Colby(@ColbySaysHi):This, 1000x times this. The whole point is its onchain permissionless ownership of an asset type which previously required a centralized asset issuer (the stocker of tcg cards or in a casino's case, the provider of liquidity and bankroll to survive randomness and profit from edge). Yes its gambling, but its gambling anyone can own both sides of the stack on.

2026.07.25 21:45

This, 1000x times this. The whole point is its onchain permissionless ownership of an asset type which previously required a centralized asset issuer (the stocker of tcg cards or in a casino's case, the provider of liquidity and bankroll to survive randomness and profit from edge). Yes its gambling, but its gambling anyone can own both sides of the stack on.

DGMD.6529@DGMD22

2026.07.25 21:37

Yea man, pack ripping TCG gacha, that is one of the most popular trends in collectibles is +ev for the pack ripper right? People completely missing the forest in the trees. All gachas are -ev for the spinner by design, they have to be. The novel part about FWA is that you can be the house, the ripper, or both. This experience does not exist anywhere else. It’s programmable, transparent and verifiable. And this is definitely not the final version.