Register and share your invite link to earn from video plays and referrals.

James Muninn
@Muninn
I share deep dives on traders and strategies
201 Following    18.2K Followers
Moving your stop to breakeven when you're up 3-4R is indifferent. 1,625 of 6,150 breakouts got to +3R. Moving the stop to entry saved 354 that came back (+349R), and stopped out 136 that would have done better (-425R). Same story at +4R. So.. its a breakeven decision.
Show more
If your trade is up 3 to 4R and you still haven't moved your stop to b/e, you almost deserve to watch it come all the way back and stop you out. That's like winning the lottery, refusing to cash the ticket, and then complaining when you lose it.
Show more
Qullamaggie said with a small account he would not trade the way he trades now. His reasoning from two 2021 streams:
Not chasing the opening print is generally very good advice 83% of Qullamaggie's breakout buys from 9:30 to 9:34 got stopped out. But.. the biggest winner of all was bought at 9:32. Trading is hard af. Glad we have traders like @RealSimpleAriel laying out the law and giving earnest advice
Show more
If you want to play a possible bounce tomorrow. - You wait for the morning profit taking - Let the market set an intraday low from the gap up - Play the reclaim of VWAP - Size properly - Set stop at LOD DEFINITELY do not chase the opening print. Even if that works tomorrow; it has NOT been working for a few weeks. and buying into supply below the 200sma is almost always fools gold. Just look at todays action.
Show more
A tight stop isn't always best. Qullamaggie's tightest stops got taken out 81% of the time. His widest, 64%. One of the questions traders ask most is where the stop should go. I split his stops in terms of how wide they were.. Tightest third: a median 1.3% below, 17% winners. Widest third: 4.8% below, 28% winners. It's all connected and we can't have our cake and eat it too
Show more
Big fan of @Wordsofrizdom , but weekly alignment doesn't help breakouts. On 6,150 trades, skipping the ones where the weekly didn’t line up gave up 38% of the total R. Qullamaggie bought 44% of his breakouts with the weekly not trending up.
Show more
Since 2022 I've sat down with hundreds of traders on Words of Rizdom. The idea that changed my own trading most wasn't a strategy. It was time frame alignment. Check the higher timeframe trend first. Only drop to a lower timeframe when it agrees. If they don't line up, there's no trade. People keep searching for a holy grail setup. This one rule did more for me than any setup ever did.
Show more
The Martingale of trading: 10 losers in a row? Double your size! The length of subsequent losers far exceeds most new traders imagination. Qullamaggie did 31 losers in a row! But, someone - dont recall who, please ping me - in a previous post said something to the effect of "What if numbers of losers in a row is the real breadth indiciator?" So I tested it: Qullamaggie's breakouts bought while his last 10 closed trades were all losers won 33% of the time. All the others: 22%.
Show more
Selling on the 2nd consecutive close below 20-day SMA isn't better. @RossHaber is not a pure momentum trader. He's more of a purist CANSLIM trader, trading the most liquid leaders. I have a lot of respect for him, and he's surely one of the best in the business. In his blog he argues for using the 2nd close below the 20day, because "One close below is noise. Two is a change in the medium-term trend." I tested this on a dataset of more than 3,000 breakouts from low six figure to high 8-figure traders, 2019 - 2026. I don't think it fits Ross's trades directly, but there's definitely some overlap in the dataset. The extra day came out behind on 1,269 breakouts and ahead on 653. It did not add anything meaningfully in terms of raw profits. It did however extend the holdning period significantly. So is Ross wrong here? Probably not, as he trades a different basket of stocks than what his rule is tested on.. But, the main point here is that it's not only raw profits per trade that matters when evaluating our entry and exit rules.. if we lock up our buying power just to eek out a few more %-points, we could miss out on some of the best trades..
Show more
Check out my latest blog on why I sell on the second consecutive close below the 21-day SMA.
‼️WEEKEND STUDY SESSION: how many days until we know we have a winner? WHY "Some of the best setups either go right away, they go straight up.. but sometimes they don't. Sometimes they come down and are very close to stop you out. And sometimes they stop you out and then go." 299 of his 828 breakout entries hit the stop on entry day. 440 on the second day. The 245 that were still open after day 5 add up to +1,555R on the 10-day exit. Everything that closed before adds up to -562R. So the losers are cut fast, and the profits are in the rest. What we don't have is the win-rate post ante, day by day. I know our overall winrate, but I've never checked the winrate on day 2, 3, 4 or 5. THE WORK (2 to 3 hours) 1. Open 30 breakout entries in date order. 2. On each chart, look at the entry candle only. Write down two things: did his stop hold through the day, and where it closed against his entry, in R 3. Move to the close of day 3. Same two things. Then day 5. 4. Then find the exit. 5. Count. Of the trades still open after day 1, how many ended green? Same for day 3 and day 5. Then the second count: on day 1, could the ones that ended big be told from the rest by where they closed? WHAT I'M AFTER Four win rates: one at the buy, after day 1, after day 3, after day 5. I have the first one. If the other three move the way I think they do, it changes how I sit through day 2. I have borrowed stil concept from someone who trades intraday with great success, who doubled his avg. gain in a setup because he cut his losers faster.
Show more
Wish I had this feature when I started trading. Would've saved me so much time. Being able to share the answers from the Qullamaggie trained AI is such a time saver..
Don't buy breakouts when T2108 < 30 (%-stocks over 40-day SMA) Win-rate is about the same, but winners are about half size. @TMLitalia told me T2108 sorted his trades better than my hot-days split So I ran it on 6,151 breakouts from low six figure to high eight figure traders.
Show more
Breakouts during the hot markets has about the same win-rate as other periods. But the winners are much bigger. @NickSchmidt says "Opportunities come in windows", and when "everyone is making money" he makes sure to press aggressively.. Checked the results for Qullamaggies trades in the hottest periods of 2019 to 2022.. Win rate: 23% vs 27% Avg. winner: 0.76R vs 2.26R
Show more
Thank you! 🫡🙏 Been getting a lot of feedback like these lately.. been pushing new features everyday and aiming for a big update before Black Friday Happy to share value and super fun that ppl find it insanely valuable!
Show more
@Muninn Was this made by you? I think you posted it the other day and I just wanted to say its insanely valuable.
Always study. Always look for edge. @jfsrev has so many brilliant ideas and adaptions. It's not only about bagging those big winners, but also about cutting our losses (smaller). Jeff says that "If your win rate is below 40%, your top priority should be reducing your losses further." I tested it on Qullamaggie's breakout trades. It reduces the drawdown by almost a third, but gives up some profits..
Show more
Appreciate the kind words and subscribing to our community. I’m making this reply public as the 3-stop strategy within T+3 has now been adopted by quite a number of traders — it’s only fair that everyone understands my statement: “If your win rate is below 40%, your top priority should be reducing your losses further.” Performance can be enhanced from loss management if bulk of your trades are slated to be losses, a reality that most of us need to accept as traders to our system as a business cost. In the display below, I show two different stop-loss applications and their resulting drawdowns, based on a 28% win rate over a 500-trade sample size. The time range of these trades depends on your own strategy — intraday traders, for instance, can easily accumulate 500 trades in under 3 months. The real value of the 3-stop strategy doesn’t appear in just a handful of trades. It’s a long-term discipline that requires consistency and repetition to gradually reduce your drawdown, as shown here.
Show more
Can we get the 🐐 to ask for the same again? In october 2021 he got a full month of money printing..
Can we get a few months of easy money environment? Stream is now LIVE!
Don't buy breakouts when T2108 < 30 (%-stocks over 40-day SMA) Win-rate is about the same, but winners are about half size. @TMLitalia told me T2108 sorted his trades better than my hot-days split So I ran it on 6,151 breakouts from low six figure to high eight figure traders.
Show more
Breakouts during the hot markets has about the same win-rate as other periods. But the winners are much bigger. @NickSchmidt says "Opportunities come in windows", and when "everyone is making money" he makes sure to press aggressively.. Checked the results for Qullamaggies trades in the hottest periods of 2019 to 2022.. Win rate: 23% vs 27% Avg. winner: 0.76R vs 2.26R
Show more
"The best trades will be yelling at us" But @Qullamaggie tried to short Wayfair 10 times.. Before he finally bought it and made $600,000 in a month.. Follow his play-by-play trade breakdown 👇
Show more
Don’t read this article. The real market breadth indicator is a surge in: - Meme volume - Off-topic chatter - Options strategies Check your favorite trading Discord.
Market breadth: what actually works. I tested 45 rules against 1,500 logged breakout trades. the Stockbee Market Monitor, new highs vs new lows, $MMTW, McClellan, % above the 20-day. Which ones help, when they help, and when to ignore all of it.
Show more
Highly recommend to read @ShakePryzby1 post about making adjustments.. Qullamaggie once said that the real edge, and challenge, lies in being able to adapt Out of curiousity I also checked how Shake's adjustment would effect Qullamaggies trades in raging bull market. 76 of the 255 breakouts that traded at +4R still ended at or below the buy price using the 10 day SMA exit.. Selling half at 4R and trailing the rest turned all 76 into winners. The average trade still dropped from about +1.20R to +0.93R.
Show more
Making Adjustments: "The fact is this market is a Trader's Dream and a Swing Trader's Nightmare." Recognition of the underlying environment is the utmost important aspect in trade management for me. I spent Friday and most of the weekend maniacally going over all of my trades in the chop. What I was consistently finding was my entries were giving me traction - but I was constantly giving 4-5R winners back breakeven. The major adjustment has to be quickly trimming winners and not caring if they go higher without me, because the data is showing me that more often than not, they are coming right back at me. "Sometimes I am taking advantage of the volatility in buying shakeouts, sometimes I am getting taken advantage of in holding too much size for a swing." OK - I need to keep focusing on buying shakeouts, but I need to scale out of these things when they begin to look pretty. Came into the day looking to buy the semi puke - not for a days long swing trade - but to manipulate an inefficiency the market is offering. If you noticed last night into this morning on this app, the crowd couldn't have been more pessimistic. This is when you buy in this market. Sell when they're excited again. $SMH closed way overbought above its 5ema at $632.50 just 5 sessions ago. Coming into the day, it is opening below it's 50 day at $578. If I am short semi's, I am looking to completely cover that trade into this morning's weakness. This lead me to have conviction in a semi long. So instead of SMH I wanted to buy the best semi coming into a support level which was $AMD, which was retesting its prior all time high that it had not tested since it broke out. So when AMD began flushing off the open I was buying small feelers trying to find a bottom, looking to really load up when it reclaimed intraday VWAP then give confirmation add through new intraday highs, which is exactly how it played out. Now in most of my recent trades I was going up 4-5R and giving it right back. So my goal in this trade is not to execute a perfect swing trade, I don't think semi's look healthy in the slightest going forward -- but to simply take advantage of a market inefficiency. So I began trimming 4R into prior day lows which was the first resistance. My target for the trade was only 595 into the overhead 20ema which may begin to act as resistance if semi's give up the bounce. I don't want to be apart of that trade, I want to be in and out, make my money on the opening bounce back. Get those first trims off, move my stop to breakeven, winning trade on our hands. From there Q's nearly fill the gap in the first 45 minutes. This is my cue to begin thinking about exiting stage left. My goal in this trade is not some big market bottom swing trade, it's simply to buy an oversold bounce and sell it into strength. So when that broad market selling begins, I completely sell my AMD into strength 592ish and lock in a ~4.5R winner. Surely not retiring off this one, but I wasn't putting myself in a position to give it back either! This stock is higher without me, I don't care in the slightest because my goal of the trade was to just buy the oversold bounce, sell into strength, book some PnL, positively reinforce the adjustments I'm making, and leave the session with my head held high. Maybe in the next efforts I only sell 2/3 and just keep a breakeven stop and let the rest run. But in real time I didn't have the conviction this and the Q's would actually continue higher seeing rates get bought up along with oil ticking higher. That is something I will determine in review. For now, content with the adjustments in taking advantage of the shakeouts, trimming into strength better than I had been, and overall executing the choppy market playbook in a great opportunity with size. All of your answers are sitting right there for you in your trade review. 🫡
Show more
"The best trades will be yelling at us" But @Qullamaggie tried to short Wayfair 10 times.. Before he finally bought it and made $600,000 in a month.. Follow his play-by-play trade breakdown 👇
Show more
A strategy where 4 trades carries most of your profits.. is it a good strategy?
5% of Qullamaggie's breakouts carried 100% of the profits.. @CFlanders7 says that "the top 10 trades made my entire year …" @stamatoudism says that "You need 10-15 good/outlier trades to have a great year" @SRxTrades says that "My top 5 trades make up for more than 50% of my YTD profits" So, where is the edge? In hitting our stops, or finding those outliers..?
Show more
Breakouts during the hot markets has about the same win-rate as other periods. But the winners are much bigger. @NickSchmidt says "Opportunities come in windows", and when "everyone is making money" he makes sure to press aggressively.. Checked the results for Qullamaggies trades in the hottest periods of 2019 to 2022.. Win rate: 23% vs 27% Avg. winner: 0.76R vs 2.26R
Show more