相对于墨子的“兼爱”,从实际效果看,杨朱的自私的“一毛不拔”更可能是有效的利他主义。
杨朱虽然“一毛不拔”但有明确的边界,也不拿天下奉养自己,互不侵犯,互不强求,表面上的自私,反而是最大的利他。
墨子的兼爱,听上去很美,很有爱心,但需要定义什么是“利他”,一旦落实到行动,变成组织,就可能变形了。
很大很大的课题,DAO一直得不到突破,很有意思的事情。表面上的和实际上的有时候不仅是两回事,甚至反过来。
Since many people are learning about effective altruism, it's worth learning about Mozi, the ancient Chinese philosopher who was surprisingly close to being a proto-effective-altruist (particularly the global-health-focused variety, not the AI-risk-focused variety).
He valued the twin goals of (i) universal love, loving everyone and not just yourself and people similar or close to you, and (ii) being efficient about how you use your limited resources to most effectively help people.
顯示更多