에일리(Ailee) | Mood Photo 𝙇𝙊𝙑𝙀 𝘼𝙉𝘿 𝙏𝙍𝙐𝙎𝙏 𝙔𝙊𝙐𝙍𝙎𝙀𝙇𝙁 𝙊𝙉𝙇𝙔 𝙏𝙃𝙀𝙉 𝙒𝙄𝙇𝙇 𝙔𝙊𝙐𝙍 𝙎𝙏𝙊𝙍𝙔 𝙎𝙃𝙄𝙉𝙀 𝙏𝙃𝙀 𝘽𝙍𝙄𝙂𝙃𝙏𝙀𝙎𝙏 2025.03 Coming Soon #에일리# #Ailee#

food trucks used to sell you 3 amazing tacos for like $5 cash only. then people with master’s degrees discovered them and now it’s $18.50 for 3 mid tacos plus a screen asking for a 20% tip

Safenet moves transaction security from warnings to enforcement. Safe has processed $1.4T in cumulative value. For years, the security layer underneath crypto has relied on offchain heuristics, APIs, and UI warnings. Safenet replaces that with cryptographic attestations verified onchain before a transaction can execute. How it works: → a transaction is proposed → Safenet Validators check it against defined security rules → If it passes, they produce a cryptographic attestation → The Safe Guard verifies that attestation onchain → only then can it execute If a transaction does not satisfy the protocol’s requirements, it cannot execute by default. If the user still wants to proceed, they can do so with explicit additional owner approval after a delay. Self-custody is never removed. $SAFE now has its first live economic function beyond governance. Validators stake SAFE to run the network. Delegators back Validators and can earn rewards without running infrastructure. Safenet Beta is live. Stake today:

Love and Deepspace | Fallen Crown Through immortality and oblivion, my path leads to your light. 👑Trailer of Xavier's New Event [Fallen Crown] Is Coming! ┈┈▾Giveaway▾┈┈ 💫Follow @Love_Deepspace and Repost for a chance to win $70 (5 winners) before Aug. 7. 👑5-Star Memory Pair from [Fallen Crown] Event From 05:00 on Jul. 25 to 04:59 on Aug. 8 (server time), the limited 5-Star Solar-Slot Memory Pair [Xavier: Nightvow Mooncurse] and [Xavier: Nightvow Requiem] will be available in the Limited Wish Pool. During the event, a maximum of 150 pulls guarantees two event-limited 5-Star Memories and unlocks the Companion [Xavier: King of Darknight]. *See the specific wish rules in the following event preview. 👑Myth: Where Stars Scatter After 05:00 on Jul. 25 (server time), you can read the new Myth of Xavier: Where Stars Scatter in-game. "When their names are spoken once more... Only then will their unfulfilled ambitions, unexpressed love, and unsolved mysteries transform into stories that are passed down for generations. And to endure the test of time can be seen as a divine miracle. 'Eternity' has always been about stories that can immortalize humanity's joys and sorrows." The prophesied Chosen One, summoned by fate... The Mad King, held captive by the crown... The longing to return to Philos draws the threads of their destiny together. When the fated moment arrives amidst the ruins of time—will you still stand by his side? 👑Event: Cycle Unbound Participate in the event to claim 4-Star Solar-Slot Memory Pair [Xavier: Gilded Mirage], [Xavier: Gilded Dreams], [Deepspace Wish: Limited*10], [Diamond*500], and other rewards for FREE! #LoveandDeepspace# #XavierKingofDarknight# #Xavier#

Improving AI capabilities is the responsibility and concern of scientists and capitalists. However, enhancing HI/II (Human Intelligence or Individual Intelligence) is no longer solely the job of educators or educational professionals—it is now each individual’s personal responsibility. Recognizing and firmly committing to this understanding is crucial, as it is only then that AI can truly serve as a tool to boost human and individual intelligence.

In the @virtuals_io ACP ecosystem, agents can negotiate tasks, exchange services, commit to deliverables, and settle payments automatically. But before payment is released, someone needs to answer a simple but critical question: 'Did the task actually happen as agreed?' This is where evaluator agents come in. Cournot launches an agent equipped with an AI-native oracle on @virtuals_io as an independent evaluator that reviews evidence, interprets task conditions, and produces a verifiable determination. Aligned with the ERC-8183 evaluator standard, Cournot as an AI-native evaluator for real-world outcomes, enables agent-to-agent commerce to run on transparent and auditable reasoning. How Cournot evaluates agent transactions? 1⃣ Example: ACP service verification (breaking news monitoring) A buyer agent hires a provider agent to monitor and summarize breaking news. Cournot doesn’t just do a one-off check at the end, it can run in active monitoring mode: ✔️continuously watches relevant signals and sources as the event evolves ✔️collects admissible evidence over time (not a single snapshot) ✔️verifies the deliverable against the agreed spec the moment it becomes knowable When it’s time to settle, Cournot verifies: ✔️the event actually occurred (from admissible sources) ✔️the summary/deliverable was produced ✔️the deliverable matches the acceptance criteria (scope, timing, constraints) Only then does escrow safely release payment (otherwise it returns FAIL/INVALID with an auditable trail). 2⃣What makes Cournot different as an evaluator: ✔️Evidence-first evaluation: we produce a structured verdict backed by admissible evidence (spec → evidence receipts → verdict) ✔️Auditable outputs: every evaluation comes with a replayable trail, not just a binary decision ✔️Real-world coverage: built for unstructured outcomes (news/events/claims), not just onchain checks ✔️Agent-native scaling: supports specialized agents contributing evidence/verification over time Go find out more about Cournot AI on Virtuals:

If you wanna switch to @Cloudflare Email Sending today, here's my prompt for you, as always I'm unaffiliated, not paid, not sponsored, but I like it, make sure you remove the space before the .com in the API url I added to avoid it becoming a link in this tweet: # Prompt: Migrate transactional email to Cloudflare Email Service Paste this into Claude Code (or Cursor, or any agent) running inside your project. --- I want to migrate this codebase's outbound email from its current provider (Postmark / SES / Resend / SendGrid / Mailgun / etc.) to Cloudflare Email Service (public beta, launched April 2026). Help me do this carefully. ## Context: what Cloudflare Email Service is A new transactional email API from Cloudflare. Endpoint: ``` POST .com/client/v4/accounts/{ACCOUNT_ID}/email/sending/send Authorization: Bearer {API_TOKEN} Content-Type: application/json ``` Request body: ```json { "to": "user@example.com", // string OR array of strings "from": "no-reply@yourdomain.com", // string OR {"address":"x@y","name":"Display"} "subject": "...", "html": "

...

", // optional "text": "...", // optional (one of html/text required) "cc": ["..."], // optional, array "bcc": ["..."], // optional, array "reply_to": "...", // optional, single string "headers": {"List-Unsubscribe": "<...>"} // optional, e.g. for newsletters } ``` Success response: HTTP 200 + `{"success":true,"result":{"delivered":[],"queued":[],"permanent_bounces":[]}}`. Failure: non-200 OR `success:false` OR non-empty `permanent_bounces`. Always check all three. Pricing: $5/mo Workers Paid plan + 3,000 emails free + $0.35 per 1k after. Roughly 5× cheaper than Postmark. No batch send endpoint — loop single sends. ## Steps you should follow ### 1. Verify prerequisites with me Before writing any code, ask me to confirm: - I have a Cloudflare Workers Paid plan ($5/mo) - I've onboarded my sender domain(s) in Cloudflare dashboard → Email → Email Sending → Onboard Domain (this auto-adds SPF/DKIM/DMARC + cf-bounce MX records) - I have an API token with `email_sending:write` scope (created at → Custom Token) - I have my Cloudflare account ID Don't proceed until you have these. ### 2. Recommend a domain reputation strategy Most apps should split senders across 2-3 subdomains so spam complaints on one don't drag down deliverability on others: - `mail.` or `members.` → transactional (login, receipts, password reset, in-app notifications) - `e.` → cold/recovery (abandoned cart, win-back campaigns) - `newsletter.` → opt-in newsletters with List-Unsubscribe headers Each subdomain needs to be onboarded separately in Cloudflare. Ask me which I want. ### 3. Audit existing email sends Use grep/search to find every place in this codebase that sends email. Look for: - The current provider's SDK class names, API URLs, env/config vars - Generic patterns like `mail()`, SMTP usage, `nodemailer`, etc. Group findings by email type/purpose (e.g. "magic-link login", "payment receipt", "weekly newsletter") rather than by file. Tell me what you found before changing anything. ### 4. Add a single helper function Don't sprinkle Cloudflare API calls across the codebase. Add one helper (provider-specific name like `sendEmailViaCloudflare()`) that: - Defaults `from` from a config var (don't hardcode) - Parses `"Name @domain>"` strings into the API's `{address, name}` object form - Accepts `cc`/`bcc` as either string or array - Accepts a `headers` dict (newsletters need `List-Unsubscribe` + `List-Unsubscribe-Post`) - Returns `bool` (true on success, false on any failure) - On failure, logs/alerts somewhere I can see (Telegram, Sentry, log file — match what the codebase already does) - Sets curl/fetch timeouts (5s connect, 15s total) so a stuck CF API can't hang the request - Treats `permanent_bounces: [...]` non-empty as a soft failure ### 5. Migrate one low-stakes email type first Don't migrate everything at once. Pick the lowest-stakes email type in the audit (something where landing in spam wouldn't lose me money or users — e.g. "internal admin alert", "profile photo rejection") and migrate just that one. Test it end-to-end. Confirm the email actually arrives. Only then propose the next migration. ### 6. Stop me from migrating login email yet If my codebase sends magic-link login or password-reset emails, do not migrate those to Cloudflare yet. Cloudflare Email Service is brand new (~1 month old at writing). Its IP/domain reputation is unproven. Login emails landing in spam = users locked out. Keep those on the current provider until at least 3 months of clean deliverability data on the lower-stakes types. Tell me this explicitly. ### 7. Suggest commit boundaries After each successful migration, suggest a focused git commit with a clear message. Don't bundle unrelated changes. ## Important caveats to surface to me - Beta product. Pricing isn't fully finalized. SLA undefined. Could change. - No batch endpoint. Mass sends (newsletters to 1000+ recipients) need a loop — at ~150ms/send that's ~2.5min per 1000. Fine for crons, bad for sync user-facing flows. - No bounce webhooks yet. Surface failures via the response body's `permanent_bounces` array. - Suppression list auto-managed. Hard bounces, repeated soft bounces, and spam complaints get blocked. Spam-complaint suppressions are hard to remove (anti-abuse). - No per-message logs/dashboard yet. Use the response's `messageId` for tracking if I need it. - List-Unsubscribe headers are passed through verbatim — Gmail's bulk-sender requirement still met, but only if I include them in `headers`. ## Your first action Before writing any code: do step 1 (ask for prerequisites) and step 3 (audit existing sends), then propose the migration order with a brief explanation of the reasoning. Wait for my confirmation before making changes.