Over the last 24 hours, @1inch has been flooded with misleading posts all stemming from one clickbait mention. With a basic understanding of the TrustedVolumes exploit and how 1inch is architected, most of this confusion could have been avoided. Our architecture makes it technically impossible for a TrustedVolumes vulnerability to affect 1inch users. Atomic swaps do not share custodial infrastructure. There is nothing to bridge across. But what matters here goes beyond one correction. Information moves fast in this industry. Someone reads a post-mortem in passing, reposts it with their own framing, and within hours thousands of people have formed an opinion — including users who are still deciding whether this space is safe to participate in. Established protocols like 1inch can usually absorb that kind of misinformation. Smaller or newer projects often cannot. Before attaching a project to an exploit, understand the architecture behind it. If you're unsure, ask. The consequences of getting it wrong fall on teams and communities that had nothing to do with the incident. We need both speed and accuracy. DeFi projects face enough threats right now, without needing to fear fake ones.