In crypto, transparency is easy to claim. The harder part is putting enough information on the table for someone else to actually verify, compare, and question. That’s why Concordium’s latest disclosure matters. CCD is now included in Blockworks’ Token Transparency Framework, and Concordium’s B1 filing has been rated “Complete.” This is not simply another badge to put on a website. The framework asks projects to disclose important information around the token and the entity behind it, including: • Token supply and allocation • Insider lock-ups • Market maker arrangements • Material risks • The entity behind the protocol • Other key token-related disclosures More importantly, the information is presented in a standardised format. That changes the way investors can research projects. Instead of piecing together information from announcements, documentation, forums and scattered sources, they can look at projects using the same disclosure framework and make more informed comparisons. And Blockworks doesn't simply publish whatever a project submits. The filing goes through a review process, including follow-up questions and challenges where answers require clarification. Only then is it classified as Complete or Partial. The numbers put this into perspective. As of August 21, the dashboard had 113 disclosures, including 76 B1 filings. Only 26 B1 filings were rated Complete. Concordium’s CCD filing is one of them. But the most meaningful part isn't the label. It's the principle behind it. Crypto needs an environment where investors don't have to rely solely on narratives, marketing or social media to understand what they're buying. Good disclosure gives people the information to ask better questions. And the real test of transparency isn't what a project publishes once. It's whether the information continues to hold up as the ecosystem evolves. That is the standard that matters. @Concordium putting CCD through a structured, public disclosure process is a meaningful step toward making token transparency something measurable rather than something projects simply claim. Less opacity. More information. Better questions. Better-informed markets. That is what transparency should be about. #Concordium# #Blockchain# #ConcordiumAmbassador#

Why did Intel abandon EMIB for their 2027 Diamond Rapids CPU? Uniform Memory Access. All CPU cores in each CBB can access all 16 memory channels with a single hop. UCIe-S through the substrate was required to route signals underneath the near-IMH to the far-IMH with about 30mm of reach to achieve this. In contrast AMD's Venice is a NUMA design. Half the memory channels are on a remote-IOD that require an extra hop for the cores in the CCD to access vs memory channels in the local-IOD. As a bonus, Intel also saves on packaging cost without having to use EMIB, freeing up advanced packaging capacity for their external foundry customers

# Codex Features and Practical Usage 🤖 Stop babysitting the terminal — non-interactive mode lets you treat Codex as just another stage in your pipe, ready to drop into CI and scripts. 🏷️ Title: `codex exec` 🔗 URL: 📘 Overview `codex exec` runs Codex once, without launching the interactive UI. You pass the prompt as a single argument, the agent does the work, and only the final message is written to stdout. It is built for CI pipelines, pre-commit hooks, and ordinary shell pipelines. ⚙️ How It Works Progress logs stream to stderr while only the final agent answer goes to stdout, so it composes cleanly with pipes and redirects. Key flags: ・`--sandbox`: `read-only` (default) / `workspace-write` (allow edits) / `danger-full-access` (full access). ・`--ask-for-approval never`: suppresses approval prompts for fully unattended runs. ・`--json`: streams every event as JSON Lines (`thread.started`, `turn.started`, `item.completed`, `turn.completed`, etc.). ・`-o/--output-last-message `: writes the final message to a file. ・`--output-schema `: enforces structured output matching a JSON Schema. ・`-C/--cd `: changes the working directory before running. ・`--skip-git-repo-check`: bypasses the Git-repo requirement (normally required to prevent destructive changes). ・`--ephemeral`: keeps session files off disk. 🛠️ Practical Usage It pairs well with stdin. For example, pipe `npm test 2>&1` into `codex exec "summarize failing tests and propose minimal fix"` and tee the result to a summary file. Structured output gives you stable, machine-readable fields: pass `--output-schema ./schema.json` with `-o ./project-metadata.json`. You can chain sessions into multi-stage pipelines: run an initial `codex exec`, then continue with `codex exec resume --last` to fix what it found. 💡 Use Cases A common split is to trigger on CI failure, generate a patch read-only, then apply it and open a PR in a separate job that holds write permissions. It also works well for log triage — pipe the tail of a log and save root-cause analysis to `analysis.md`. ⚠️ Caveats Never expose API keys as job-level env vars in workflows that check out untrusted code; on GitHub, prefer the official Codex GitHub Action. The `--full-auto` flag is deprecated — use `--sandbox workspace-write` instead. If an MCP server marked `required = true` fails to start, `codex exec` exits with an error. Always pick the least-privilege sandbox for automation. #Codex# #CI#