I’ve been holding $ZAMM since last year. Never sold. Then I checked the TAC airdrop. Not eligible. At first I thought maybe I missed something. But the more I looked into it, the less it made sense. If ZORG is basically staked ZAMM — if it represents ZAMM that has been deposited into the DAO — then why were long-term ZAMM holders not included in the snapshot? That’s the part I can’t accept. I didn’t buy late. I didn’t farm and dump. I didn’t rotate in after the hype. I held ZAMM the whole time. But now the answer is: you didn’t stake it into ZORG, so you don’t count. Then what exactly was ZAMM supposed to represent? If ZORG = staked ZAMM, why does the snapshot recognize ZORG but ignore the original ZAMM holders? If the goal was to reward the real early supporters, shouldn’t ZAMM holders have been included by default? The way this played out makes it feel like the old pool provided liquidity, while the new entry point captured all the rights. If you didn’t follow the exact path later designed by the team, you could hold from last year until now and still be left out. That’s not just “missing the rules.” That’s realizing after months of holding that your position was not recognized when it actually mattered. ZAMM → ZORG → TACIT looks clean from the outside. But for long-term ZAMM holders who never staked, it feels very different. You say $ZORG is staked $ZAMM. Then why was my ZAMM, held for this long, not in the snapshot? That is the real issue. So when people say the pool got drained, I’m not surprised. In DeFi, liquidity providers often look like early supporters, but in the end they become exit liquidity. They take the volatility, the impermanent loss, the opportunity cost, and the waiting. Then a new narrative comes along, and the rights move somewhere else. I’m done participating in these kinds of activities. Not because I missed an airdrop and got emotional. Because this kind of structure makes the whole thing feel pointless. Old users can accept risk. What we can’t accept is holding through everything, only to find out later that the rules were never really on our side.

I’ve been holding $ZAMM since last year. Never sold. Then I checked the TAC airdrop. Not eligible. At first I thought maybe I missed something. But the more I looked into it, the less it made sense. If ZORG is basically staked ZAMM — if it represents ZAMM that has been deposited into the DAO — then why were long-term ZAMM holders not included in the snapshot? That’s the part I can’t accept. I didn’t buy late. I didn’t farm and dump. I didn’t rotate in after the hype. I held ZAMM the whole time. But now the answer is: you didn’t stake it into ZORG, so you don’t count. Then what exactly was ZAMM supposed to represent? If ZORG = staked ZAMM, why does the snapshot recognize ZORG but ignore the original ZAMM holders? If the goal was to reward the real early supporters, shouldn’t ZAMM holders have been included by default? The way this played out makes it feel like the old pool provided liquidity, while the new entry point captured all the rights. If you didn’t follow the exact path later designed by the team, you could hold from last year until now and still be left out. That’s not just “missing the rules.” That’s realizing after months of holding that your position was not recognized when it actually mattered. ZAMM → ZORG → TACIT looks clean from the outside. But for long-term ZAMM holders who never staked, it feels very different. You say $ZORG is staked $ZAMM. Then why was my ZAMM, held for this long, not in the snapshot? That is the real issue. So when people say the pool got drained, I’m not surprised. In DeFi, liquidity providers often look like early supporters, but in the end they become exit liquidity. They take the volatility, the impermanent loss, the opportunity cost, and the waiting. Then a new narrative comes along, and the rights move somewhere else. I’m done participating in these kinds of activities. Not because I missed an airdrop and got emotional. Because this kind of structure makes the whole thing feel pointless. Old users can accept risk. What we can’t accept is holding through everything, only to find out later that the rules were never really on our side.