注册并分享邀请链接,可获得视频播放与邀请奖励。

DaPangDun
@dapangdun
❤️独立民科研究员,瞎研究 💚信仰BTC,BTC→个人主权 💙喜欢做看起来没价值事情的小韭菜(比如布道RGB) ☎️唯一TG群组:
352 正在关注    30.6K 粉丝
今天晚上20点 #RGB# 茶话会(第五期):本期聊聊 #CSV# ▪️什么是CSV ▪️目前的CSV方案 ▪️CSV赛道的优势 ▪️对CSV赛道的展望 有兴趣的可以一起来交流
显示更多
很多社区成员不会测试,所以我做了一个测试视频 不过声音有点小🥲 #BTC# #RGB#
RGB LIGHTNING NODE V0.04发布后,我做第一阶段测试,先将总体测试情况汇报一下: 1. 基本功能测试 (1)程序安装:✅ (2)Loacal Node 创建:✅ ▪️需要提前安装Docker ▪️在Node创建的时候运行Container (3)Regtest Faucet使用:✅ (4)On-Chain BTC转移:✅ (5)LN BTC转移:✅ (6)管理UTXO,包含创建UTXO和增加UTXO:✅ (7)Node导入RGB资产:✅ ▪️需要Bitlight钱包配合 ▪️实质看起来是RGB资产从钱包“跨到”Node (8)RGB资产Exprot到钱包:✅ ▪️需要Bitlight钱包配合 ▪️实质看起来是RGB资产从Node“跨回”钱包 ▪️目前限定Bitlight钱包,未来可以是同RGB协议版本的其他钱包 2. Channel测试 (1)Node Connect:✅ ▪️Node之间建立P2P联系 (2)Channel创建:✅ ▪️需要Node Connet作为前置 ▪️需要理解通道创建的各个参数 ▪️UI界面有待优化 (3)Channel关闭:✅ ▪️UI界面有待优化 (4)RGB资产通过Channel转移:✅ ▪️转移正常,不过只来回测试了几次,未进行数量级别转移测试 ▪️资产展示页面需要优化,目前在LN通道内的RGB资产并不能直观看到 3. 其他功能测试 (1)备份钱包:✅ (2)恢复钱包:✅ (3)Node切换:✅ ---- 整体来说: ▪️主要功能测试均通过,无异常 ▪️部分界面的UI需要优化从而让体验更好 ▪️自建Node依然具有不小的门槛,引入Remote Node才能大幅度降低普通用户的使用门槛 ▪️部分环节的逻辑(比如open channel和close channel)细节我还需要仔细研究 #BTC# #RGB#
显示更多
RGB LIGHTNING NODE V0.04发布后,我做第一阶段测试,先将总体测试情况汇报一下: 1. 基本功能测试 (1)程序安装:✅ (2)Loacal Node 创建:✅ ▪️需要提前安装Docker ▪️在Node创建的时候运行Container (3)Regtest Faucet使用:✅ (4)On-Chain BTC转移:✅ (5)LN BTC转移:✅ (6)管理UTXO,包含创建UTXO和增加UTXO:✅ (7)Node导入RGB资产:✅ ▪️需要Bitlight钱包配合 ▪️实质看起来是RGB资产从钱包“跨到”Node (8)RGB资产Exprot到钱包:✅ ▪️需要Bitlight钱包配合 ▪️实质看起来是RGB资产从Node“跨回”钱包 ▪️目前限定Bitlight钱包,未来可以是同RGB协议版本的其他钱包 2. Channel测试 (1)Node Connect:✅ ▪️Node之间建立P2P联系 (2)Channel创建:✅ ▪️需要Node Connet作为前置 ▪️需要理解通道创建的各个参数 ▪️UI界面有待优化 (3)Channel关闭:✅ ▪️UI界面有待优化 (4)RGB资产通过Channel转移:✅ ▪️转移正常,不过只来回测试了几次,未进行数量级别转移测试 ▪️资产展示页面需要优化,目前在LN通道内的RGB资产并不能直观看到 3. 其他功能测试 (1)备份钱包:✅ (2)恢复钱包:✅ (3)Node切换:✅ ---- 整体来说: ▪️主要功能测试均通过,无异常 ▪️部分界面的UI需要优化从而让体验更好 ▪️自建Node依然具有不小的门槛,引入Remote Node才能大幅度降低普通用户的使用门槛 ▪️部分环节的逻辑(比如open channel和close channel)细节我还需要仔细研究 #BTC# #RGB#
显示更多
赌球, 全世界的球都是假的! 为什么花那么多钱? 10亿人民币去买一个球员, 你以为买他去赢啊, 买他去输! 他整队球价值100个亿, 最强的球队, 他就是跟全世界的赌球的人 勾结的。 这一场球我就输, 买我赢的全死了! 就是世界杯, 初赛的时候也是假的, 一定有的! 不是每场都是, 而是以我眼看都一样。 那些国家的联赛越贵, 那些球员越是假球。 我是不赞成, 你养成一个赌的习惯的, 可是你从来没赌过, 或者你也不懂这个是赌, 恭喜你, 你以后都不要学! ----王晶
显示更多
#BTC# #RGB# 趁着这个推特,正好梳理一下最近 #RGB# 协议的发展情况。 从3月24日RGB Lightning Node 0.01发布之后,就是两条腿在走路: ▪️Lightning Node的持续更新:从v0.01到v0.02到v0.03到v0.04,不断的将Node的功能完善,使其能够尽可能快的达到公测的地步; ▪️Bitlight wallet同步做了若干次更新:内容包括节点升级、与Bitcoin core的版本同步升级、配合Node升级、修复若干社区反馈的小问题。 所以大家感觉进度是越来越快的。 在Crypto当前的市场环境下,能踏实做事的团队不多了,也是从这些进展上让我对于RGB协议发展的未来更有信心!
显示更多
Bitlight Wallet v1.3.1 Released We are pleased to announce the release of Bitlight Wallet v1.3.1, introducing key enhancements to RGB asset interoperability and browser extension performance. What's New: • RGB Asset Consignment Import/Export — Bitlight Wallet now supports importing and exporting RGB asset consignments for RGB Lightning Nodes on Regtest, shipped alongside rgb-ldk-control-panel v0.0.4. This milestone enables developers to test end-to-end RGB asset transfers across Lightning channels in a controlled environment. • Chrome Extension Optimization — The Bitlight WASM library powering the Chrome extension has been optimized and upgraded. These updates reflect our continued commitment to advancing RGB protocol infrastructure and delivering a seamless developer experience. We encourage developers building on RGB Lightning to test consignment workflows and provide feedback. Make Bitcoin Smart.
显示更多
SPHINCS- 是针对 ETH 虚拟机优化的基于哈希的后量子签名方案。 这个方案不是从零发明的,它是把 SPHINCS+(NIST SLH-DSA标准方案)与 Blockstream 在比特币场景下开发的紧凑哈希签名优化技术结合,并针对 EVM 的 gas、calldata 和 KECCAK 原生特性做了专门调优。 这个方案的优点有: ▪️无需预编译/协议变更 ▪️比标准 SPHINCS+ 更 EVM 友好 ▪️比格子基方案(ML-DSA/FN-DSA)更简单 ▪️比有状态方案(如 SHRINCS)更实用 ▪️提供了 Lean 4 + Verity 形式化证明的验证器 它也有自己的问题: ▪️目前虽然说“可用”,但是还是属于研究原型,未经密码学等专业审计 ▪️签名大小较大:典型情况下是ECDSA签名的50-100X ▪️签名时间上,如果要标准NIST对齐参数集,工作量就会极高,普通设备难以承受,做了变体(C12\C13)带来的问题是非标准构造,会打破完整的FIPS合规 ▪️每密钥签名次数有限,远低于标准 SPHINCS+ 的 2⁶⁴。超出后安全性会下降,需要换新密钥 ▪️不适合 zkEVM ▪️需要钱包/账户层做好集成 ▪️签名预算管理、密钥轮换等额外逻辑需要自行处理 尽管有这样那样的不足,且被认为是一个过渡方案,但是确实是目前最现实的纯链上后量子无状态签名方案之一,也能看到ETH在抗量子上的进展和努力 相对来说,BTC上的抗量子升级难度会更大,一方面是社区共识的建立需要更长时间,另一方面是有些方案(比如Blockstream在Liquid上实验的方案)由于BTC主网的限制问题而无法实施 不过,整体来说,整个行业如果在抗量子路上发展,那么未来量子攻击将不会成为一个威胁 #BTC# #ETH#
显示更多
Ethereum can already start preparing accounts for a post quantum world, without waiting for a hard fork. Today, it would be just 0.07$ . Further audits incoming. Though I squeezed in a review with Fable before Uncle Sam crashed my party. Verity formal proof included for my lean enjoyers
显示更多
非常理解您的这个观点 我之前有预料原生拓展方案中引入稳定币(如 $USDT 等)会削弱 $BTC 的本位支付能力,但是我觉得这会是一个流量入口,会增加用户进来之后买入或者支付BTC的可能性 不过,目前我的想法有一些改变,我觉得那可能是我的一厢情愿,因为目前有太多的稳定币通道,如果想买入BTC那么通过其他通道也是可以的,并不会有多少改变,但是削弱的这个劣势是没有降低的 所以,我现在对于原生拓展方案(LN RGB ARK SPARK),如果只是以引入稳定币作为主方向持不赞同的态度,商业性会显得比较强,而对于BTC支付并不能起到增益的效果,甚至是像系统引入了一个“特洛伊木马”,更像是稳定币公司的战略规划而非BTC原生拓展项目该有的规划 当然,有些人会需要使用稳定币,我承认这种需求的存在,只是基于BTC网络本身就有难度和复杂性,如果只是做支付有太多其他的替代路线 从另外一个角度来看,稳定币并没有影响到BTC的“货币储备”叙事,它可能对于目前的智能合约公链未来的影响会更大,那些公链这些年积攒的基建会被稳定币直接吸收为己所用 #BTC# #RGB# #ARK# #LN# #SPARK#
显示更多
"Stablecoins are a gateway drug to Bitcoin."
0
22
18
3
转发到社区
明天晚上20点准备开一个Space,好久没开了,社区成员建议开一开甚至定期开,我努力满足大家要求 RGB茶话会(01):关于RGB,你想要知道的都在这里 🔴自由麦性质,但限于RGB相关话题 🟢RGB协议的技术、发展、进度、动态等都可以聊,有相关问题也可以自由提问 🔵有兴趣的可以边喝茶边参与 #BTC# #RGB#
显示更多
#BTC# #ARK# 终于上主网了,这几天因为“沉迷于”爬山,所以没有第一时间更新 我一直很期待 Second的 Ark实现,因为他们坚持的是很纯粹的BTC支付路线,我很欣赏这种行为,特别是在大家都在鼓吹稳定币的情况下(稳定币在一定程度上我认为是BTC的木马) 之前主网没上线的时候就有过测试,感觉蛮好的,现在终于主网上线了,准备深入使用相关的钱包
显示更多
SECOND IS NOW ON MAINNET. Bark, our implementation of the Ark protocol, is available for anyone to start making bitcoin payments. Included in the launch are our mainnet Ark server, the Bark SDK, and multiple wallets to try from day one.
显示更多
不知不觉, $RGB 突破了新高 我觉得这也是必然的事情,因为 #RGB# 协议有太多的优点可以说、值得说,我也说了很多次了 早期阶段,大幅度的涨涨跌跌都是正常事情 1. 看好的可以保持关注或者保持持仓 2. 觉得有些fomo了的建议适当的落袋为安,浮盈不是盈 3. 不看好的如果有货可以出掉,不然持仓体验差了反而耗散自己的精力 未来的RLN测试,我在构想在社区进行一个大型的测试活动,助力RLN的大规模测试通过(为什么我这么强调大规模测试,因为对于RGB这种复杂协议,没有经历过这样水准测试的产品很难值得信任)
显示更多
0
75
42
2
转发到社区
大胖观察墩(NO.77) ---------------------- 1. $BTC 价格持续下跌,市场上的悲观情绪蔓延,定投抄底持续进行 ▪️60000这个位置大概率会有支撑,至于是不是低并不能确定 ▪️底对于我来说并不重要,定投(从8W多开始的)持续进行中(越跌越有性价比),目前用于定投的资金可以买到10月底 ▪️悲观情绪很多时候源于交易的周期不同和进场策略不同,短周期和长周期对于价格的敏感度是不同的,进场范围的要求也不相同,我属于长周期的那个类型,且投入的是自己分配好的资金,所以感官上并不悲观 ▪️有些人将下跌归咎于Saylor,挺难理解的,你可以说他持有太多是一种风险,但是没有Saylor,也会有Maylor或者Laylor ▪️量子攻击的风险是与日俱增的,但是目前依然有时间来协调和思考方案,不要纠结于意识形态的所谓“审查”问题而是聚焦于方案的推动才是重中之重 2. 美股有回调风险,但Ai趋势不会终结,构建自己的Ai半导体投资策略是必要的 ▪️我觉得当前的美股是有回调风险的,特别是考虑到接下来要面临的巨额IPO,市场流动性会被虹吸 ▪️但是Ai板块的趋势不会因此而终结或者说所谓的“泡沫破灭”,延续性我认为至少能到26年底或者27年上半年,之后就要根据具体情况来看了 ▪️如果认定未来10-20年是Ai的世界,那么在投资领域构建自己的“Ai半导体板块投资策略”是十分必要的,时代的趋势是必须要参与的 3. RGB协议持续发展,ETH上出现新的隐私协议pERC20 ▪️RGB协议还在持续的发展中, @BitlightLabs 团队近期更新了RLN NODE客户端和Wallet版本,下一个版本据说很快就会推出,期望RLN主网尽快上线 ▪️Stashlabs目前在进行内测,内测所反馈的问题完善后会进行公开的测试,可以等公测的时候感受一下 ▪️ $RGB 社区也在不断拓展中,有越来越多的人在了解 #RGB# 协议,社媒上发声不多,部分原因是要积累筹码🤣 ▪️ ETH上新出现一个 pERC20协议 @_pERC20 ,我看了一下,隐私性很强,不过目前协议处于早期阶段,可以保持关注
显示更多
0
13
18
0
转发到社区
正如之前预料的一样:量子技术的发展会比大家想象的快 这会促进大家对于该技术所产生的真实挑战的感知 然后我们可能就能看到更多的协调活动 也可以观察人类群体在面临真实风险时的行动力和决策力 #quantum#
显示更多
Today a crazy quantum story just got wilder. On March 31, the Google Quantum AI team published a landmark result on Shor's algorithm for elliptic curve cryptography. Technically, the paper was a bombshell: a dramatic 10x improvement over the state-of-the-art. As a stunt and wakeup call to the blockchain space, those optimisations were illustrated on secp256k1, the elliptic curve underlying Bitcoin and Ethereum signatures. But perhaps the most striking part of the paper was sociological, not technical. Instead of following standard academic process, the optimisations were kept secret, hidden behind a zero-knowledge (ZK) proof. Google's accompanying blog post mentions they "engaged with the U.S. government". The ZK proof demonstrates the existence of algorithmic improvements without leaking details. Academic censorship with ZK, a historic first! As a co-author of the Google paper I witnessed some of the context surrounding this censorship. To be honest, multiple aspects of that context don't sit well with me. As much as I believe the general public ought to know more, I am limited in my ability to whistleblow. Though let me be clear about one thing: the Google team's professionalism has been absolutely exemplary, and they deserve nothing but praise. Censorship has a way of backfiring. The Streisand effect, where an attempt to bury something only draws more attention to it, is exactly what's unfolding today. First, Google's key optimisation has been rediscovered by the French. And in a thrilling turn of events, a collaborative Shor-at-home challenge just launched. The initiative, available at ecdsa[.]fail, breached a new Shor world record in a matter of hours. Let's start with the rediscovery. Just two months after Google's paper, French quantum expert André Schrottenloher cracks the main secret optimisation. His paper, titled "Optimized Point Addition Circuits for Elliptic Curve Discrete Logarithms", landed on the arXiv today. Big congrats to André, who beat several other nerdsnipped experts to it. In a blog post also published today, Craig Gidney, the world expert on Shor optimisations, revealed that he'd been sitting on this very optimisation for a whole year under censorship pressure. Interestingly, André missed a handful of minor optimisations, both from Google's original publication and from improvements found since. It's plausible there's still plenty of juice left to squeeze out of Shor, and this is exactly what the ecdsa[.]fail challenge is about. The verifier program developed for the ZK proof does double duty, automatically filtering for valid submissions. Dozens of compounding small and micro improvements are rolling in. As of the time of writing there's an 8.4% improvement to Google's circuit, as measured by the product of logical qubit count and Toffoli gate count. Nice! The nerdsnipping ran deeper than anyone expected. Over the last few weeks it became clear it extended well beyond André and other quantum experts. Behind the scenes, a small army of amateurs quietly got to work. Inspired by Karpathy-style autoresearch, they turned AI on Shor. Ironically, the verifier program for the ZK proof makes an ideal reward function for AIs. The barrier to entry for this modern style of research is refreshingly low, with several non-experts, even a teenager, finding nice optimisations. Get in touch if you'd like to join a Telegram group with fellow autoresearchers :) Part 2: neutral atoms and qday The story doesn't end with Google. On the same day Google went public, a stealthy startup called Oratomic published its own Shor paper in a coordinated release. It made a splash, ultimately becoming the most upvoted paper on scirate[.]com, a website ranking arXiv papers. Oratomic's claim was wild. By building on Google's logical optimisations and applying custom physical optimisations for neutral atoms, they claimed just 10K physical qubits were sufficient to run Shor's algorithm on secp256k1. That number is mind-bogglingly low. Knowing essentially nothing about neutral atoms when Oratomic's paper landed, I was intrigued and decided to learn more about the tech. I fell straight down the rabbit hole and spent a couple hundred hours on the topic. I got a little obsessed and watched every YouTube video I could find and spoke to a bunch of experts. My conclusion? The tech is real, very real. Even Google recently decided to start a neutral atom lab, a notable pivot from their sole focus on superconducting qubits. If you care about qday, i.e. the day a quantum computer will break the first piece of cryptography in production, neutral atoms demand your attention. I shared some of my learnings on Shor and neutral atoms in a 30min talk at the ZKProof cryptography conference. You can find it on YouTube by searching "zkproof neutral atom". Here's an interesting observation about this duo of breakthrough papers: neither Google nor Oratomic say a word about what their results mean for qday. No timelines. Zero. Nada. That is especially baffling given that the whole point of whitehat quantum cryptanalysis is to inform qday estimations and help the general public make good decisions. So let me attempt to partially fill the silence, similarly to what Scott Aaronson did in his April 29 post. Given everything I know, including scary non-public information, I now put the odds of qday by 2032 at 50%. 10% by 2030. Anecdotally, the US government has its own date: 2035. Originating at the NSA and later adopted by NIST, it's when branches of the US government will be disallowed from using quantum-vulnerable cryptography. In plain language: with hindsight, that date is a joke and should be discounted entirely. I don't see how NIST avoids being forced to pull it forward by years. Part 3: post-quantum cryptography There are good reasons to sound the alarm today, but please do not panic. Rushing carelessly towards immature post-quantum cryptography is a recipe for disaster. IMO a good target date for migration is 2029, roughly 3.5 years out. 2029 happens to be the date selected by Google, Cloudflare, and the Ethereum Foundation. These days most of my time goes to safely migrating Ethereum towards post-quantum cryptography as part of the broader lean Ethereum effort. There's a lot to do. We need to rip out and replace BLS signatures at the consensus layer, KZG commitments at the data layer, and ECDSA signatures at the execution layer. The plan to get there is compelling, and is based on hash-based cryptography. Within the Ethereum Foundation we've developed a Swiss army knife called leanVM (github[.]com/leanEthereum/leanVM) powered by the magic of hash-based SNARKs. Thanks to truly exceptional work by Emile, Thomas, and others, its performance is derisked. Regarding security, leanVM is a jewel, a minimal zkVM crafted for end-to-end formal verification and maximum security. Want to help? There are two $1M initiatives. First, the Proximity Prize (proximityprize[.]org). Solve a long-standing mathematical conjecture in coding theory, improve hash-based SNARKs, and go home a millionaire. Second, the Poseidon Initiative (poseidon-initiative[.]info), offers $1M for breaking Poseidon, the SNARK-friendly hash function.
显示更多
区块链被收编的既视感 只能拿好自己的 $BTC 然后等等看 貌似也没有其他办法了
#BTC# 1. 第一点赞同 ▪️在中本聪的设计中,强调的是“P2P Electronic Cash”,现在核心宣传的是“Store of Value”,属于社区后期发展中的偏离 ▪️关于支付,其提出的观点是“Bitcoin isn't currently practical for very small micropayments... it will eventually be as storage and bandwidth costs continue to fall.”,但是实际上这一点目前来说已经不现实了,而闪电网络等支付没有成为主流,RGB/Ark等还在早期阶段,稳定币支付反而成为了主流 2. 第二点基本赞同 ▪️在白皮书的设计中,理念是“Proof-of-work is essentially one-CPU-one-vote” ▪️他预期了硬件会专业化,“It'll get a lot harder when competition makes the automatic adjustment drive up the difficulty”,但是没有预想到ASIC的极端垄断及由此引起的矿池集中,不过这看起来更像是技术/经济演进的结果 3. 第三点不赞同 ▪️在BTC的设计中,其强调的是“伪匿名性”(pseudonymity),而不是“高匿名性”或者“不可追踪” ▪️他给出了关于隐私的一些处理方法: 1)隐私仍可通过在另一处切断信息流来维持:保持公钥匿名 2)作为额外防火墙,每次交易使用新密钥对,防止它们被关联到共同所有者 3)公众可以看到有人向另一个人发送金额,但没有将交易关联到任何人的信息 ref: ▪️他承认交易公开可被分析,建议“最好只用一次地址”,这也是早期钱包采用HD WALLET的原因 ▪️所以高匿名本身就不是设计的初衷,而可能属于社区解读 4. 观察中 ▪️in a few decades... transaction fees will become the main compensation,依赖交易手续费确实是长期的设计 ▪️但是当前的区块奖励依然不低,矿工依然存在利润,这个过渡阶段并不一定是短时间,目前这种争夺还不那么明显 ▪️我们同时可以看到,随着未来如果要把fee定义为核心收入,BTC网络的拓展也在缓慢的推进(以周期为单位),如Simplicity、RGB、BitVM等不同维度技术的发展 ▪️所以,我认为依然需要观望,现在还未可知
显示更多
比特币发展至今和中本聪最初想法不一样的地方: 1、电子现金变成了数字黄金,基本无法用于日常支付 2、CPU 挖矿变 ASIC 挖矿,算力被大矿工和矿池一定程度垄断 3、隐私从设想中的高度匿名变成链上相对可追踪 4、激励没有成功转向设想中依赖交易手续费
显示更多
RGB协议(05/29) 1. 关于RGB Payjoin @Rgb__Market 更新将要支持 #RGB# Payjoin交易模式,我解释一下这个模式: ▪️Payjoin这个方式是 @BitlightLabs 提出的RGB资产在主网的非托管交易形式,技术方案详见: ▪️我看到有人说这种方式需要“在线”,其实这个在线跟大家想象中的在线不一样,不是说你要一直守在那,是你需要参与到整个过程的几次交互中(比如一方构建psbt,另一方完善psbt,一方签名,另一方签名然后广播),类似于我们购物那种“下单-付款-发货”(不一定类比的对啊)这种在线的意思,在有社交信息配合的情况下,只是麻烦了些,但是非托管 ▪️如果他们能推出这个方式的市场,会增加他们在RGB生态中的占位 2. 关于RLN RLN主网上线了不是说像“破纪录”那种一个点一样,而是一个过程,RLN主网也需要大规模的测试,从而找出可能存在的问题,然后才是稳定的RLN主网版本,这是协议走向生产级必须要经历的 所以,可以把RLN主网上线当作一个突破性的事件来看待,但是要明白它不是一蹴而就的 我也在思考如何能帮助进行大规模测试,也许可以搞一个 ”RGB火炬计划” 快速的增加RLN的使用来助力测试 3. 关于RGB资产的转移形式 RGB的交易形式跟传统的形式不同,所以有些人觉得不适应,其实这种交易形式有自己很独特的好处: ▪️每个人的地址就相当于自己的“家”,在一般的区块链系统中,别人可以随便往你家里丢垃圾,甚至丢带毒的垃圾,你不会觉得这是很无语的事情吗?而RGB的这种转移形式就完全规避了这个问题,我的“家”我做主,别人是进不来的,哪怕是转移也是一次性的授权,我规定的资产,我规定的数量 ▪️这种形式还解决了另外一个问题:不会转错,想一想每年有多少人因为转错而丢失了多少资产 ▪️更不要说这种方式的隐私性是多么强,对于有些人来说,隐私才是最重要的事情,而不是其他 4. 关于$RGB 很多人问目前 $RGB 的情况,我说一下我的核心看法: ▪️如果你相信 #RGB# 协议,那么是需要非常关注 $RGB 的,因为如果RGB协议成功了,那么一定会有一个图腾出现,这个图腾必然是 $RGB ;如果你不相信,那么一定不要参与 ▪️目前的价格大概是$0.25,市值约$5M,考虑到约有30%的burn情况,实际市值约$3.5M ▪️RGB的上限在哪里,我真不知道,因为抬头看不到 投资有风险,所以任何投资都需要自己做好规划,并对自己的资金负责,其他人(也就是我)无法对你负责
显示更多
0
14
42
10
转发到社区
@TrderCHFMY 我有种感觉, $RGB 有机会成为一个“现象级”标的
我现在终于理解,为什么「知识对齐」这么难了: ▪️每个人认知水平本来就不一样,隔行如隔山,哪怕现在有Ai的帮助,但是问不到点子上,就很有可能掌握不到关键的部分,而这部分才是问题的核心和真相 ▪️很多人都不太爱学习,缺少主动探索和纠偏的想法,很容易随大流,容易被其他人的看法所影响(包括我自己),所以有可能对齐到 “偏颇或错误的知识” ▪️一旦涉及到利益,知识就容易变得“扭曲”,比如只说好的不说坏的、怎么都是利好、内心只偏向对自己有利的判断或论述、睁眼说瞎话(我自己也会犯这样的错误)......这是人性使然 所以,如果面临这种情况,该怎么办呢?也许最好的方式确实不是“争论”,而是顺其自然
显示更多
继续Building 属于 #RGB# 的时刻定会来临!
RGB Lightning Node v0.0.3 is now live. Public repo: This release focuses on wallet security and client lifecycle management — laying the groundwork for a production-ready self-custodial experience. Key updates: — Wallet Security: Password-protected wallet creation and import. Mnemonic backup now available in Settings with password verification. — Client Lock: Lock the control panel when stepping away. Password required to resume. — Exit Flow: Clean exit confirmation with proper session teardown. The RGB Lightning Node is becoming a complete desktop environment for managing tokenized assets over Bitcoin's Lightning Network — not just a dev tool, but a product. Make Bitcoin Smart.
显示更多
如果你不清楚 #RGB# 的潜能,可以阅读一下Ajan老师在2023年写的这篇文章: 借用文中最后一句话: 这也解释了,为什么不理解比特币的人,将很难理解 RGB。而喜欢比特币的人,会认可 RGB 已经作出的设计。 #RGB# $RGB
显示更多
作为一个长期布道 #RGB# 的研究者,我对于项目愿意参与RGB生态十分欢迎 对于StashLabs一直以来展现出来的长期且稳健的态度表示肯定 申请参与测试! #RGB# $RGB
显示更多
0
19
26
0
转发到社区