Register and share your invite link to earn from video plays and referrals.

Search results for TribalLands
TribalLands community
One keyword maps to one global community path.
Create community
People
Not Found
Tweets including TribalLands
CAL FIRE is investing in California's Native American tribes through grant funding that supports wildfire prevention, fuels reduction, equipment, training, and landscape restoration projects. These partnerships help strengthen the health of tribal lands while making surrounding communities more resilient to wildfire. See how these investments are making an impact in this NBC 7 San Diego story: #TribalLands# #California# #WildfireResilience# #ReadyForWildfire#
Show more
Elouise Cobell and the Missing Money The land was generating wealth everywhere you looked. Oil wells pumped day and night. Ranchers grazed cattle across leased fields. Companies paid royalties, rent, and fees to use Native American land. Yet many of the Native families who owned that land were receiving checks so small they hardly seemed believable. Elouise Cobell looked at those two realities and asked a question that would challenge the United States government for more than fifteen years: Where did the money go? At first glance, Cobell did not appear to be someone preparing for a historic legal battle. She was a mother, a grandmother, and a proud member of the Blackfeet Nation in Montana. She was also highly skilled with numbers. After serving as treasurer of the Blackfeet Tribe, she helped establish the Blackfeet National Bank, one of the first tribally owned banks in the United States. She understood how money should flow when land is productive. For decades, the federal government had managed millions of acres of Native American trust land. While Native Americans remained the rightful owners, federal agencies oversaw many of the leases involving oil companies, ranchers, mining operations, and other businesses. Those businesses paid for access to the land. The government collected those payments and was supposed to distribute the money to the Native landowners. The process sounded straightforward. What Cobell discovered was anything but. She saw active oil production on tribal lands. She saw livestock grazing on leased property. She knew businesses were earning profits from land owned by Native families. Yet many of those families continued to live in poverty. Some struggled to afford basic necessities. Others received payments that seemed impossible when compared with the economic activity taking place on their land. The numbers simply did not add up. Cobell knew that oil generated revenue. Leases generated revenue. Royalties generated revenue. If money was being collected, there should have been records showing exactly where every dollar went. So she began asking for answers. The explanations she received only raised more concerns. Federal officials said the trust system was extremely complicated. Ownership interests had been divided among generations of descendants. Records stretched back decades. Tracking every transaction would be difficult. Cobell was not satisfied. She wanted to see the books. As she dug deeper, she discovered problems far beyond bureaucratic complexity. Records were incomplete. Accounts had been mixed together. Payments could not always be traced. Important documents had disappeared. Some records had been destroyed altogether, while others had deteriorated after years of poor storage conditions involving water damage, mold, and even rodents. The government had managed Native trust funds for generations, yet it could not provide a complete accounting of where all the money had gone. Initially, Cobell tried to push for reform from within the system. She asked questions. She requested records. She pressed officials for explanations. Progress was slow, and accountability seemed even slower. Eventually, she concluded that asking politely was no longer enough. In 1996, she filed a lawsuit against the United States government. The case became known as Cobell v. Babbitt. It was brought on behalf of hundreds of thousands of Native Americans whose Individual Indian Money accounts had been managed by federal agencies. This was not a dispute over a single payment. It was not about one lease or one accounting mistake. The lawsuit challenged the entire system responsible for managing Native trust funds. The government resisted. Attorneys disputed claims, challenged rulings, and argued that reconstructing decades of financial history would be enormously difficult. But Cobell refused to back down. Again and again, she traveled from Montana to Washington, D.C., attending hearings, depositions, negotiations, and court proceedings. She returned with the same demand every time: Show the accounting. As the case progressed, federal judges grew increasingly critical of how the trust accounts had been handled. The courts identified major failures in recordkeeping and management. At various stages of the litigation, senior Interior Department officials were held in contempt during disputes involving court orders and government records. Still, the case dragged on. Presidential administrations came and went. Cabinet officials changed. Government leaders rotated in and out of office. Cobell remained. The lawsuit continued through the Clinton administration, through the Bush administration, and into the Obama administration. More than a decade after filing the case, she was still fighting for answers. Then, in 2009, a breakthrough finally arrived. The Obama administration announced a settlement worth $3.4 billion. The agreement included compensation for Native American trust beneficiaries, funding to address issues involving fractionated land ownership, and financial support for educational scholarships benefiting Native students. Congress approved the settlement in 2010, and President Barack Obama signed it into law. For years, the government had argued that the accounting problem was simply too complex. Elouise Cobell spent fifteen years proving that complexity was not a valid excuse for avoiding accountability. Sadly, she would not live long to see the full impact of her victory. On October 16, 2011, Elouise Cobell died from cancer at the age of sixty-five. The settlement continued to be implemented after her death, and her legacy only grew stronger. The scholarship program established through the settlement would eventually bear her name. The case itself became one of the largest class-action settlements ever involving Native Americans and the federal government. Yet the most remarkable part of the story may be how it began. There were no leaked documents. No secret recordings. No dramatic whistleblower revealing hidden evidence. There was only a woman who understood how numbers worked. She looked at land producing oil. She watched cattle graze on leased property. She saw businesses earning money from Native-owned resources. Then she looked at Native families receiving almost nothing in return. The math did not make sense. Most people would have accepted the explanations and moved on. Elouise Cobell did not. She spent fifteen years forcing one of the most powerful governments on earth to answer a question that Native families had been asking for generations: Where is the money? And she kept asking until the government could no longer avoid the answer.
Show more