2026年8月14日吴秋雨父亲发出控告书并寄送至以下单位，请各位领导及时查收！ 北海市委政法委 北海市中级人民法院 北海市人民检察院 北海市监察委员会 北海市妇女联合会 北海市未成年人保护委员会 北海市人民代表大会常务委员会 广西壮族自治区党委政法委 广西壮族自治区高级人民法院 广西壮族自治区人民检察院 广西壮族自治区监察委员会 广西壮族自治区妇女联合会 广西壮族自治区未成年人保护委员会 广西壮族自治区人民代表大会常务委员会 控告书及控告事项   请求依法监督北海市银海区人民法院立即纠正拖延办理吴秋雨取保候审问题。检察院已建议缓刑，继续羁押已无必要，应依法变更强制措施，保障被告人及未成年子女合法权益。 事实与理由   吴秋雨因涉嫌非法经营罪一案，被北海市银海区人民检察院审查起诉至北海市银海区人民法院。   经审查，银海区人民检察院已依法向法院提出对吴秋雨适用缓刑的量刑建议。在此情况下，法院本应依法变更强制措施，但长期未予办理取保候审，导致吴秋雨持续羁押。   吴秋雨本人认为其行为不构成犯罪，但考虑到自己有两个年幼孩子需要照顾，为尽快回家履行母亲监护责任，在对司法机关信任基础上签署认罪认罚具结书。两个孩子分别仅3岁10个月和2岁7个月，母亲长期羁押已造成实际监护困难。   同时，吴秋雨自2018年起患有精神疾病，需要长期服药治疗。羁押期间因精神压力和与孩子分离等原因，出现失眠、病情加重等情况，目前用药量增加，继续羁押可能对其身体健康造成严重影响。 控告人认为   一、 人民检察院已依法提出缓刑建议，被告人具备变更强制措施必要性，人民法院仍长期不办理取保候审，损害司法程序公正。   二、 吴秋雨患有精神疾病，又承担两个幼儿监护责任，继续羁押不符合司法保护人权和未成年人利益最大化原则。   三、 吴秋雨基于对司法机关的信任作出认罪认罚选择，如相关从宽措施不能落实，将影响认罪认罚制度的严肃性和公信力。 控告请求   一、 请求北海市有关监督机关依法介入调查，督促银海区人民法院立即审查并依法办理吴秋雨取保候审。   二、 请求北海市中级人民法院依法监督纠正银海区人民法院拖延办理强制措施变更问题。   三、 请求检察机关依法履行法律监督职责，对违法拖延行为提出纠正意见。   四、 请求相关部门关注吴秋雨两个未成年子女及患病被告人的特殊情况，依法保障其合法权益。   控告人：吴秋雨父亲   日期：2026年8月14日

今天上午（2026.8.14周五），吴秋雨父亲、汪中长老妻子到了北海市人民检察院、北海市政法委驻地—信访局，提交了不构成非法经营罪的专业意见和取保候审的诉求，银海区法院再继续羁押锡安教会汪中、吴秋雨，没有任何合法性、合理性，也不符合人们的良心判断。故此，请求北海市检察院、政法委督促银海区法院纠正滥权羁押、立即取保汪中、吴秋雨。 诉求如下： 北海市政法委： 关于北海市银海区人民法院受理的被告人吴秋雨涉嫌非法经营罪一案，我们有相关的法律专业意见，本案不构成非法经营罪，详见附件。 根据其个人健康状况，两娃年幼（一个3岁10个月，一个2岁7个月），吴秋雨签了认罪认罚，目的是尽快回家。 检察院已经建议法院取保放人，但北海市银海区人民法院却无故拖延至今，要求监督法院立即取保放人。 我们可以保证，取保之后，我们会配合法院开庭安排。但继续稱押，导致认罪认罚的初衷落空，必然导致撤销认罪认罚的考量。 吴秋雨父亲 2026年8月14日

#释放锡安教案汪中长老！# 汪中长老无罪! 在连检察院都已经给出准予取保候审的意见之下，北海市银海区法院却迟迟推脱，延长时间，到底还有没有良知？ 年迈的父亲在ICU 重症监护室苦苦等待唯一的儿子前来见最后一面；冷漠的人以“不成为理由的理由”在拖延！ 请大家为汪中长老祷告🙏 我们要禁食祷告🙏 求主垂听我们的祷告 使得父亲心中有平安 王长老人生中无遗憾！

基督徒为什么会被突然消失？ 为什么家人们得不到被抓捕原因？ “山东济南基督教长春里教会牧师王三元，3月17日被警察带走，至今没有消息。山东教会牧师金先生近日告诉本台，王三元的妻子和儿女不知道他被带走的原因，也没有收到有关部门的通知。金牧师对本台说：“目前官方没有通报原因，家里的儿女、他的太太都不知道原因，忽然被带走，也没有通知家属。我认为官方这次是对王牧师采取报复性抓捕。”公开流传的一则教会消息提到，王三元今年73岁，患有心脑血管疾病，曾多次住院。消息说，王三元“从3月17日进去到现在什么问题都没查出来”，并呼吁教友为他祷告。 。。。。。。” 我们除了要祷告🙏这是基督徒的本分，也要有勇气质问，是谁抓走了牧者？为什么这么荒诞的事情，层出不穷？到底对基督徒的任意打压和欺凌要到几时停止？ 為禱告：

8月9日中国受逼迫教会禁食祷告日聚会在大阪顺利、圆满结束，感谢神的带领和保守！ 感谢大阪多民族基督教会、道之爱荆棘火新生命团契、雅歌堂教会的牧者联合承办。 感谢每一位牧者的分享与各方面的摆上。 感谢现场的统筹，翻译、技术同工，及制作海报、PPT配搭的每一位弟兄姊妹。 愿一切荣耀归给神！

锡安家书--汪中长老的妻子童红⁩师母的代祷信 我是汪中的妻子。今日怀着万分焦急和沉痛的心情，请大家为我代祷 我丈夫汪中的案件目前已经进入审判阶段，检察机关在审查后已依法提出建议适用缓刑，并向贵院发函建议变更强制措施。由此可见，案件事实、性质以及量刑情节已经有了明确的审查意见，被告人具有适用非羁押措施的现实基础。 然而，此时我们家庭正面临着无法承受的巨大悲痛。我的公公，也就是被告人汪中的父亲，已经96岁高龄，目前正在ICU病房抢救，生命垂危。老人年事已高，随时可能离开人世。作为父亲，他最大的心愿或许就是在生命最后时刻再见儿子一面；作为儿子，我丈夫也迫切希望能够陪伴父亲走完人生最后一程，尽到一个儿子最后的孝道。 人生无常，生死不能等待。一次见面，可能就是父子之间最后的告别，也是老人一生最后的牵挂。如果错过这个机会，将会成为我们全家永远无法弥补的遗憾。 我们理解并尊重法院依法审查社会危险性的程序，也理解需要向户籍地派出所核实相关情况。但目前检察机关已经建议适用缓刑，案件情况已经较为明确，也不存在妨碍诉讼的现实风险。户籍地核实工作可以依法进行，但恳请法院在法律允许范围内，充分考虑当前特殊、紧急的人道情况，尽快推动相关程序，不要因核实过程中的等待，让一个96岁老人留下终生遗憾。 我的丈夫一直积极配合法院审理，并愿意严格遵守取保候审期间的各项规定，接受公安机关、法院的监督管理。我们家属也愿意承担监督责任，确保其随传随到，不影响案件正常审理。 恳请法院在依法办案的同时，给予这个濒临破碎的家庭一次人道关怀，尽快批准变更强制措施，让一个96岁的父亲能够在生命最后时刻见到自己的儿子，也让我的丈夫能够尽最后一次为人子的责任。⁩ #锡安109教案# #释放汪中长老#

晚10:40，汪中长老的妻子童红继续在法院外等待结果。汪长老的父亲还在等着，流着泪的等着，见儿子的最后一面。汪长老的身体也非常不好。若知道父亲没能见到最后一面就离世了，也不知道他身体会如何。 之前严法官和她的助理接待了她，让她做了笔录，说一个小时之内给结果。 停止推卸责任！人命关天的时刻，请广西壮族自治区高院院长@黄海龙和北海市中院院长@吴莹 今天早上北京时间9点，突然接到汪中妻子的代祷信息： 恳请为汪中父亲代祷，现在在医院抢救，高浓度吸氧，血氧只有58了，已经97岁了。老人临终之前最大的心愿就是见到自己的儿子。 汪中长老为人谦和，一直乐于帮助身边有需要的人，引导年轻人找到人生的方向，帮助婚姻破碎的家庭重建…… Elder Wang Zhongchang’s wife, Tong Hong, continued to wait outside the court for the result. Elder Wang’s father was still waiting, waiting in tears, to see his son one last time. Elder Wang’s health was also very poor. If he learned that his father had passed away without being able to see him one last time, there is no telling how his body would hold up.​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​ Elder Wang Zhong’s wife, Tong Hong, has been waiting in front of the court for 4 hours. Judge Yan and her assistant just received her and had her give a formal statement, saying they would provide a result within an hour. Stop delaying and sending her elsewhere! At a moment when a life hangs in the balance, we call on the High Court of the Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region (Huang Hailong) and the President of the Beihai Intermediate Court (Wu Ying).​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​ #释放汪中# #FreeWangZhong# #锡安109教案#

汪中长老的妻子童红现在在法院外已等了‼️4个小时‼️之前严法官和她的助理接待了她，让她做了笔录，说一个小时之内给结果。 停止推卸责任！人命关天的时刻，请广西壮族自治区高院院长@黄海龙和北海市中院院长@吴莹 今天早上北京时间9点，突然接到汪中妻子的代祷信息： 恳请为汪中父亲代祷，现在在医院抢救，高浓度吸氧，血氧只有58了，已经97岁了。老人临终之前最大的心愿就是见到自己的儿子。 汪中长老为人谦和，一直乐于帮助身边有需要的人，引导年轻人找到人生的方向，帮助婚姻破碎的家庭重建…… Elder Wang Zhong has a 97-year-old father who may be on his deathbed. We are praying that the court will allow him to see his father one last time before it is too late。 Elder Wang Zhong’s wife, Tong Hong, has been waiting in front of the court for 4 hours. Judge Yan and her assistant just received her and had her give a formal statement, saying they would provide a result within an hour. Stop delaying and sending her elsewhere! At a moment when a life hangs in the balance, we call on the High Court of the Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region (Huang Hailong) and the President of the Beihai Intermediate Court (Wu Ying).​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​ #释放汪中# #FreeWangZhong# #锡安109教案#

#立即释放汪中长老# 十万火急！汪中长老父亲正在抢救——请北海法院立即放人，让他见父亲最后一面！ 汪中长老的父亲目前正在医院紧急抢救，情况危急。作为儿子，他最大的心愿，就是能够赶回父亲身边，见父亲最后一面。 这不是特殊待遇，而是最基本的人道关怀。 我们紧急呼吁北海有关法院及办案机关：请立即采取人道措施，允许汪中长老回家探望病危父亲，让一位儿子能够见父亲最后一面，不要让这成为一个家庭终生无法弥补的遗憾！ 检察院已经给予缓刑量刑，继续羁押毫无道理！！！ 请立即放人！让汪中长老见父亲最后一面！

吴秋雨因为参与线上神学教育课程的行政工作，被认为利用信息网络从事非法的商业活动，起诉书上写，“未经许可利用信息网络非法销售涉宗教内容的课程包，收取非法经营款”，因此被起诉“非法经营罪”。事实上，收取的费用是注册费，旨在帮助学生完成学业，对于完成学业的优秀学生都有退还注册费的记录，已经有很多收到退费的学员愿意公开声明。 将其判定为盈利的经营活动显然缺乏说服力。起诉书上提到吴秋雨获得的非法经营款是39.9万元，这是她2020年至2025年的所有所得。事实上，这是这几年她在教会服事的供养，说得通俗点就是工资。乍一看40万似乎挺多，2020年到2025年平均到每个月才5500元，这个可能跟北京保安的收入差不多。她是北京人，中学就读北京四中，大学毕业于北京大学，后来去美国波斯顿的哥顿康威尔（Gordon-Conwell）获得硕士学位，以她的学历和能力，要靠这个来盈利，简直是荒唐至极！这么判，只是显出审判者的荒谬和可笑！

紧急代求 本月5日早上7时30分左右，温州城市（家庭）标竿教会主任牧师、温州家庭教会负责人汤大卫牧师，与一位负责对外宣教账户管理的财务同工以及身处上海的五位教会同工，被上海警方带走。 据悉，相关人员被关押在崇明区看守所，但是被带走的具体原因和目前状况，警方尚未对外公布，教会方面仍在持续了解情况，并积极寻求法律协助及进一步信息。 请弟兄姐妹继续切切代祷，求神保守汤大卫牧师及所有被带走的弟兄同工，在未知的环境中赐下平安、智慧与力量；也求神保守他们的家人，在焦急等候中得着安慰与坚固。同时，恳请有关部门依法保障相关人员的合法权益，依法公开案件信息，确保程序公正、合法。

@北海检察院检察长：叶发强、吴国 成、李苑华 @北海市人民检察院副检察长：潘远霞 331卷卷宗，6万多页材料。 律师不到两周时间根本无法阅完。 请问，你们是否已经完整审查了全部卷宗？如果没有，又为何如此匆忙推进案件程序？

起诉书上提到吴秋雨的非法所得，其实就是这几年她在教会服事的供养，说得通俗点就是工资。乍一看40万似乎挺多，2020年到2025年平均到每个月才5500元，这个可能跟北京保安的收入差不多。以她的学历和能力，要靠这个来盈利，简直是荒唐至极！法院这么判，只是显出你们的荒谬和可笑！ The indictment mentions Wu Qiuyu’s “illegal gains,” which were in fact the financial support she received over these years for her service in the church—put more plainly, her salary. At first glance 400,000 yuan may look like a lot, but averaged over 2020–2025 it comes to only about 5,500 yuan a month, roughly the same as a security guard’s pay in Beijing. Given her education and abilities, the idea that she was “profiting” from this is utterly absurd! The court’s ruling only exposes how ridiculous and laughable you are. #锡安109教案# #释放吴秋雨#

锡安教案律师们陆续收到通知，8月10日开庭前会议；8月14-18日进行公开开庭审理。有律师刚拿到卷宗都没有来得及看完厚达300卷的内容，律师提交的调查取证申请根本不给时间！开庭时间应该由庭前会议沟通后确认，现在就定下时间很显然是想走过场，草草结案，试问这些执法机构岂不是知法犯法？！连基本的法律程序都抛在一边了！ #锡安109教案# @VOAChinese @dashengmedia @nytchinese @RFA_Chinese @RFI_Cn @china_action @bbcchinese

广西壮族自治区北海市银海区人民检察院起诉书 北银检刑诉〔2026〕Z1号 被告人王林，男，1981年3月20日出生，公民身份号码*******,汉族,大学本科文化,户籍所在地广东省*******。因涉嫌非法利用信息网络罪，于2025年10月11日被北海市公安局银海分局刑事拘留，同年11月17日经本院批准逮捕，次日由北海市公安局银海分局执行逮捕。 被告人高颖佳，男，1978年8月31日出生，公民身份号码*******,汉族，博士研究生文化，户籍所在地北京市*******。因涉嫌非法利用信息网络罪，于2025年10月11日被北海市公安局银海分局刑事拘留，同年11月17日经本院批准逮捕，次日由北海市公安局银海分局执行逮捕。 被告人尹会彬，男，1967年9月23日出生，公民身份号码*******,汉族，大专文化，户籍所在地河北省*******。因涉嫌非法利用信息网络罪，于2025年10月11日被北海市公安局银海分局刑事拘留，同年11月17日经本院批准逮捕，次日由北海市公安局银海分局执行逮捕。 被告人王聪，女，1982年10月11日出生，公民身份号码*******,汉族，大学本科文化，户籍所在地吉林省*******。因涉嫌非法利用信息网络罪，于2025年10月12日被北海市公安局银海分局刑事拘留，同年11月17日经本院批准逮捕，次日由北海市公安局银海分局执行逮捕。 被告人刘桢彬，男，1987年1月5日出生，公民身份号码*******,汉族，硕士研究生文化，户籍所在地湖北省*******。因涉嫌非法利用信息网络罪，于2025年10月11日被北海市公安局银海分局刑事拘留，同年11月17日经本院批准逮捕，次日由北海市公安局银海分局执行逮捕。 被告人林书铖(曾用名林叔阳),男，1991年9月16日出生，公民身份号码*******,汉族，大学本科文化，户籍所在地山西省*******。因涉嫌非法利用信息网络罪，于2025年10月12日被北海市公安局银海分局刑事拘留，同年11月17日经本院批准逮捕，次日由北海市公安局银海分局执行逮捕。 被告人汪中(曾用名汪忠),男，1967年9月9日出生，公民身份号码*******,汉族，硕士研究生文化，户籍所在地辽宁省*******。因涉嫌非法利用信息网络罪，于2025年10月21日被北海市公安局银海分局刑事拘留，同年11月17日经本院批准逮捕，次日由北海市公安局银海分局执行逮捕。 被告人吴秋雨，女，1989年8月19日出生，公民身份号码*******,汉族，硕士研究生文化，户籍所在地及居住地北京市*******。因涉嫌非法利用信息网络罪，于2025年10月12日被北海市公安局银海分局刑事拘留，同年11月17日经本院批准逮捕，次日由北海市公安局银海分局执行逮捕。 本案由广西壮族自治区北海市公安局银海分局侦查终结，以被告人王林、高颖佳、尹会彬等八人涉嫌诈骗罪、非法经营罪，于2026年6月18日向本院移送审查起诉。本院受理后，于2026年6月19日已告知被告人有权委托辩护人和认罪认罚可能导致的法律后果，依法讯问了被告人，听取了辩护人的意见，审查了全部案件材料。 经依法审查查明： 一、诈骗罪 2007年，金明日(另案处理)未按照国家宗教管理规定向相关管理部门登记和备案，未取得在国内合法传教批准的情况下，在北京市非法成立“北京锡安教会”,被告人王林、高颖佳、尹会彬、王聪、刘桢彬、林书铖等人加入教会共同进行非法宗教活动。 2018年9月9日，“北京锡安教会”被北京市朝阳区民政局依法取缔。金明日、被告人尹会彬等人先后到北海市居住生活并继续开展非法宗教活动。被告人王林、高颖佳、尹会彬、王聪、刘桢彬、林书钺以牧师身份，分别负责长三角牧区、京津冀牧区、长三角和京津冀以外的大牧区、京津冀分牧区、青岛牧区、成都牧区的传教事务。被告人一伙明知教会被取缔且自己不具备合法传教资格，仍冒充宗教教职人员以牧师身份在互联网和线下各地 开展非法传教活动，骗取信徒的“奉献金”人民币(以下均为同一币种)1000余万元。 至案发，被告人王林分得赃款124.405万元，高颖佳分得赃款115.5464万元，尹会彬分得赃款56.3041万元，王聪分得赃款66.632万元，刘桢彬分得赃款64.348万元，林书铖分得赃款32.674万元。 二、非法经营罪 2018年10月，金明日违反国家法律法规等有关规定，非法设立“锡安圣经学院”,被告人王林任院长，被告人汪中任行政院长，被告人吴秋雨任教务长，自2020年至2025年，未经许可利用信息网络非法销售涉宗教等内容的“课程包”,收取非法经营款200余万元。 至案发，被告人王林分得非法经营款42.7万元，汪中分得非法经营款14.1万元，吴秋雨分得非法经营款39.9万元。 认定上述事实的证据如下： 1.物证：扣押的手机、电脑等；2.书证：户籍信息、取缔决定书等；3.被害人陈述：*******等人的陈述；4.证人证言：*******等证人的证言；5.被告人供述和辩解：王林、高颖佳、尹会彬等人的供述和辩解；6.搜查、辨认等笔录：搜查 笔录、辨认笔录等；7.视听资料、电子数据：授课视频、电子检材报告、银行流水、微信、支付宝交易明细等。 本院认为，被告人王林、高颖佳、尹会彬、王聪、刘桢彬、 林书钺以非法占有为目的，虚构事实、隐瞒真相，骗取他人财物， 数额特别巨大，其行为触犯了《中华人民共和国刑法》第二百六 十六条，犯罪事实清楚，证据确实、充分，应当以诈骗罪追究其刑事责任。被告人王林、汪中、吴秋雨违反国家规定，实施严重扰乱市场秩序的非法经营行为，情节特别严重，其行为触犯了《中华人民共和国刑法》第二百二十五条第(四)项，犯罪事实清楚，证据确实、充分，应当以非法经营罪追究其刑事责任。被告人王林、高颖佳、尹会彬、王聪、刘桢彬、林书钺共同故意实施诈骗的犯罪行为，被告人王林、汪中、吴秋雨共同故意实施非法经营的犯罪行为，依照《中华人民共和国刑法》第二十五条第一款之规定，是共同犯罪。被告人王林在共同诈骗、非法经营犯罪活动中起主要作用，被告人高颖佳、尹会彬在共同诈骗犯罪活动中起主要作用，依照《中华人民共和国刑法》第二十六条第一款、第四款之规定，是主犯，应当按照其所参与的全部犯罪处罚；被告人王聪、刘桢彬、林书铖在共同诈骗犯罪活动中起次要作用，被告人汪中、吴秋雨在共同非法经营犯罪活动中起次要作用，依照《中华人民共和国刑法》第二十七条之规定，是从犯，应当从轻或者减轻处罚。被告人王林、高颖佳、尹会彬、刘桢彬、林书铖、汪中、吴秋雨归案后如实供述自己的罪行，依照《中华人民共和国刑法》第六十七条第三款之规定，系坦白，可以从轻处罚。被告人王林在判决宣告以前一人犯数罪，依照《中华人民共和国刑法》第六十九条之规定，应当数罪并罚。被告人汪中自愿认罪认罚，依照《中华人民共和国刑事诉讼法》第十五条之规定，可以从宽处理。根据《中华人民共和国刑事诉讼法》第一百七十六条之规定，提起公诉，请依法判处。 此致 广西壮族自治区北海市银海区人民法院 副检察长 潘远霞 检察官 叶发强 吴国成 李苑华 检察官助理 刘佳诚 2026年7月17日 PEOPLE’S PROCURATORATE OF YINHAI DISTRICT, BEIHAI CITY, GUANGXI ZHUANG AUTONOMOUS REGION [UNOFFICAL ENGLISH TRANSLATION] INDICTMENT 北银检刑诉〔2026〕Z1号 Defendant Wang Lin (王林), male, born on March 20, 1981, PRC Resident Identity Card No. …, of Han ethnicity, with a bachelor’s-level education; place of household registration: …; current residence: … On suspicion of the crime of illegally using information networks, he was placed under criminal detention by the Yinhai Branch of the Beihai Municipal Public Security Bureau on October 11, 2025. His arrest was approved by this Procuratorate on November 17, 2025, and was executed by the Yinhai Branch of the Beihai Municipal Public Security Bureau on the following day. Defendant Gao Yingjia (高颖佳), male, born on August 31, 1978, PRC Resident Identity Card No. …, of Han ethnicity, with a doctoral-level postgraduate education; place of household registration: …; current residence: … On suspicion of the crime of illegally using information networks, he was placed under criminal detention by the Yinhai Branch of the Beihai Municipal Public Security Bureau on October 11, 2025. His arrest was approved by this Procuratorate on November 17, 2025, and was executed by the Yinhai Branch of the Beihai Municipal Public Security Bureau on the following day. Defendant Yin Huibin (尹会彬), male, born on September 23, 1967, PRC Resident Identity Card No. …, of Han ethnicity, with a junior-college education; place of household registration: …; current residence: …. On suspicion of the crime of illegally using information networks, he was placed under criminal detention by the Yinhai Branch of the Beihai Municipal Public Security Bureau on October 11, 2025. His arrest was approved by this Procuratorate on November 17, 2025, and was executed by the Yinhai Branch of the Beihai Municipal Public Security Bureau on the following day. Defendant Wang Cong (王聪), female, born on October 11, 1982, PRC Resident Identity Card No. …, of Han ethnicity, with a bachelor’s-level education; place of household registration: …; current residence: … On suspicion of the crime of illegally using information networks, she was placed under criminal detention by the Yinhai Branch of the Beihai Municipal Public Security Bureau on October 12, 2025. Her arrest was approved by this Procuratorate on November 17, 2025, and was executed by the Yinhai Branch of the Beihai Municipal Public Security Bureau on the following day. Defendant Liu Zhenbin (刘桢彬), male, born on January 5, 1987, PRC Resident Identity Card No. …, of Han ethnicity, with a master’s-level postgraduate education; place of household registration: …; current residence: … On suspicion of the crime of illegally using information networks, he was placed under criminal detention by the Yinhai Branch of the Beihai Municipal Public Security Bureau on October 11, 2025. His arrest was approved by this Procuratorate on November 17, 2025, and was executed by the Yinhai Branch of the Beihai Municipal Public Security Bureau on the following day. Defendant Lin Shucheng (林书铖, formerly known as Lin Shuyang [林叔阳]), male, born on September 16, 1991, PRC Resident Identity Card No. …, of Han ethnicity, with a bachelor’s-level education; place of household registration: …; current residence: … On suspicion of the crime of illegally using information networks, he was placed under criminal detention by the Yinhai Branch of the Beihai Municipal Public Security Bureau on October 12, 2025. His arrest was approved by this Procuratorate on November 17, 2025, and was executed by the Yinhai Branch of the Beihai Municipal Public Security Bureau on the following day. Defendant Wang Zhong (汪中, formerly known as 汪忠), male, born on September 9, 1967, PRC Resident Identity Card No. …, of Han ethnicity, with a master’s-level postgraduate education; place of household registration: …; current residence: … On suspicion of the crime of illegally using information networks, he was placed under criminal detention by the Yinhai Branch of the Beihai Municipal Public Security Bureau on October 21, 2025. His arrest was approved by this Procuratorate on November 17, 2025, and was executed by the Yinhai Branch of the Beihai Municipal Public Security Bureau on the following day. Defendant Wu Qiuyu (吴秋雨), female, born on August 19, 1989, PRC Resident Identity Card No. …, of Han ethnicity, with a master’s-level postgraduate education; place of household registration and current residence: … On suspicion of the crime of illegally using information networks, she was placed under criminal detention by the Yinhai Branch of the Beihai Municipal Public Security Bureau on October 12, 2025. Her arrest was approved by this Procuratorate on November 17, 2025, and was executed by the Yinhai Branch of the Beihai Municipal Public Security Bureau on the following day. The investigation of this case was concluded by the Yinhai Branch of the Beihai Municipal Public Security Bureau, which transferred the case to this Procuratorate for examination for prosecution on June 18, 2026, on suspicion that defendants Wang Lin, Gao Yingjia, Yin Huibin, and the other five defendants had committed the crimes of fraud and illegal business operations. After accepting the case, this Procuratorate informed the defendants on June 19, 2026, of their right to retain defense counsel and of the possible legal consequences of pleading guilty and accepting punishment, interrogated the defendants in accordance with law, heard the opinions of defense counsel, and examined all case materials. Upon examination in accordance with law, the following facts have been ascertained: I. Crime of Fraud In 2007, Jin Mingri (金明日, handled in a separate case), without registering or filing with the relevant administrative authorities as required by the State’s regulations on religious affairs and without obtaining approval to lawfully conduct religious preaching within China, unlawfully established the “Beijing Zion Church” in Beijing. Defendants Wang Lin, Gao Yingjia, Yin Huibin, Wang Cong, Liu Zhenbin, Lin Shucheng, and others joined the church and jointly engaged in unlawful religious activities. On September 9, 2018, the “Beijing Zion Church” was banned pursuant to law by the Civil Affairs Bureau of Chaoyang District, Beijing. Thereafter, Jin Mingri, defendant Yin Huibin, and others successively moved to and resided in Beihai City, where they continued to conduct unlawful religious activities. Acting as pastors, defendants Wang Lin, Gao Yingjia, Yin Huibin, Wang Cong, Liu Zhenbin, and Lin Shucheng were respectively responsible for religious preaching affairs in the Yangtze River Delta pastoral region, the Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei pastoral region, the broader pastoral region outside the Yangtze River Delta and Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei, the Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei sub-region, the Qingdao pastoral region, and the Chengdu pastoral region. Although they knew that the church had been banned and that they lacked lawful qualifications to preach, the defendants nevertheless falsely held themselves out as qualified religious clergy and, acting as pastors, conducted unlawful preaching activities on the internet and offline in various locations, thereby fraudulently obtaining more than RMB 10 million in “offerings” from congregants. By the time the case was uncovered, defendant Wang Lin had received RMB 1,244,050 in criminal proceeds; Gao Yingjia, RMB 1,155,464; Yin Huibin, RMB 563,041; Wang Cong, RMB 666,320; Liu Zhenbin, RMB 643,480; and Lin Shucheng, RMB 326,740. II. Crime of Illegal Business Operations In October 2018, Jin Mingri, in violation of relevant State laws and regulations, unlawfully established the “Zion Bible College.” Defendant Wang Lin served as president, defendant Wang Zhong as administrative dean, and defendant Wu Qiuyu as academic dean. From 2020 through 2025, without authorization, they used information networks to unlawfully sell “course packages” containing religious and related content and collected more than RMB 2 million in proceeds from illegal business operations. By the time the case was uncovered, defendant Wang Lin had received RMB 427,000 in proceeds from illegal business operations; Wang Zhong, RMB 141,000; and Wu Qiuyu, RMB 399,000. The evidence establishing the foregoing facts includes: 1. Physical evidence: seized mobile phones, computers, and other items; 2. Documentary evidence: household registration information, the decision to ban the organization, and other documents; 3. Statements of victims: statements by … and others; 4. Witness testimony: testimony by … and other witnesses; 5. Statements and defenses of the defendants: statements and defenses by Wang Lin, Gao Yingjia, Yin Huibin, and others; 6. Records of searches, identifications, and other investigative acts: search records, identification records, and related records; and 7. Audio-visual materials and electronic data: lecture videos, electronic evidence examination reports, bank transaction records, and WeChat and Alipay transaction details. This Procuratorate finds that defendants Wang Lin, Gao Yingjia, Yin Huibin, Wang Cong, Liu Zhenbin, and Lin Shucheng, with the purpose of unlawful possession, fabricated facts, concealed the truth, and fraudulently obtained property from others, with the amount involved being especially huge. Their conduct violates Article 266 of the Criminal Law of the People’s Republic of China. The facts of the crimes are clear, and the evidence is reliable and sufficient; they shall therefore be held criminally liable for the crime of fraud. Defendants Wang Lin, Wang Zhong, and Wu Qiuyu, in violation of State regulations, engaged in illegal business operations that seriously disrupted market order, under especially serious circumstances. Their conduct violates Article 225(4) of the Criminal Law of the People’s Republic of China. The facts of the crimes are clear, and the evidence is reliable and sufficient; they shall therefore be held criminally liable for the crime of illegal business operations. Defendants Wang Lin, Gao Yingjia, Yin Huibin, Wang Cong, Liu Zhenbin, and Lin Shucheng jointly and intentionally committed the crime of fraud. Defendants Wang Lin, Wang Zhong, and Wu Qiuyu jointly and intentionally committed the crime of illegal business operations. Pursuant to Article 25(1) of the Criminal Law of the People’s Republic of China, these are joint crimes. Defendant Wang Lin played a principal role in the joint crimes of fraud and illegal business operations, and defendants Gao Yingjia and Yin Huibin played principal roles in the joint crime of fraud. Pursuant to Article 26(1) and (4) of the Criminal Law of the People’s Republic of China, they are principal offenders and shall be punished on the basis of all crimes in which they participated. Defendants Wang Cong, Liu Zhenbin, and Lin Shucheng played secondary roles in the joint crime of fraud, and defendants Wang Zhong and Wu Qiuyu played secondary roles in the joint crime of illegal business operations. Pursuant to Article 27 of the Criminal Law of the People’s Republic of China, they are accomplices and shall be given lighter or mitigated punishment. After being brought to justice, defendants Wang Lin, Gao Yingjia, Yin Huibin, Liu Zhenbin, Lin Shucheng, Wang Zhong, and Wu Qiuyu truthfully confessed their crimes. Pursuant to Article 67(3) of the Criminal Law of the People’s Republic of China, they have made truthful confessions and may be given lighter punishment. Where defendant Wang Lin has committed multiple crimes before the pronouncement of judgment, pursuant to Article 69 of the Criminal Law of the People’s Republic of China, a combined punishment for multiple crimes shall be imposed. Defendant Wang Zhong voluntarily pleaded guilty and accepted punishment. Pursuant to Article 15 of the Criminal Procedure Law of the People’s Republic of China, he may be treated leniently. Pursuant to Article 176 of the Criminal Procedure Law of the People’s Republic of China, this Procuratorate hereby institutes a public prosecution and respectfully requests that the Court adjudicate and impose sentence in accordance with law. To: People’s Court of Yinhai District, Beihai City, Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region Deputy Chief Procurator: Pan Yuanxia Procurators: Ye Faqiang Wu Guocheng Li Yuanhua Assistant Procurator: Liu Jiacheng July 17, 2026