BNB Chain Developers(@BNBChainDevs):Why did the report evaluate ML-DSA-44 specifically? The biggest reason is practicality. Compared to higher-security parameter sets like ML-DSA-65 and ML-DSA-87, ML-DSA-44 offers: • Smaller signatures • Faster verification • Lower network overhead That matters because signature size quickly becomes the dominant scaling constraint in post-quantum systems. In testing, PQ blocks were already ~18× larger than non-PQ blocks at equivalent TPS. Read the report 👇

BNB Chain Developers

@BNBChainDevs

Supporting developers on @BNBCHAIN. Start building via the link in our bio 👇

Joined September 2022

773 Following 44.6K Followers

BNB Chain Developers@BNBChainDevs

2026.05.17 18:00

Why did the report evaluate ML-DSA-44 specifically? The biggest reason is practicality. Compared to higher-security parameter sets like ML-DSA-65 and ML-DSA-87, ML-DSA-44 offers: • Smaller signatures • Faster verification • Lower network overhead That matters because signature size quickly becomes the dominant scaling constraint in post-quantum systems. In testing, PQ blocks were already ~18× larger than non-PQ blocks at equivalent TPS. Read the report 👇