AI builders rely on a cloud that moves at their pace. Today, IREN takes another step forward with the completion of our acquisition of Mirantis. By bringing together IREN’s owned and operated data centers and compute with Mirantis’ flexible, interoperable software layer, we’re giving customers greater choice and control in how they deploy and scale AI workloads. Developers and enterprises want flexibility as the AI landscape evolves. We're building an open foundation that grows with you, so you’re ready for what's next. Read more:

IREN today reported its FY26 results and provided a business update. Key highlights: - New multi-year AI Cloud contract with a leading frontier AI lab - $4bn contracted ARR for 2026 capacity; $1bn operating ARR today - $2.8bn GPU financing funds 90% of associated GPU capex - 2026 capacity largely sold out; late-stage discussions over a significant portion of 2027 capacity - Executing global expansion across >5GW data center pipeline - Horizon 1 delivered to Microsoft; Horizon 2-4 targeting delivery in Q4 2026 - Acquisitions of Mirantis and Nostrum completed - NVIDIA Exemplar Cloud status achieved on GB300 NVL72 Management will host a webcast to discuss these updates at 5:00pm ET today, which can be accessed here:  Read more: 

$23 billion in AI infrastructure demand. Then $99 billion the year after. That was the opening salvo from Ben Richardson (@CoreWeave) at RAISE Summit, and the number that silenced the room. Anthropic alone is projected to go from 1.5 gigawatts of compute to 10 by 2027. The equivalent of building today's Google, from scratch, in two years. Four companies racing to do the same simultaneously. @JeremieEO (@SemiAnalysis), June Paik (@FuriosaAI ), Vik Malyala (@Supermicro), @alex_saroyan (@netris_io), and Shaun O'Meara (@MirantisIT) unpacked what that actually requires, the energy, the infrastructure, the supply chain, and why none of it was built for this moment. Watch the full session: #ReliveRAISE#

I thought this was an interesting slide from Piper Sandler showing the new AI infrastructure stack. $IREN sits in Layer 1: Power, Grid & Real Estate. $CRWV and $NBIS sit further up the stack in both Layer 6, Orchestration & Workloads, and Layer 7, GPUaaS & Cloud. What’s also worth noting is that IREN has now acquired Mirantis, which Piper places in Layer 6. So IREN now has exposure at both ends of the stack, from the physical infrastructure at the bottom to orchestration and workloads further up. Source: Piper Sandler & StockSavvyShay

$CRWV Goldman Fireside Chat Takeaways (And what this means for $NBIS) 🌲 Shift to Greenfield Datacenters At the end of 2025, $CRWV still explicitly disclosed that all of its existing datacenters were leased. Land, power, and the physical shell run roughly 20% of all in AI infrastructure capex. The remaining 80% goes into GPUs. Having 3P fund the buildout means the same dollar of upfront CAPEX supports roughly 25% more deployed GPUs. The problem is that capital efficiency comes at the expense of long-term margins. The developer needs to earn a return on the infrastructure it funded, leaving lease payments embedded in $CRWV’s cost structure for years after the facility comes online. Now with power and land becoming scarce, developers have more pricing power, making long duration leases more margin dilutive. Intrator does a lot of hand waving, but the reason for pivot is that as you scale into bulk of active capacity through 2030, doesn't make sense to have 90+% in colo margin. Even so, $CRWV’s disclosed greenfield pipeline still appears to be under 1GW, and a material chunk of that is held through a JV rather than wholly owned. This is of course a validation of $NBIS's model of anchoring long-term capacity in owned facilities. Similar to how $IREN long eschewed the software layer but eventually acquired Mirantis. 🗺️ Geographic Diversification When pressed on current political climate around datacenters, Intrator states they are very "forward thinking" with over 1GW contracted abroad. $NBIS of course is doing precisely this. Having secured 3GW+, with the majority in owned GW scale greenfield sites in the US, the remaining ~4.5GW of active power by 2030 (forecast by BofA) is expected to be in Europe, Asia, and EMEA. ☁️ Asset Lite Model Intrator first introduced $CRWV Omni on the Q1 call: deploy and operate the full $CRWV cloud stack in customers' own data centers, on their GPUs. First Omni agreement signed in Q2, expected to scale in 2027. This is an identical arrangement to $NBIS's Asset Lite Model. Instead of squirreling away debt in SPVs, you now put leverage entirely on other people's balance sheets. Effectively, you are decoupling your growth trajectory from CAPEX constraints. This trend should accelerate as the AI infrastructure market broadens beyond the handful of larger operators that paved the road and built the first generation of AI clouds and neoclouds. This is only possible because of the strength of the demand curve for compute. There are a shocking number of newer, non-technical entrants with capital and power but little expertise in building and serving enterprise-grade infrastructure. They need someone else’s blueprint, operating layer, and credibility. That is something companies like $NBIS and $CRWV can provide. Some of these firms include Firmus, Firebird, Yotta, Neysa etc. 💽 Managed Inference When asked where the higher-margin software opportunity sits, Intrator's answer was memory, storage, networking, and observability. Not inference. That omission is intentional. $CRWV does have a managed inference product, but it wasn't built in-house. $CRWV Serverless Inference came via the Weights & Biases acquisition. For reference, their catalog serves 18 open models against Token Factory's 60+. $CRWV's managed inference first surfaced on the Q2 earnings call at a $100M ARR run rate. Small in the grand scheme of things, and clearly not a point Intrator pushes vigorously like $NBIS for Token Factory. 💴 GPU Financing Evolves $CRWV lenders are beginning to finance beyond the life of the underlying customer contract. Historically, infrastructure debt was largely matched against contracted revenue. 5YR debt for 5YR contract. The latest facility has an 5YR maturity against customer contracts averaging 3YRs. That means lenders are now taking on renewal risk and willing to underwrite $CRWV's ability to renew or remarket those GPUs after the initial contract expires. The unlock is that $CRWV can use long duration debt to fund shorter term, potentially higher-priced contracts, instead of needing a 5YR hyperscaler or frontier lab commitment every time it wants to lever a GPU deployment. As this financing structure matures, I hope we will see the death of bare metal hyperscaler deals soon.