Check your phone's settings to ensure that Wireless Emergency Alerts are enabled. These important notifications can save lives and keep you safe. Learn more: #ReadyMA#

This week when you're shopping, buy at least one extra item that you'd need for your pets during emergencies such as food, treats, toys and other supplies. 🐕 #ReadyMA# #EmergencyPreparednessMonth#

Pets are important members of many households, and, like people, they are affected by disasters. 🐈 Take a few minutes this week to make an emergency plan for your pets and service animals. 🐶 Plan for what you'd need and where you'd take them. ✔️ Learn more: #ReadyMA#

What would you need if your home lost power, cell service, and internet for a day — or even a week? Take time to review your safety plans and update your supplies to ensure you're prepared. ✔️ Learn more: #ReadyMA#

What should you do if there was an earthquake, tornado, or flash flood? Talk with your family about what to do before, during, and after different types of emergencies and severe weather. 📝 Learn more: #ReadyMA#

Governor Maura Healey has proclaimed September 2026 as Emergency Preparedness Month in Massachusetts! 📢 Over the next several weeks, MEMA and other emergency management partners will share vital tips to help you and your family stay safe during disasters and emergencies. ✔️ Learn more at #ReadyMA#

Bitcoin : Volatility Isn’t the Problem. Perfect Scarcity Is the Opportunity. Mainstream finance still parrots that Bitcoin is “too volatile” to sit beside gold or the largest equities. That collapses the debate into a comparison with low‑beta assets and ignores how we already treat AI semis and high‑beta tech: we tolerate 30–40% drawdowns and fat‑tailed distributions at $5T‑plus valuations and call them core holdings. Volatility clearly isn’t disqualifying when the narrative and mandate are comfortable. The real distinction is category, politics, and perfect scarcity. Semis are equity, with cash‑flow stories and ready‑made slots in growth and tech sleeves. Bitcoin is a non‑yielding, non‑sovereign monetary asset with a hard 21‑million cap and a shrinking effective float. “Too volatile” has mostly been shorthand for “we don’t yet have the regulatory and mandate cover to own this at size.” The Clarity Act changes that: by explicitly recognizing and regulating digital assets, it gives committees the legal and political scaffolding to treat Bitcoin as a legitimate portfolio building block rather than a compliance headache. Once you strip out the mandate excuse, the comparison becomes straightforward. If Bitcoin never reaches gold’s market cap and only trades at roughly Nvidia’s current scale, the implied price is in the area of USD 240,000–250,000 per coin, several times today’s level, entirely on the back of perfect scarcity and normalized access. Full gold parity sits closer to USD 1.5–1.8 million per coin. In a world that already accepts AI‑bubble volatility at multi‑trillion valuations, the idea that volatility alone should cap Bitcoin far below those ranges isn’t risk analysis; it’s monetary politics pretending to be risk analysis.