Lots of controversy on this EIP today. The issue is this change may not effectively lead to the intended objectives (at least the community's not convinced), while the second-order effects are not addressed or discussed sufficiently. Some concerns which i see are emerging in community discussions: - Would lower staking rewards push solo stakers out first, while large institutional operators remain viable through MEV revenue, execution-layer income and economies of scale, potentially increasing validator concentration? - How would lower issuance affect the yields and DeFi pricing of LSTs such as stETH and weETH, including their use in lending, yield products and restaking markets? - Is there sufficient empirical justification for the proposed 50% staking threshold and the linear burn curve, particularly as ETH ETFs, institutional staking and onchain credit markets continue to develop? I personally don't think this will effectively protect solo stakers, nor will it really reduce inflation that much. Ethereum has developed into a complex economy, and the potential second order effects may far outweigh the realistic achievement of intended objectives.