1. 币安用户UID存在撞号 2. 2月4号资产丢失 3. 警察、律师、大使馆都找过 4. 两位警官发起执法请求，币安以「不具有属地执法权」强硬拒绝配合 5. 事发后，我第一时间，就向产品经理反馈了产品层面的风险，希望平台能够正视问题、避免类似情况再次发生。产品经理已读不回

X AI ALGORITHM UPDATE 🚨 X updated their open source algorithm yesterday and the early likes matter even more now. Small accounts should focus on: writing posts people hit like on and read till the end (so write to be read) tl;dr: - X's open source code got new scores on Nov 5, the first change in 3 weeks - likes: 0.66 → 0.708 (highest yet) - time spent on a post: 0.006 → 0.0075 - tapping into a post: 0.3 → 0.274 - opening a video: 0.02 → 0 - new rule: AI replies may get flagged under big accounts as "llm slop" and may not reach the person's notifications lesson learned: a tap isn't the win anymore. Someone staying and liking is. full details: - The new numbers Up: likes 0.66 → 0.708, time spent on a post 0.006 → 0.0075, shares 2 → 2.118. Down: tapping into a post 0.3 → 0.274, staying 10+ seconds after a tap 0.4 → 0.385, opening a video 0.02 → 0. "Not interested" got a bit harsher, -52.27 → -53.07. Copy link, replies, quotes, DM shares and follows didn't move. X didn't explain any of this. It's just what the code says now. (I check the open source algo daily with Claude and share updates with you) - Look at where this has gone in a month In early October a like was worth 0.5. Now it's 0.708. Time spent was 0.004. Now it's 0.0075, nearly double. A tap was 0.3 and it's going down. Every change points the same way. X keeps paying more for people who stay. - Why that matters if you're small My read: you can't win on big numbers, but you can win on the people who do see your post. If they stay and like it, that counts for more today than it did last week. And those early likes also decide which new post gets the extra push. - Video and your profile X also switched on two new guesses in its ranking: how long someone keeps watching after they open a video, and how long they spend on a profile after tapping it. I can't tell you what those are worth. The only file that lists them is out of date, so I won't guess a number. My read: opening a video dropped to 0 the same day because X cares more about people who keep watching. So make the first seconds count, and make your profile worth sticking around on. - A new rule for replies under big accounts X runs an AI check on replies under accounts with over 250K followers. Flagged replies can get a label that lasts 14 to 30 days. One of the flags is literally called "llm slop" (AI slop, as I read it). That part isn't new. This is: X's rules now say a labeled reply or mention doesn't reach the person's notifications unless they follow you. Grey badge accounts and accounts X rates as highly credible skip this label. Small accounts get no such pass. I can see the rule, I can't see if every notification goes through it yet. Either way, write your own replies. - What didn't change Your new posts still get their extra push in the first 2 hours and first 200 views, and they still don't get cut first. Here's a recap of what you should be doing: - likes just hit 0.708, the most they've ever been worth - each second someone spends on your post is worth 25% more than last week - staying 10+ seconds after a tap earns 0.385 on top of the tap - reply in your own words, under big accounts especially - make your profile worth a visit, X now guesses how long people spend there - for video, hold attention early, just getting the open now scores 0 - being read to the end also helps X find you new readers - originals from accounts below 50K can jump to around spot 16 - early viewers liking it is what wins that lift - your first 2 hours and 200 views are the window, so publish when your people are online - the biggest single number is still 20, for someone copying your link - quotes, DM shares and replies earn 5 apiece - back and forth between mutuals is worth 20, so follow back your regulars - strangers only get shown your originals - the 1st like and the 32nd like each open another route to new people - a second post of yours in the same feed drops to 62%, so make one count - the video lists want clips over 10 seconds - +4 when a post is likely to earn you a new follower - your pinned post can affect the whole account, so take a look at it What you should NOT be doing: - pasting AI replies under big accounts, "llm slop" is a real flag at X - copy-paste replies, a duplicate label means they never get notified - chasing the tap, it's down to 0.274 and falling - off-topic posts, one likely "not interested" costs -53.07 - a video that only gets opened earns nothing for the open - publishing at 3am burns your 2 hour window - relying on replies and reposts to reach new people, they stay with your followers - getting an insult label, non-followers won't see that post at all - low quality and misinfo labels bring a warning, and non-followers can't like or share - adult media in 3 of your last 5 posts gets the whole account labeled - X rechecks videos for hidden content at 64 and 512 likes - piling your replies under a big account's post can sink your own score - one label on the account and non-followers stop seeing you - a link to a badly rated site in your pinned post risks a 7 day label - reusing your own wording word for word risks the copypasta flag - pairing a low quality link with tags of strangers looks like spam to X - engagement bait gets labeled no matter how big you are - posting several in a row, they fight each other for the same feed - hashtag stuffing does nothing - counting on bookmarks, they're worth 0 - expecting For You to show a post past 48 hours

お仕事でいろいろあり(まだ言えない)、良い機会だから 最近、ビットコインとか暗号資産の勉強を始めたぜ。 ほんと最近どうなってんのか分からないから、詳しい⽅がいたら⾊々教えてください🙏

懂王的共和党惨败，民主党拿下参众两院。 红党还是输了，而且这次输得一点都不冤。蓝党几乎是碾压式胜利。懂王连胜选后给大家发5000美元红包这种话都放出来了，结果还是没能挽回局面。只能说，共和党这次是真的不得民心，连懂王画的饼，选民都不愿意再买账了。 蓝党一向主张对科技行业加强监管，相比之下，他们更关注性别、环保、动物保护这些议题。接下来最让人担心的，反而是美股这波高科技公司能不能扛得住。政策风向一变，科技巨头恐怕又要面临一轮新的监管压力。 更有意思的是，共和党赢的时候，A股科创板就能跟着爆拉。看来大A也知道，共和党上台可能会自废武功，看来东升西降这个剧本还得往下演。 接下来就看老马、奥特曼、老黄这些科技圈大佬能不能扛住了。 最后，希望共和党能继续努力，争取把198种性别研究到3000种，我相信在AI的帮助下这事儿并不难。另外还可以找赛考斯基带你们来中国和殷玉珍好好取取经，学学怎么种树。 毕竟，环保动保这件事，不能光靠坐在马路中间堵汽车。真想保护环境，不如踏踏实实种点树，至少还能给后代六点东西。

Introducing Sterling: Inference from verified providers. The model you’re paying for might not be the one answering you. Every API model is served by a provider. Some serve a smaller version. Some break tool calls. Sterling tests all providers and routes to the verified ones.

都没心情分析了，跌成傻逼了。 BTC都又涨到8w了，但是我的美股不仅盘中跌，盘后还他妈的在跌。唯一庆幸的是我没玩合约，手里都是现货。要是有合约这波真是直接爆炸。 唯一庆幸的是两件事： 1. 前几天卖掉了全部短期仓位，算是躲过一劫。 2. $INTC 在90多的时候卖了大部分仓位加到了 $SPCX 上，躲过了 $INTC 的腰斩。这个 $INTC 跌的比土狗还像土狗，真是服了。我现在每天都买一点，希望早点来一波像样的反弹。 现在就一个愿望，别跌了，行不行？我真的还有家人要养。

. @primus_labs 刚发了一篇对于【隐私】方案怎么解决的推文。 这其实就是 Primus 的创新。 平常我们看待隐私，第一反应就是隐藏数据。但真正进入金融和商业场景后，会发现单纯隐藏数据并不能解决所有问题。 举个例子，假设一个机构需要证明自己有足够的偿付能力，或者一个用户需要证明自己符合某项借贷条件。传统方式要么公开数据，让第三方进行核验；要么隐藏数据，但同时也失去了可信验证的能力。 这中间其实存在一个很大的技术缺口：能不能在不泄露原始数据的情况下，证明数据真实有效？能不能在不解密的情况下，直接对敏感数据进行计算？ 这也是 Primus 要解决的问题。它通过 ZK（零知识证明）和 FHE（全同态加密）解决这两个不同但又紧密相关的问题。 ZK 解决的是可信验证，FHE 解决的是隐私计算。两者结合，意味着数据不必在隐私和可用性之间二选一。 我认为，这才是隐私技术真正有价值的应用方向。尤其是未来链上金融、信用评估和机构级数据协作，既要保证数据安全，又要保证结果可信，单纯的加密或透明都远远不够。 最后，Primus 有链上声望任务可以做，大家不要错过。

好了，昨天玩偶姐姐全球可飞的谣言图被几个流量乞丐传爆了之后，我币安后台收到近50份5万的转账，接近250万美元。 虽然我也不去，但250款我也不退啊。bushi😋

懂王的共和党惨败，民主党拿下参众两院。 红党还是输了，而且这次输得一点都不冤。蓝党几乎是碾压式胜利。懂王连胜选后给大家发5000美元红包这种话都放出来了，结果还是没能挽回局面。只能说，共和党这次是真的不得民心，连懂王画的饼，选民都不愿意再买账了。 蓝党一向主张对科技行业加强监管，相比之下，他们更关注性别、环保、动物保护这些议题。接下来最让人担心的，反而是美股这波高科技公司能不能扛得住。政策风向一变，科技巨头恐怕又要面临一轮新的监管压力。 更有意思的是，共和党赢的时候，A股科创板就能跟着爆拉。看来大A也知道，共和党上台可能会自废武功，看来东升西降这个剧本还得往下演。 接下来就看老马、奥特曼、老黄这些科技圈大佬能不能扛住了。 最后，希望共和党能继续努力，争取把198种性别研究到3000种，我相信在AI的帮助下这事儿并不难。另外还可以找赛考斯基带你们来中国和殷玉珍好好取取经，学学怎么种树。 毕竟，环保动保这件事，不能光靠坐在马路中间堵汽车。真想保护环境，不如踏踏实实种点树，至少还能给后代六点东西。

从预测市场来看，懂王这次要输啊。 目前PM上面的赔率，参议院上民主党获胜的概率是77%，众议院上民主党获胜的概率是95%🥲🥲 不过在懂王的好日子结束前，我的好日子提前结束了，美股真给我跌麻。 以后要加大指数的仓位，减少个股的仓位。不然碰上这种行情太难熬了。