登録して招待リンクを共有すると、動画再生報酬と紹介報酬を獲得できます。

Simon Dixon
@SimonDixonTwitt
Left Investment Bank 2006. Launched BankToTheFuture 2010. Spoke at 1st Bitcoin conference & published 1st #Bitcoin# book 2011. Angel Investor 100+ #BTC# Companies
参加 August 2009
636 フォロー中    279.9K ファン
This is what it looks like when FIC negotiates regional stability while MIC extracts what it can as the forever war winds down But the devil is in the detail PACT is only a proposal No money appears to have been committed and no shareholders governance rights or investment terms have been disclosed The US Development Finance Corporation is not privately owned It is a US government agency controlled by a board containing the secretaries of State Treasury and Commerce its presidentially appointed CEO and private sector directors Here is what I will be watching if it materialises. Is the US contribution funded through congressional appropriations Treasury borrowing DFC equity loans or guarantees? Do the eight regional partners receive ownership and voting rights proportional to their contributions? Who controls the investment committee and selects the projects? Who absorbs the first losses if Iran destroys the infrastructure again? Who owns the pipelines refineries and project companies after reconstruction? Are contracts tied to US engineering energy security and technology companies? Does DFC use public money to bring in FIC infrastructure funds banks insurers and private credit? These details determine what PACT actually is If the Gulf supplies half the capital while Washington controls allocation US companies receive the contracts and private capital captures the assets then this is not simply reconstruction It is Gulf and US public money de-risking a US-controlled FIC investment platform If the regional contributors receive proportional governance local ownership and the economic returns then it is closer to genuine sovereign co-investment War has two revenue cycles MIC profits from destroying and securing the infrastructure FIC profits from financing insuring and owning what replaces it The announcement is the headline The capital structure will tell us who really benefited and who really won the war I will keep following the money if PACT materialises If the previously reported $300bn Iran reconstruction proposal eventually materialises too, despite the public denials that will tell us even more about the truth behind the theatre and propaganda.
もっと見る
NEW: Trump administration proposed a $5 billion investment fund ("PACT") to rebuild Middle Eastern energy infrastructure damaged in the Iran war, seeking matching contributions from eight Gulf/regional partners for a $10 billion total. It's a tacit admission the seven-month conflict has wrecked regional pipelines and refineries. Gulf officials are skeptical. Rebuilding without a peace deal risks Iran targeting new infrastructure, and smaller states like Kuwait and Qatar still depend on the Strait of Hormuz regardless. The fund would be managed by the US Development Finance Corporation, an agency that normally targets developing countries, not wealthy Gulf monarchies. Source: WSJ
もっと見る