The usual suspects who do continuous propaganda for China, Pak, Turkey and GLISCO network are now taking up the issue and spreading hate against Indians, Hindus, and attacking Modi using the BAPS issue. So I think the BAPS controversy has more to it than meets the eye. First we need to find out if BAPS really made a request to remove female staff or not? If so who from BAPS made this request? And who from SETE asked all the female staff in the tower to leave? What's their name? Why did they do that against policy even if they were requested by BAPS? BAPS must come on TV and clarify clearly. And make sure no doubts persist about if they made a clear request to keep female staff away at the tower or not? They must also invite all women to come visit their temple in Paris. Organize events for women and destroy a certain narrative. It is so easy to turn this propaganda upside down and make it positive if they are good at comms and strategy. And can react quickly.

Scientists figured out how to strip away the 'sugar shield' that protects cancer cells from immune attacks. Cancer cells are notorious masters of disguise, often coating themselves in a thick layer of sugar-derived molecules known as glycans to remain invisible to the body's natural defenses. This sugary camouflage acts as a physical shield and a molecular 'off switch,' suppressing immune cells and rendering many modern immunotherapies, like checkpoint inhibitors, ineffective. However, researchers from MIT and Stanford University have engineered a breakthrough therapeutic class called 'AbLecs' (antibody-lectin chimeras) specifically designed to strip away this protective barrier and expose hidden tumors. Developed by MIT's Dr. Jessica Stark and Stanford Nobel laureate Dr. Carolyn Bertozzi, AbLecs work by anchoring a glycan-binding lectin protein directly to cancer cells using a tumor-targeting antibody. This molecular pairing prevents the cancer’s sugars from shutting down neighboring immune cells, giving macrophages and natural killer cells the green light to attack. In pre-clinical trials, this plug-and-play platform dramatically reduced lung metastases and outperformed existing antibody drugs, paving the way for adaptable, next-generation immunotherapies that could soon help the estimated 80% of cancer patients who do not respond to current treatments. source: Stark, J. C., & Bertozzi, C. R. (2025). Antibody-lectin chimeras for glyco-immune checkpoint blockade. Nature Biotechnology.

Interesting report by Anthropic which offers Claude AI: Chinese AI companies (seven of them) were routing prompts from users to Claude and relaying back the responses while recording the interaction to train their own models (called distillation). They found the prompts were coming from not just regular Chinese customers, but state security linked entities were passing sensitive data, from surveillance footage in China to a hacked Russian government database. What I found interesting is, why would Anthropic publicly reveal this and alert Chinese authorities that sensitive data from China was coming in? They could have simply identified the relays that Chinese AI companies were using and given them less capable Claude models while silently siphoning more sensitive data while informing US intel. Of course, this also raises questions if Anthropic reads and analyzes all our prompts and conversations. Its public face of providing great privacy and being all American may be a facade. IMO, all AI companies in the US seem infiltrated to an extent by China using their plants, compromised management, and ideologically brainwashed employees. And, I think, these infiltrates are going to be used to stall AI development in the US soon, with strikes, protests, sabotages from the inside, as the gap between US and China widens in AI. Also, American public who are already being psyop'ed against AI via SM and political pressure from the GLISCO affiliated will also be used to stall AI development in the US. Which means if OpenAI has its IPO after midterms, there's a good possibility it will not do well. And all AI companies may suddenly not do well causing the AI related market boom in the US to reverse by next year.

"We are not victims, we are victors. I will not apologize for my success. But make every kid who I govern have the opportunities to be as successful as I am." Vivek absolutely crushed the woke plants and sepoys of commies who make success and capitalism look dirty. This dangerous ideology, to look at businesses and billionaires as dirty, is being planted and spread by the GLISCO network and their ideological slaves around the world. It is being done to destroy capitalism, opportunities, and incentives for people to progress, create and innovate. It is designed to hurt countries that excel in these or trying to excel. It ultimately benefits only one country. And that's not the US, any in EU, or India.

Honor Elizabeth Wainio: Four and a Half Minutes That Changed History At 9:53 on the morning of September 11, 2001, a 27-year-old woman named Honor Elizabeth Wainio borrowed a fellow passenger's phone and made a call she never imagined she would have to make. She was aboard United Airlines Flight 93. The aircraft had been hijacked less than an hour earlier. Four terrorists had seized control of the cockpit. The pilots were either dead or incapacitated. Honor—known to family and friends as "Lizz"—understood the terrible reality unfolding around her. She called her stepmother, Esther Heymann, in Baltimore. She had only four and a half minutes. And she used every second to tell the people she loved that she cared about them. Just days before, Honor had been enjoying a trip across Europe. She had attended a friend's wedding in Florence, wandered the streets of Paris, shared meals with friends, and visited a church where she lit a candle in memory of her grandmother. She once told her mother that seeing Paris was one of her dreams. Now, sitting aboard a hijacked plane, she faced a future that had suddenly disappeared. Yet those who heard her final call remembered something remarkable. She remained calm. No panic. No hysteria. No anger. Only love. By the time Honor made her call, passengers had already learned about the attacks on the World Trade Center. They knew two planes had struck New York. They knew another had hit the Pentagon. They realized Flight 93 was not being hijacked for ransom. It was being used as a weapon. During her conversation, Honor comforted her family and reassured those she loved. Even in what she believed were her final moments, her thoughts were focused on others rather than herself. Then, shortly before the call ended, events inside the cabin began to change. Passengers had decided they would not sit and wait. They were preparing to fight back. At 9:58 a.m., Honor spoke the final words her stepmother would ever hear: "I have to go. They're breaking into the cockpit. I love you." The line disconnected. What happened next became one of the most extraordinary acts of courage in American history. The passengers and crew of Flight 93 had spent the previous minutes gathering information through phone calls. They learned about the attacks already underway and understood the likely fate awaiting them if they did nothing. So they chose action. Thomas Burnett Jr. called his wife multiple times. Jeremy Glick spoke with his wife and described passengers discussing their options and taking a vote. Flight attendant Sandra Bradshaw told her husband she was heating water to use against the hijackers. Todd Beamer prayed with a phone operator before delivering the words that would echo across the nation: "Let's roll." Ordinary people, facing impossible circumstances, made an extraordinary decision. They would fight. At 10:03 a.m., Flight 93 crashed into a field near Shanksville, Pennsylvania. Everyone on board lost their lives. But the hijackers never reached their intended target. Many historians believe the passengers' actions prevented an attack on either the U.S. Capitol or the White House, potentially saving hundreds or even thousands of lives. Honor Elizabeth Wainio was born in Baltimore and raised in Catonsville, Maryland. She graduated from Catonsville High School before earning a communications degree from Towson University. She built a successful career with Discovery Channel Stores, rising from sales positions into management through hard work and determination. Friends remembered her as energetic, optimistic, and deeply loyal. Her family described her as someone who embraced life with enthusiasm and joy. She loved the Baltimore Orioles. She loved her friends. She loved her family. At just 27 years old, she had an entire future ahead of her. In the years following the attacks, Honor's legacy continued. The Flight 93 National Memorial was established near the crash site in Shanksville, creating a place where visitors could remember the passengers and crew who sacrificed everything. A Wall of Faces displays photographs of each person aboard the flight, preserving their memories for future generations. In 2014, the passengers and crew of Flight 93 were awarded the Congressional Gold Medal, one of the nation's highest civilian honors. The medal carries a powerful inscription: "A common field one day. A field of honor forever." Towson University also created the Honor Elizabeth Wainio Memorial Communications Scholarship, helping students pursue the same educational path she once followed. Her father, Ben Wainio, has often expressed a simple hope—that people remember who his daughter was and understand that her life, and her sacrifice, mattered. Because Honor's story is not simply about tragedy. It is about courage. The quiet kind of courage. The kind that stays calm when fear would be understandable. The kind that spends final moments comforting loved ones. The kind that chooses action when the stakes could not be higher. September 11, 2001, remains one of the darkest days in American history. Nearly 3,000 people were killed. The Twin Towers collapsed. The Pentagon was struck. Four commercial airliners were hijacked. Yet amid that darkness, the passengers and crew of Flight 93 showed the world something powerful. Faced with overwhelming odds, they refused to surrender. They called their families. They said their prayers. They told the people they loved goodbye. Then they fought back. Honor Elizabeth Wainio never reached San Francisco. She never celebrated her 28th birthday. She never returned home to share stories from Europe or enjoy another meal with her family. But her courage—and the courage of every passenger and crew member aboard Flight 93—ensured that their final moments would be remembered not for fear, but for heroism. A borrowed phone. Four and a half minutes. A final expression of love. And a legacy that endures more than two decades later. Honor Elizabeth Wainio. Daughter. Sister. Friend. Professional. Dreamer. And forever, a hero. We will never forget.

Berkshire Hathaway underperformed the S&P 500 by more than 30-percentage points over the last year! Berkshire's only annual performance that was worse was in 1999 -- during the Internet mania. Today, though, Berkshire owns Apple and Google, unlike in 1999 when it didn't own any tech stocks. So, what else could explain the company's declining performance? More than a decade ago, researchers at AQR ran a series of regression studies across 30 years of Berkshire's public stock investments to discover which factors drove Buffett's outstanding investment results. They discovered -- to no one's surprise -- that Buffett buys ultra-high quality, large-cap, low-volatility stocks that are extremely cheap. But that's not all they discovered. They also disaggregated Buffett’s portfolio into two distinct sleeves and then ran the same the regression studies on each separately. The public sleeve is the portfolio of publicly traded stocks held inside Berkshire’s insurance subsidiaries — disclosed quarterly in SEC Form 13F filings. This is what most financial press coverage focuses on. The Coca-Cola, the American Express, the Apple, the Bank of America. Over the full sample it averaged about 35% of Berkshire’s total capital. The private sleeve is the portfolio of wholly-owned operating businesses — See’s Candies, Nebraska Furniture Mart, GEICO after the 1995 full acquisition, BNSF after 2010, Berkshire Hathaway Energy, Dairy Queen, NetJets, Precision Castparts, the whole roster of consolidated subsidiaries. Over the full sample the private portion grew from under 20% of Berkshire to more than 78% today. Berkshire was once an insurance company with an equity portfolio. Today it’s an insurance company owned by a conglomerate. And here's why that matters. The public sleeve — the portfolio of stocks Buffett bought fractionally and held — earned an average excess return of 12.0% per year at 16.2% volatility. Sharpe ratio: 0.74. The private sleeve — the portfolio of whole companies Buffett bought outright — earned an average excess return of 9.3% per year at 20.6% volatility. Sharpe ratio: 0.45. The publicly traded pieces of companies Buffett owned delivered materially better returns, especially when compared against the risk taken. The private sleeve’s Sharpe ratio of 0.45 is, remarkably, lower (worse) than the broad market’s 0.49 over the same period. In other words, when Buffett bought pieces of great public companies, he outperformed. When Buffett bought whole private companies, he did not. The private sleeve’s drag on Berkshire’s overall performance is meaningful. That drag was smaller in the early years, when the private portfolio was only 20% of the business. As the private sleeve has grown to 78% of Berkshire’s capital, the drag has grown proportionally. The declining Sharpe ratio of Berkshire over time — which every long-term shareholder has felt, even if they could not name it — comes primarily from the growing share of capital trapped inside whole-company acquisitions that underperform the public-market alternatives Buffett could have bought instead. Learn more about Warren's Mistakes and how to learn these lessons to improve your own investing in my new book.