悬吊耐受测试 Suspension tolerance test Model by @AC_ac003 Rope by @CK11230970 Office by @WANIMAL912 Photo by @whiteplace_1 #shibari# #kinbaku# #BDSMArt# #RopeBondage# #FetishPhotography#

今天开始陆续有朋友被暂停收益了，似乎每次发工资前都会有这么一波 不过一般来说，都可以通过申诉拿回来。快的一周慢的1个月。下面是一个通用申诉模板和一个我的模板，希望大家用不上（记得用英文）： 通用模板： 我恳请复核我的账号。 就我所知，我并未有意违反任何平台规则。 如果我的内容有被误解或断章取义的地方，我愿意澄清并做出调整。 我非常珍视这个账号，并承诺未来严格遵守平台准则。 恳请您重新审视我的情况。 我的版本： Hi X Creators Team, I am writing to respectfully request a reconsideration of the permanent suspension of my account @snail_9106 from the Creator Revenue Sharing program, related to Case CREATOR-145938. I fully respect X’s Creator Monetization Standards and understand the importance of maintaining a high-quality and compliant creator ecosystem. However, the suspension notice did not specify which content, behavior, or account activity caused my account to be found non-compliant. Because of that, I am unable to clearly identify the exact issue, but I have taken this matter seriously and carefully reviewed my profile, posts, replies, and account activity. To reduce any possible misunderstanding, I have removed or adjusted content and profile elements that could potentially be interpreted as promotional, repetitive, misleading, or not fully aligned with the standards. My account mainly focuses on English learning, AI tools for content creation, writing techniques, self-media growth, and creator-related discussions. My intention has always been to share useful, original, and non-harmful content with the X community. If there is any specific post, reply, profile element, or account activity that caused the suspension, I would sincerely appreciate clarification so I can correct it properly. I respectfully request one more manual review of my account and ask your team to reconsider my eligibility for the Creator Revenue Sharing program. Thank you for your time and consideration. Best regards, @snail_9106

转发提示词：风格人物+精神投射 by 虎小象 @hx831126 不是单纯的Pixar风格，有点Designer Toy 风格 让模型帮我加入了人物戏剧夸张的身形和表情「修长身形，大脚，块状的结构」 以此慢慢的 让模型延展其他人物。 提示词： A high-resolution vertical Pixar-style 3D character illustration. Main character: Salvador Dalí — depicted as a tall, slim, and slightly exaggerated Pixar-style 3D character. Wearing a classic blue shirt, yellow tie, high-waisted plaid trousers with suspenders, and leather shoes. His iconic long upturned mustache, slick black hair, sharply arched eyebrows, and slightly eccentric posture. Stands with chest out, one hand on hip, head tilted slightly back in his typical theatrical flair. Background: Flat, clean yellow background with subtle surface texture. Strong sunlight from top-left casts a distinct and enlarged shadow on the wall behind him. Key Concept – Shadow as spiritual projection: The shadow cast behind him does **not** mirror his body shape. Instead, it takes the form of one of his most iconic artworks — a surreal melted clock with long dripping arms, inspired by “The Persistence of Memory”. The melted clock shadow is positioned diagonally, starting from his shoulder, stretching wide and low across the yellow wall, surreal and fluid, yet unmistakably symbolic. This shadow is **Dalí’s legacy made visible** — a symbolic extension of his identity through time, dream, and visual distortion. Lighting & Rendering: Pixar-like rendering with detailed but stylized textures. Use subtle filmic grain, soft shadows, and warm color grading. Subtle sparkles or light speckles inside the shadow to evoke dreamlike texture. Typography (top-left corner): “Salvador Dalí” in minimalist black sans-serif font, “Dalí” bolded.

杭州 IP 被封传言后，我才看懂：Claude Code 真正值钱的不只是 Claude 最近抖音上突然开始传一件事：Claude Code 把杭州的 IP 大面积封了。视频里的字幕很重，评论区更热闹，有人说“阿里注册了二十多万个账号”，也有人说“Anthropic 把整个杭州都封掉了”。我看到这个消息的真实反应其实很直接：身边用 Claude Code 的人，最近确实普遍反馈更容易遇到风控和封禁。这个体感不是空穴来风。 但我也没有因此立刻跟着骂 Anthropic。因为同一时间，我自己这边的体验又很反差：Codex 最近重置了两次，但整体还是挺香。我现在主力用的是 Codex 这边的额度池，调度方便，量大管饱。对一个每天真要靠 AI 干活的人来说，这种稳定感和余量感，比“哪个模型参数更强”还要现实。 先把事实边界说清楚 查完以后，我觉得这个热点最容易被讲偏。情绪很足，证据没跟上。截至 2026 年 6 月 30 日，我没有查到 Anthropic 针对杭州发布过城市级封禁公告。中国大陆本来就不在 Claude 官方支持地区列表里，所以有人无法登录、账号被风控，和“整个杭州被封”不是一回事。这个边界必须先说清楚，否则后面所有判断都会变成情绪消费。 如果你已经遇到 account on hold，可以先做一件很具体的事：点 Request a review，同时发一封简短英文申诉邮件。重点不要写阴谋论，也不要长篇解释，只讲三件事：我是正常用户，主要用途是什么，没有故意违规，请求人工复核。 英文申诉模板 Subject: Account Suspension Appeal - [your registered email] Hello Claude Support Team, I am writing to respectfully appeal the suspension or account hold on my Claude account ([your registered email]). I use Claude primarily for [briefly describe your use, such as work, learning, or coding], and I have tried to follow Anthropic's Terms of Service and Usage Policy. I did not intentionally violate any rules, so this may have been triggered by mistake. If I accidentally violated any policy, it was unintentional. I rely on Claude for my daily tasks and would appreciate a review of my account. [Optional, if applicable] I am an active Pro subscriber, and I value this service. Could you please review my account and help me restore access? Thank you for your time and assistance. Best regards, [your name] 但我顺着这条传言查下去，发现了另一件确定的事，而且比“杭州有没有被封”更值得讲。阿里云百炼的官方帮助中心，已经有一篇标题就叫《Claude Code》的接入文档。它不仅写了安装方式，还直接给出配置：把 ANTHROPIC_BASE_URL 指向百炼的兼容接口，再配置 Claude Code 的模型映射。保存以后，终端里照样运行 claude，但回答问题的后端可以换掉。 这里也要防止另一种夸张。它不是 Anthropic 和阿里云共同宣布的合作，更不能说 Claude Code 官方投奔了某个模型。准确的说法是：阿里云百炼利用 Claude Code 支持的环境变量和 Anthropic 兼容接口，给出了一套官方接入方案。Claude Code 这个交互外壳还在，但模型供应商可以被换掉。能确认到这里，就已经足够有意思。 你真正舍不得的不是某个模型 很多人以为自己离不开 Claude，其实舍不得的是已经形成的工作方式：让工具进入项目目录，读取上下文，修改文件，执行命令，调用 Skills，最后由人检查改动。用久以后，人依赖的已经不是某个聊天窗口，而是一套“我提目标，AI 读现场，AI 动手，人来验收”的工作节奏。模型质量当然会直接影响结果。但当后端可以替换，当 Codex 这种工具也能接住很大一部分工作量时，Claude Code 的价值就不再只由 Claude 模型决定。它更像一个工作台，模型是工作台下面的发动机。 这也解释了为什么“封号”会引发这么大的焦虑。很多人把账号、模型和工作流绑成了一件事。一旦账号出问题，积累的提示词、项目习惯和自动化流程仿佛都要跟着报废。更稳妥的做法，是从一开始就把它们分开：项目资料留在自己的目录里，Skills 和规则用可读文件保存，关键流程保留人工确认，同时准备至少一个兼容模型或替代工具。内容选题、草稿、同步脚本、发布包、复盘记录，这些都应该是你自己的资产，不应该长在某个模型账号上。账号会重置，额度会变化，模型会轮换，但你的工作流不能每次跟着归零。 OPC 最怕的不是换模型 对于做一人公司的我来说，这件事尤其现实。OPC 要的是一个人也能持续交付，没有人能保证永远押中最强模型。今天用 Claude，明天用 Codex，之后还会有新的选择。供应商会调整地区、价格和政策，个人控制不了这些变化。我们能控制自己的项目文件、任务规则、上下文资产和验收标准。只要这些东西能迁移，换工具就只是换入口，不用重新造一辆车。 围着“杭州到底封了多少个 IP”吵下去，最后很可能只剩一场真假难辨的情绪消费。更实际的问题是：如果明天 Claude 真的不能用了，你现在这套工作方式还能不能继续运行？如果答案是否定的，那你积累的可能只是一个账号的使用熟练度，还没有形成自己的 AI 生产系统。 AI 时代最危险的，不是某个模型封了你，而是离开某个模型，你就不会工作了。 END 参考资料 阿里云百炼：Claude Code 接入文档 Claude 官方支持地区列表 #AI# #AIAgent# @grok