ilemi(@andrewhong5297 ):“Closed sourced is safer” I wonder if hackers found this due to decoding error messages in bytecode, would be an interesting way to scan for contracts that may have certain types of vulnerabilities from poorly set up modifiers

2026.05.07 18:33

“Closed sourced is safer” I wonder if hackers found this due to decoding error messages in bytecode, would be an interesting way to scan for contracts that may have certain types of vulnerabilities from poorly set up modifiers

Blockaid@blockaid_

2026.05.07 01:26

🚨 Blockaid's exploit detection system has identified an on-going exploit on TrustedVolumes (1inch market maker / resolver, @trustedvolumes ). Chain: Ethereum Victim contract: TrustedVolumes resolver — 0x9bA0CF1588E1DFA905eC948F7FE5104dD40EDa31 Exploiter: 0xC3EBDdEa4f69df717a8f5c89e7cF20C1c0389100 Exploit tx: 0xc5c61b3ac39d854773b9dc34bd0cdbc8b5bbf75f18551802a0b5881fcb990513 Total extracted so far: ~$5.87M (1,291.16 WETH + 206,282 USDT + 16.939 WBTC + 1,268,771 USDC). Same operator as the March-2025 1inch Fusion V1 incident; this is a different vulnerability, in a TrustedVolumes-controlled custom RFQ swap proxy (0xeEeEEe53033F7227d488ae83a27Bc9A9D5051756). More details will follow.