What should be the KPI every solidity compiler team should track that app builders care about? My shortlist: 1. Compile times speed vs solc 2. Solves stack too deep 3. Bytecode size vs solc 4. Security (bit vague) Btw have you tried out any of the new compilers? ---- The compilers: Solc The one we all use. Solc --via-ir ✅ production ready 😀 solves stack too deep ☹️ compile times 10x slow - so almost no one uses it Solc --experimental SSA-CFG ⚙️ experimental mode 😀 solves stack too deep Compile times and bytecode size - TBD. ❗️looking for people to try it out! solx 🛠️ building. By @NomicFoundation + @the_matter_labs 😀 solves stack too deep 😀 decent compile times + bytecode size! ❗️looking for people to try it out! solar 🛠️ building. By @paradigm Too early to tell but fast compile times and stack too deep problem is promised to be solved!

Two weeks ago @real_philogy and I joined Solidity's *PUBLIC* team call to discuss the new release + compiler and it was quite fun. You tried the new SSA-CFG solidity pipeline? Or got a problem in the new release? Go talk about it 🗓️ TOMORROW - 3PM CET

I did it! I've completed the Solidity fundamentals course 🎉 5 hours of resources to learn: - Solidity smart contract development - Blockchain oracles - Smart contract testing and security Completely for free. Check it out 👇

Just opened a small PR to @Uniswap v4-core 👋 Some files were declaring `pragma solidity ^0.8.0` while using `using ... for ... global`, which was introduced in Solidity 0.8.13. The code compiles today due to Foundry using 0.8.26, but the pragma didn’t reflect the actual minimum requirement. PR: Happy to hear any feedback 🙏

Beyond policy, I feel like the two meta-problems that have slowed our industry down the most: - Solidity. Shipping truly safe code on EVM is brutally slow. - Talent attractiveness. Deep technical talent doesn't want to work in crypto. They don't see the impact they could create, they only see speculation. We've failed to make the substance of the work legible to people who could move the frontier.

Been thinking about EVM languages and compilers. New languages are set up to fail. ❌You're not competing with Solidity the language. ✅ You're competing with Solidity the stack. There is the backend, IR, frontend, libraries, tooling, docs, education, auditors, trust. 5+ years to build Everyone wants to roll their own compiler because 'yul sucks'. No one has time for rest of the stack. Negative flywheel kicks in. Lot needs to change. Devex needs to improve.

My latest thinking is centered on Zama's architectural innovations. Unlike L1/L2 solutions, it's a cross-chain confidentiality layer requiring no bridges. It leverages quantum-resistant FHE for end-to-end encryption, supporting Solidity. The integration of MPC for key management and ZK for input validation, coupled with hardware acceleration, is now under deep scrutiny. I'm starting to grasp how this combination aims for high-throughput privacy. Deconstructing Zama's Design I'm focused on the integrated approach of Zama: FHE for encryption, MPC for decentralized key management, and ZK for input validation, all enhanced by hardware acceleration for high performance. This combination enables efficient, scalable, and decentralized privacy computation. Examining Zama's Features I'm focused on Zama's approach to cross-chain confidentiality with quantum-resistant FHE for end-to-end encryption. The support for Solidity development and potential for accelerated performance is a key aspect. I'm exploring the integration of MPC for decentralized key management with ZK for input validation, coupled with hardware acceleration, to overcome traditional privacy computation's scalability issues. Exploring Zama's Advantages I'm now focusing on Zama's concrete advantages, including its hundredfold speedup for Solidity. The synergistic combination of MPC for key management and ZK for input validation, all powered by hardware acceleration, appears to be a real game-changer. This efficient, decentralized approach to privacy computation is really appealing. @zama #ZamaCreatorProgram#

Privacy is the next inevitable paradigm of Web3. Blockchain’s first decade chased full transparency. but now, on-chain privacy has become the core demand for institutions, businesses and regular users. We’re thrilled to launch OpenBuild × Aleo Bootcamp @AleoHQ @Aleo_Asia @Aleo_CH Aleo 101: Build Your First Privacy App From Scratch 🗓 Starts: May 8 ✅ No cryptography background required ✅ Master Leo v4.0 & ZK fundamentals ✅ Full hands-on: setup → coding → deployment ✅ Build & launch your real privacy dApp ✅ Access Aleo ecosystem resources & bounty opportunities Solidity / Rust basic knowledge is all you need to join. Secure your spot now and become a builder in the privacy Web3 era👇

Change is easier to name after it already happened. What is harder is feeling it while it is still moving through daily life, before the old language has caught up to what is actually going on. That is where strength starts to matter. Not because someone decided it should, but because staying with change before it becomes obvious requires something real. Strength is being asked for in a time when the systems around life are still standing, but less and less able to carry what they were built to hold. They still shape daily life. They still hold influence. But they no longer truly serve the needs that created them. They remain anyway. A system can survive for decades while failing the exact needs that created it. That is the pressure underneath what is happening across the world right now. The arguments sound political on the surface, but the force driving them is more basic than ideology. Food. Sleep. Safety. The moment those three become unstable, the structure around them starts shaking too. The systems being used now were not created by accident. They solved real problems for a long time. They organized survival, distributed resources, created stability, and held societies together through periods where humanity still lived inside older limits. Humanity began pushing beyond those structures, and the same systems that once held life together started feeling like limits around it. The systems still speak the language of stability, but larger parts of life are experiencing them as limitation. Not because transcendence suddenly became a mass obsession. Not because the streets are filled with philosophers. Survival pressure reaches the body first. That is why the reactions happening across the world cannot be understood through slogans alone. What gets called populism is usually described as manipulation through ideas, as if large movements happen because a population suddenly gets captured by one philosophy. But underneath the language, the same pressure keeps returning. Something to eat. Somewhere to sleep. A sense of safety about tomorrow. Once those begin weakening, the emotional structure of society changes with them. That is the real force underneath the protests, the instability, the exhaustion, the anger. The argument on the surface is political. The mechanism underneath it is biological. The body reacts long before philosophy catches up. And that is why strength becomes one of the central questions of this period. Not strength as domination. Not strength as performance. Strength as the capacity to remain stable while old structures stop working the way they once did. Strength as the ability to face transition without collapsing into fear, ideology, or blind reaction. The deeper problem is not that humanity created systems. The deeper problem is that humanity is starting to outgrow them while still depending on them to survive. Philosophy becomes dangerous when it explains the world but never gives anyone a way to live. That is where the work has to become practical. Not practical in the shallow sense of turning every idea into a method, but practical in the sense that understanding has to touch action. It has to help life move without becoming another ideology. The point is not to force awareness onto everyone. That already becomes another form of pressure. It starts as consciousness, then becomes demand, then becomes the same old pattern wearing better language. The real task is not to make everyone speak the same language, walk the same path, or enter the same interior process. The real task is to build tools that return agency. That is where strength enters again. Strength is not something that arrives because the whole world finally understands the same thing. Strength has to be built. Made. Chosen into structure. It cannot wait for everyone else to walk the same road before it starts acting. That mistake happens easily when the path becomes personal. Once a certain kind of awareness starts opening, it is easy to imagine that the entire world must open in the same direction. But that assumption comes from being inside the path, not from seeing the whole. Music shows the mistake in a simple way. Some musicians treat one band as if it is the foundation of all real taste. If that band does not move someone, then the judgment comes fast. Maybe that listener does not understand music. Maybe there is no taste there. But that is absurd. Music can still be loved deeply without loving the thing someone else treats as essential. Consciousness work can fall into the same trap. The ones walking that road can start believing everyone else must wake up the same way for the world to change. But most of the world is not here to perform a consciousness process. Many are simply trying to live, eat, sleep, stay safe, and keep life from breaking. So the work cannot be to push everyone into awareness. The work is to translate philosophy into something usable without turning it into ideology. Ideology explains and gathers followers. Philosophy, when it becomes practical, should help create conditions where life can be ruled from within. An idea stays trapped inside philosophy until it can be touched. A board can be explained for hours. The surface, the ink, the chemistry behind why the marks disappear with water. All of that can be described intellectually. But the moment someone writes on the board, erases it with their own hand, and sees it happen directly, the relationship changes. The explanation arrives after contact. Movements can organize around ideas, symbols, language, identity, theory. Philosophy can also stay suspended above life if it never enters action. That is why philosophy cannot end in discussion. Words alone do not feed anyone, protect anyone, or give anyone a place to rest. The point of learning any of this is not to collect better concepts. The point is to turn understanding into action capable of addressing the three pressures that keep shaping human life underneath every ideology. Food. Safety. A place to sleep. Most of humanity is not waiting for a spiritual framework or a philosophical answer before the end of the month arrives. Most are trying to survive long enough to breathe. That is the ground every system eventually answers to whether it admits it or not. So the responsibility falls differently on the ones asking deeper questions. Not to force everyone into awareness. Not to hand out manuals telling everyone exactly what to do. The point is to awaken enough inner potential to build something real wherever that potential exists. Different places. Different projects. Different forms. But all rooted in the same movement from understanding into manifestation. History shows the same mechanism again and again. Revolutions are remembered through philosophers because philosophers later gave language to what happened. But the pressure underneath the movement usually began somewhere more immediate. Hunger moves faster than theory. The French Revolution did not begin because whole populations suddenly became intellectually devoted to republican philosophy. Bread disappeared. Survival pressure intensified. The body reached its limit first. Then philosophy entered the opening created by that pressure and helped shape a new structure afterward. That is the sequence history keeps revealing. Need arrives first. Theory comes later, once pressure has already opened a space where the old structure can no longer carry what life is asking from it. That is why awakening cannot remain internal only. Understanding has to become capable of building conditions where human beings can eat, rest, and feel safe again. Once those conditions stabilize, another kind of question finally becomes possible. Then philosophy stops being a luxury suspended above survival and becomes something life can actually reach toward. That brings the whole question back to strength. Because strength is still being imagined through the logic of conflict. Through resistance. Through opposition. Through the belief that change only happens when enough force gathers together against an enemy. That idea shaped civilizations for thousands of years. Entire societies were organized around territory, conquest, defense, survival through dominance. Unity became associated with war because survival depended on collective force. The stronger side won resources, protection, land, continuity. That logic stayed inside institutions long after the battles themselves changed form. It still shapes the imagination now. The phrase “unity creates strength” carries that older structure underneath it. A group gathers. An enemy appears. Pressure builds. Victory belongs to the strongest side. Even many movements trying to create change still unconsciously operate through that same architecture. But something stops working once reality begins changing faster than the structures built to contain it. Strength cannot continue meaning permanent combat against something outside. That model eventually traps everything inside reaction. Every movement needs an enemy to survive. Every identity needs opposition to hold itself together. Every system starts feeding on conflict because conflict becomes the source of coherence. Then the search for blame never ends. Another hidden group. Another controlling force. Another secret structure somewhere behind reality pulling the strings. The mind keeps looking for one thing to fight because the older idea of strength depends on having an opponent. But most of the systems shaping life now do not function through one hidden controller standing above everyone else. Power became structural long ago. Institutions, economies, governments, corporations, universities, media systems, political movements, cultural pressures. All of them interact and reinforce each other at different moments. There will always be individuals trying to gain influence or control, but reducing reality to one enemy keeps attention trapped in reaction when creation is the work being asked for. That is why blame cannot become the center of transformation. The moment all energy gets organized around fighting shadows, inner strength starts depending on the existence of an opponent. Then identity itself needs conflict in order to feel purpose. These times require another kind of strength. Not the strength of domination. Not the strength of the strongest male entering battle to conquer territory. Not the strength of permanent resistance. The old model can destroy structures, but it does not automatically know how to build new ones afterward. And that is the part becoming unavoidable now. No matter how much collapse, corruption, instability, or exhaustion becomes visible in the world, the real question remains the same. What can actually be built differently? What can sustain life differently? What can create food, rest, safety, and direction without reproducing the same structures again under new names? That work cannot come only from opposition. It has to come from inner stability strong enough to create without needing an enemy in order to move. The path turns inward before it turns outward, not as escape from the world, but because anything built externally without inner foundation eventually recreates the same patterns it tried to escape. That is where strength connects to power. Power outside and power inside are not the same movement. The older meaning of power was tied to mastery, ownership, authority over something beyond the self. To rule. To direct the destiny of others. That is still the structure behind political power, institutional power, governmental power. A population hands its will to someone else and trusts that structure to decide direction, protection, order, and future on its behalf. But that transfer happens more easily when inner strength is weak. The problem is not only that power concentrates outside. The deeper problem is that uncertainty inside makes external authority feel necessary. The less inner structure exists, the easier it becomes to search for someone else to hold direction together. That is why strength cannot mean aggression. Strength is construction. A structure becomes strong when all its parts hold together tightly enough that pressure cannot immediately break it apart. The image behind the word points toward solidity. Something difficult to move. A mountain. Stone bound by weight, pressure, and coherence. Yet real strength goes further than remaining unmoved. The same inner coherence that keeps a thing from breaking can also make action more precise and less scattered. It does not fight the mountain from every direction. It stands from one center long enough for what seemed fixed to begin shifting. This is why ancient civilizations built on elevated ground, surrounded by walls, towers, and fortresses. Not only for military defense. The fortress stood as a living image of stability. A place that held firm against chaos from the outside. A place from which danger could be seen in advance. A place where others could rest because something solid existed at the center. The same architecture exists inside a human being. Self knowledge starts building that fortress inside the being. The more disconnected someone becomes from inner history, inner structure, and inner understanding, the easier external forces begin shaping identity, decisions, reactions, and perception. That is why forgetting becomes dangerous. A human being disconnected from memory, history, and self understanding becomes easier to direct because nothing stable remains underneath the pressure. The center weakens. Then identity gets assembled externally through systems, trends, slogans, fears, distractions, and emotional reactions arriving from outside. Strength begins disappearing long before freedom disappears. And that is why education matters far beyond information alone. Knowledge by itself does not automatically create strength. Entire systems can produce enormous amounts of surface knowledge while avoiding the deeper process of helping someone know themselves. Facts can be memorized without ever constructing an inner foundation capable of standing on its own. But the moment self knowledge begins deepening, direction stops depending entirely on external authority. Inner power starts appearing because awareness begins organizing the structure from within instead of waiting for identity to be handed over from outside. That is the real meaning behind this movement toward strength. Not collective aggression against an enemy. Not building another ideology. Not replacing one ruler with another ruler. Real strength appears when the being becomes stable enough internally that power no longer has to be surrendered outward in exchange for direction. Ignorance hands power away. Self knowledge takes it back.