LIBERAL ON TIKTOK: Some of you need to leave. You need to leave the United States. You don't have months. Some of you might have weeks. You pretend this is not coming, but it is coming. America is about to become a Christian nationalist dictatorship. It's happening. Trump will become president. These people have lists and agendas, and enemies. Some of you are enemies. Some of you need to leave. h/t @Dialectiks

Hear me out. I think the Liberals paid for all these polls. They can't campaign on their track record, and they have an inexperienced leader, so they were just hoping for an easy win, with the fastes campaign possible. They were counting on otherwise uninformed Canadians to just just see this and not be bothered with voting. They wanted the electorate to think that their victory was a done deal. What they didn't realize is that this rallied Conservatives. That's why we're seeing huge crowds at Pierre's events. Liberals are like bullies. As soon as we push back, they'll fold. Everyone has to come out and vote. Make it too big for them to steal it.

Susan Crawford’s win cemented the Wisconsin Supreme Court’s liberal majority. The election was seen as a crucial test for the growing backlash against Donald Trump and Elon Musk’s agenda. https://t.co/XM6bZFB4a7

📢 Our September issue is OUT NOW ‼️ 📱 Special section on global populism 📑 7 Research articles on neo-liberal think tanks, socializing China and more 📊2 Policy papers on Chinese diplomacy and the new American right 📚30 Book reviews READ HERE: https://t.co/70i3aqZBDG https://t.co/3KFRTptUYN

Here is my perspective on Justice Amy Coney Barrett’s latest vote: I believe justices should interpret the law, not create new ones. However, in today’s environment, where anyone opposing liberals faces harsh criticism, a conservative judge might notice that their vote won’t ultimately alter the outcome—especially if five justices have already voted in favor. In such cases, they might choose to align with the left to appease them, preserving their credibility for a future ruling where their vote could be decisive. So, Justice Barrett may have voted against the conservatives because she knew her vote wouldn’t change the result, but it could prevent critics from targeting her voting record later. Just a thought.

🚨BREAKING: The U.S. Supreme Court overruled Judge Boasberg's block on President Trump using the Alien Enemies Act to deport criminal aliens. The decision was a 5-4 win for Trump. Amy Cony Barrett once again sided with the three liberals. https://t.co/y9exsTfEnn