Be a leader (bonus). “You must know where you’re going and how you intend to get there... You must be able to inspire and motivate through teaching people how to execute their jobs at the highest level. You must care about people and help those people care about one another and the team’s goals. And you must never second-guess yourself on decisions you make with integrity, intelligence, and a team-first attitude.” Jack also walks through the 10 things leaders SHOULD NOT do: 1. Exhibit patience, paralyzing patience. 2. Engage in delegating—massive delegating—or conversely, engage in too little delegating. 3. Act in a tedious, overly cautious manner. 4. Become best buddies with certain employees. 5. Spend excessive amounts of time socializing with superiors or subordinates. 6. Fail to continue hard-nosed performance evaluations of longtime—”tenured”—staff members, the ones most likely to go on cruise control, to relax. 7. Fail to actively participate in efforts to appraise and acquire new hires. 8. Trust others to carry out your fundamental duties. 9. Find ways to get out from under the responsibilities of your position, to move accountability from yourself to others—the blame game. 10. Promote an organizational environment that is comfortable and laid-back in the misbelief that the workplace should be fun, lighthearted, and free from appropriate levels of tension and urgency. And lastly, he shares six points from how General Patton ran his army during World War I: 1. Remember that praise is more valuable than blame 2. Use every means before and after combat to tell troops what they’re going to do and what they have done 3. Discipline is based on pride in the profession of arms, on meticulous attention to details, and on mutual respect and confidence 4. Officers must assert themselves by example and by voice 5. General officers must be seen in the front line during action 6. There’s a tendency for the chain of command to overload junior officers by excessive requirements in the way of training and reports Source: @ycombinator (Oct 2013)

on "Pacing the Frontier" (My view on the state of play.) Internally, Anthropic and OpenAI (and emergingly SpaceXai) are 1 to 2 generations ahead of what's available to external parties. They are banking a lead against the openweight model providers as well as the fine-tuners developing for specific verticals. Recursive self-improvement is a myth, but having access to wildly performant internal tooling, plus being able to access that tooling at cash cost rather than paying margin on top, gives their staff accelerating advantage versus the rest of the market. Hence this year's wild performance gains, many of which delivered to customers. The recent series of model releases and optimizations that have accelerated cost-performance improvements to 99.99% per year were partly catalyzed by OpenAI trying to reel in Anthropic commercially but are also driving continued market expansion. Demand is skyrocketing, the frontier lab companies see amazing margins since they are forced to price against a scarce compute resource. Additional releases could drive even better margins, but the capability of this next set of systems could well result in accidental botnet infestations being unleashed by unwitting customers. Such an occurrence would impose huge political as well as civic liability on the closed labs, so they need to co-agree not to jockey for position as they clean up that liability. If botnet infestations are an inevitability, much much better that the first notable large-scale attack comes from an openweight model. Better still if the closed labs then have the tool available that can clean it up and help to protect the rest of the world's vulnerable infrastructure. If, on the other hand, any of the US labs are the cause of the economically costly disruption, it will be very difficult for even a more blameless US lab to charge for the solution without facing severe political (and potentially regulatory) blowback. They've built a lead, better now to let their common enemies cross the dangerous threshold first while internally compounding their own advantage against the rest of the field. Moreover, the safe solution that they propose--the tool to fix the botnet infestations--will be an AI tool paired with an AI monitoring tool that will probably have to be run on their own infrastructure. I could imagine zero-data-retention-pledging mechanisms by which they could try to launch such a product but it would certainly be more expensive--also possible that palantir could provide more enterprise-friendly monitoring attachments, but those will almost certainly be less performant than vertically integrated solutions. In effect, just like the harness provided the closed labs with a higher degree of defensibility in terms of their business, the safety harness will similarly expand their entrenchedness. If there is some semi-co-opted regulatory apparatus that has to approve and monitor the safety harnesses, even more so! Net, I would expect that the blistering pace of cost declines will dampen somewhat. In 2025 we were experiencing performance doublings every 1.5 months. In 2026, on the agentic benchmarks, doublings were coming every 4 weeks(!) If every other doubling is now eaten up by safety investments we could move to a 2 month doubling pace, a paltry 98% annualized cost decline. Net the effective productivity delivery per GW could slow slightly, but considering the blistering pace of growth of the market overall, I don't think that it will that meaningfully impact the trajectory of corporate uptake and topline growth. If the botnet infestation concern does manifest, the closed lab providers will be extremely well set up to provide hardening and protection. Datacenters are far and away the most likely unintentional attack target though there could also be infestations of end-point infrastructure (your smart home stereo is burning more power because it has also been co-opted to run a VM for a little bot doing some sort of inane classification task at massive scale). (The more obviously politically salient targets are much more likely to be intentionally attacked rather than submit to unintentional infestation and so will almost certainly be performed on open weight models.) I do think that space supercompute will prove more robust to botnet parasitic drag than will terrestrial datacenters due to its modularity and infrastructural simplicity (you won't see a botnet penetrate a satellite system via its air-conditioning system; whereas for a terrestrial datacenter that sort of thing may be the most likely penetration vector.) I do think its wise for the closed model providers to seek a way to coordinate a slowdown, so they can let one of the openweight guys Wile E. Coyote off a cliff. On the margin, SpaceX is probably most advantaged, as they get a little more time to pull fully abreast at the frontier and likely have the more hardened infrastructure stack go-forward. Most regulatory outcomes would favor the incumbents with a lead, though by allowing them to pad their margins rather than drive top-line as aggressively. There remains a tail-risk regulatory clampdown outcome, which would be terrible for humanity, denying all of the benefits while exposing us to essentially the same level of risk. I don't think that is the likely case, however, in part because the tools are already proving so useful to so many.

Dutch protest singer Sophie Straat has sparked controversy after twice telling "all white men" to move to the back of the crowd during her performances. At the Best Kept Secret Festival in the Netherlands last month, Straat asked "all white men" to step back so that a mosh pit could be reserved for women, queer people and people of color. She repeated the same call this week during her performance at the Ghent Festival (Gentse Feesten) in Belgium, again asking white men to move aside to create a temporary mosh pit for those groups. She also urged the audience to "put yourselves in other people's shoes more often," saying the aim was to create space for people who often feel excluded or unsafe in mosh pits. The remarks triggered hundreds of complaints in the Netherlands and nearly 200 complaints in Belgium, with critics arguing that the comments targeted people on the basis of race and sex. Belgium's anti-discrimination body Unia and the Dutch discrimination reporting center concluded they would not pursue the matter, saying there was no evidence that white men were actually excluded from the concerts and that the remarks were made in the context of an artistic and political performance. Meanwhile, the Dutch Public Prosecution Service is reviewing multiple criminal complaints over Straat's remarks at Best Kept Secret and has said it has not yet determined whether any criminal offense was committed.