[📢YENA] Catch my heart with #WOODZ# (@c_woodzofficial) 🔗 🔗 🔗 #최예나# #예나# #YENA# #우즈# #LOVE_CATCHER# #캐치캐치# #YENA_CatchCatch#

Woody and i and the crowd had a dynamic 2 plus hours of everything… Thank u for having me Was fun sharing some inner stories bout myself #MAGICMANWorldTour# In 3 days THAILAND Feel me Feel my life Hole u can relate See u soon 🙏💋

Cathie Wood just flagged the sleeper trade inside the AI boom that most people are completely missing. Everyone has been chasing GPUs. Nvidia, the data center buildout, the chip arms race. That trade has been obvious for two years. But OpenAI's CFO Sarah Fryer said something quite different: people are going to be really shocked by how agentic AI activates CPUs. Right now, for every CPU in an AI workload, there are 4 to 5 GPUs. That's the current ratio. Wood thinks that ratio is going to 1 to 1. Think about what that means. AI inference at scale, agents running autonomously, pipelines executing tasks across systems. The compute mix shifts dramatically away from pure GPU dominance. CPUs become a first-class citizen in the AI stack. Cathie called it going "back to the future." Intel has taken off. Flex (formerly Flextronics) is booming. Stocks that were giants in the dot-com bubble are resurging because the underlying demand for their products is real again. The GPU trade made sense at the training stage. You need massive parallel compute to train frontier models. But agentic AI runs differently. Agents are constantly orchestrating, reasoning, calling APIs, executing workflows. That workload looks a lot more like traditional computing. And traditional computing runs on CPUs. If Cathie Wood is right about the ratio collapsing to 1:1, the CPU demand signal embedded in the AI buildout is orders of magnitude larger than the market is currently pricing.