Yesterday I posted my observations on the new X algorithm in a community-explainer style The post got read literally. Every claim treated as a verified technical fact That wasn't the intent, but it landed that way, and the responsibility for that is mine I deleted the post A more rigorous version is coming where I walk through the actual code line by line and show what genuinely impacts reach The previous version wasn't engagement farming or audience-misleading. It was an attempt to translate technical code into plain English The lesson: I framed observations as if they were verified mechanisms. Next post separates the two cleanly @nikitabier and the X team are doing real work on this platform The current algorithm is fair, and I'm confident it gets better from here Next post on this topic ships with the receipts