🚨🇷🇺🇰🇵 NATO IN PANIC: NORTH KOREAN LAUNCHERS COULD GIVE RUSSIA NEW BALLISTIC MISSILE FORCE Russia is reportedly set to receive additional North Korean launchers for KN-23 and KN-24 ballistic missiles. And here's the important part: dedicated transporter-erector-launchers would allow Russian forces to field complete mobile units around them without increasing the burden on Russia’s Iskander brigades. 🔸 The main bottleneck has been the launcher fleet. Missiles can be stored and transported separately, but they cannot become a sustained battlefield force without heavy mobile platforms able to move, hide, erect and fire them. 🔸 Original North Korean launchers would allow KN-23 and KN-24 batteries to disperse across a wider area, relocate after firing and operate independently of fixed launch sites. 🔸 The solid-fuel KN-23 carries a roughly 500 kg warhead to around 450 km, with longer ranges possible using a lighter payload. Its low, manoeuvring trajectory is designed to make interception more difficult. 🔸 The KN-24 has a range of about 410 km and carries an estimated 400–500 kg payload. Together, the two systems can strike airfields, command posts, logistics hubs and air-defence sites far behind the front. 🔸 Separate Korean-made missile units would expand the number of ballistic strikes Russia can prepare at the same time while preserving Iskander launchers and Russian-made missiles for other missions. 🔸 Pyongyang would gain something equally valuable: real combat data. Every launch provides information on reliability, accuracy, enemy interception attempts and the demands of sustained wartime use — experience no peacetime test range can reproduce. The launchers are what turn imported missiles into a parallel mobile strike force. More firing units, more launch locations and more ballistic threats would make Ukraine’s air-defence planning significantly harder. Which targets are most at risk: airfields, logistics hubs or air-defense sites?

Any geopolitical headlines or handwringing around Russia/NATO is a spectacular opportunity to buy dips. I don’t talk about this (this account is focused on crypto) but I’ve been very plugged into the osint community around the Ukraine conflict since before it even broke out. In the four years it’s been active, Russia hasn’t come close to achieving its operational goals, and the material losses it’s endured are so staggering that it almost defies description. The attrition and lockup of its dwindling resources is in full view, with critical infrastructure getting successfully hit over a thousand km behind front lines. Oil refineries and wildberries is the tip of the iceberg. And sort of implication that Russia is willing to open a second front of hot conflict on a NATO country is genuinely laughable. Crypto dips on this sort of thing are an instant buy

How is China responding to closer Russia–North Korea military cooperation? Join us on Sept. 21 from 9-10am for a live webinar with @sungminchohi and Emma Chanlett-Avery examining China’s policy of tactical ambiguity, Xi Jinping’s recent engagement with Pyongyang, and the implications for regional stability and U.S. policy. I will moderate the discussion. Register below:

"I Need to Be Cloned. Any Medical Professionals Here?" Bastrykin said after someone remarked that Russia needs more officials like him. There are. The required specialty is psychiatry.

CIA DIRECTOR JOHN RATCLIFFE MADE A SURPRISE VISIT TO MOSCOW THIS WEEK TO WARN RUSSIA NOT TO ATTACK NATO COUNTRIES, FOLLOWING NEW U.S. INTELLIGENCE ASSESSMENTS SUGGESTING PUTIN COULD TRY TO TEST NATO'S RESOLVE WITH A LIMITED ATTACK ON AN ALLIED COUNTRY IN THE COMING YEARS. - WSJ