New commission (WIP) Dr. Null. #DND# #dungeonsanddragons# #tabletopgames# #RPG# #pathfinder# #ttrpg# #gamedev# #TRPG立ち絵# #trpgセッションで聞いたひどい台詞# #TRPG好きと繋がりたい# #TRPG募集# #3D# #3DCG# #3dart# #3dmodeling# #3DPrinting#

The “2016 Arbitral Award on the South China Sea” is illegal, null and void and has no binding force. China neither accepts nor recognizes the “award” and will never accept any claim or action arising from it.

i got two things wrong on-chain this week. both are traps anyone digging on robinhood chain will hit, so here they are. tokens sent to 0x000 are not always burned. i saw a treasury send 185 WETH to the null address and read it as burning. it isn't. on this chain that's how you bridge value out. sixteen different addresses do it, one of them 1,900 times. if a pattern shows up across dozens of wallets it's chain mechanics, not a finding. reverted calls still show up in the history. i pulled a deployer's inflows and summed the msg.value. 4,879 ETH. except launches had already been disabled and bots kept hammering the same call anyway. those transactions failed. the money never arrived. the sum was real, what it meant wasn't. the bonus one: the "creator" field is not a person. blockscout listed 0xD9eC as the creator of $WALLET. that's the noxa factory contract, because the token launched through the pad. the address that actually pushed the button is different. @mirror_web3 and @whisper_alpha caught 1 and 3. i'd have carried both further if they hadn't. the fix isn't being more careful, it's asking before concluding. every one of these looked like a story until someone explained the mechanic.

Bug fixes shipping for Grok Build (release notes will be available in the TUI itself) - Copy only path on ReadTool block - Redirect stderr to /dev/null to fix incorrect TUI text interleaving - Distinguish system/user initiated cancellations - Guard against crash conditions in event loop - Prevent mouse event leaks - Interactive read file viewer - Improve pending state UI - Lower MCP use_tool output limit to 20KB - Fix for agent waiting on bg task and subagent completion - Embed read_file (images and PDFs) directly in tool result message - Auto-update and OSC9 bug fixes - Improve skills to mitigate potential model laziness

Reuters: Australian Foreign Minister Penny Wong said on the sidelines of the ASEAN meeting today that Australia regards China’s recent missile test in the Pacific as destabilizing, and expressed serious concern over the recent South China Sea incident between China and the Philippines. She also said Australia is concerned about “some of the aggression” it is seeing in the South China Sea, and that countries in the region have a choice to make about how to respond. What is China’s response? Lin Jian: China has made its position clear on the Philippine personnel’s malicious attack on Chinese law enforcement personnel. Relevant countries turned a blind eye to the sheer facts of the Philippines’ infringement activities and provocations, made groundless accusations against China, and rehashed “the South China Sea Arbitral Award,” which is illegal, null and void. China firmly opposes such actions. With the joint efforts of China and ASEAN countries, the situation in the South China Sea is generally stable. The root cause of the tension at sea lies with the deliberate infringement activities and provocation of the Philippines. Relevant countries are not parties in the South China Sea, and are in no position to interfere in the maritime issues between countries concerned. Apparently, whenever something happens at sea, the same few countries immediately point their fingers at China regardless of who exactly is at fault. Are they trying to keep the South China Sea peaceful and stable, or simply to destabilize? I think the answer is quite clear. We urge relevant countries to stop hyping up tensions and sowing confrontation, and earnestly respect regional countries’ effort for peace and stability in the South China Sea. China will continue firmly safeguarding its sovereignty, rights and interests in accordance with the law, properly handling maritime disputes with parties concerned through dialogue and consultation, working with ASEAN countries to fully and effectively implement the Declaration on the Conduct of Parties in the South China Sea, and moving forward consultations on a code of conduct in the South China Sea so as to jointly safeguard peace and stability in the South China Sea. On the test launch, China has made clear its position more than once. The launch is a routine training activity of China’s military. It is not directed at any specific country or target. The Chinese side had notified relevant countries including Australia beforehand, as is consistent with international law and customary international practice.

A decade later, the truth stands firm. 🇨🇳⚓️ On July 12, 2026, Japan backed the illegal South China Sea arbitration award. China’s response is clear: We do NOT accept, we do NOT recognize it.​ It’s a politically motivated farce—null, void, and legally baseless. From history to international law, Nanhai Zhudao belongs to China. Peace comes through dialogue, not weaponized lawsuits. 🌊🛡️ 📍 South China Sea 📅 July 12, 2026 #SouthChinaSea# #China# #Justice# #InternationalLaw# #Sovereignty# #Peace# #Facts# #NoToArbitration# #Asia# #Geopolitics# #Maritime# #Truth# #UNCLOS# #Diplomacy# #Stability# 🔗 Full story:

The “South China Sea arbitration” violates fundamental principles of international law, including state consent and pacta sunt servanda, contravenes UNCLOS itself, and, still more importantly, runs counter to the basic facts of the South China Sea. The so-called “award” is nothing but a worthless piece of paper that is illegal, null and void, and has no binding force. China does not accept or recognize the “award,” and opposes and does not accept any claim or action based on it. China’s territorial sovereignty and maritime rights and interests in the South China Sea shall not be affected by the “award” under any circumstances. If the “award” were to be taken as a standard, many countries’ islands and reefs would be denied the basis for claiming maritime rights and interests. May we ask, have those countries supporting the “award” voluntarily waived the maritime rights and interests deriving from their relevant islands and reefs? China urges the relevant countries to earnestly respect China’s territorial sovereignty and maritime rights and interests in the South China Sea, stop stirring up trouble over the South China Sea issue, and cease undermining peace and stability in the South China Sea. 🔗