the proposal is unserious and insulting unserious because it completely twists the protective nature of the BRCA into a weapon against devs insulting because, as @patrickjwitt noted, it is not representative of the negotiations the WH and Treasury have engaged in with LEOs these groups and CCM instead chose to leak this unworkable version to the press in an attempt to hinder progress for months, we, along with @fund_defi, @coincenter, @BlockchainAssn, @SolanaInstitute, @a16zcrypto, @paradigm and other allies have educated lawmakers, including CCM, on the need for dev protections in Clarity to ensure the success of this industry, especially as it relates to the competitiveness and national security of the United States we will continue to engage, in good faith, with those willing to work with us to resolution, but we will not entertain bad faith attempts to criminalize devs who publish and contribute to non-controlling, non-custodial software