今天我因为还信用卡被96110 说有风险，要见面。 买车刷的刷了7w多 加上之前的欠款 昨天还了10w多 今天疯狂打我电话，说这笔款有风险要求跟我线下见面。我拒绝后，他说风险后果自己想清楚。 我从自己的农行卡还款至农行的信用卡。说这笔钱有风险。我真的无语了。

承认吧，绝大多数碳基脑瓜子也就 7B 参数。之所以看起来还能干活，拼的无非是碳基世界的“经验”和“资源”——翻译成黑话，就是 Skills、工具调用和 MCP。 偶尔能力不够，还得外挂一层 MTP ，专门预测领导想听什么。 更要命的是，不少人常年被奶头乐拿去做无监督微调，前额叶都快剪枝完了，最后成功量化成了 Q2。。。

今天联合国大会以164票赞成、1票反对、6票弃权通过「纠正地图」决议，鼓励各国在教育、机构和公共传播中，用2018年的「平等地球投影」（Equal Earth）替代长期充当世界底图的墨卡托投影（Mercator） 下图浅蓝色是墨卡托下被放大的轮廓，深蓝色是各国实际面积。格陵兰明显缩小；非洲、南美、澳大利亚按体量展开；欧洲和北美不再被极地拉伸垫高。 没想到之前学的地理被图片骗了这么久！！

昨天买了 MEGA 以后我就是超级奶爸了。 我发现我买车运气永远那么差，人家今天就收到运输了。我的还在等，杭州买的人太多了。 打算贴个蜡笔小新得车膜。

This hasn't been talked about much but it may be one of the most consequential revelations of the US's war on Iran: the fact that China has effectively replaced OPEC as the global price setter for oil. It isn't me saying it but Igor Sechin, CEO of Rosnef, the largest oil producer in Russia - itself a member of OPEC+ ( And Sechin isn't alone in saying so: many Western analysts - such as Javier Blas, Bloomberg's top energy analyst - are essentially saying the same thing (see How so? Well, China has demonstrated during the Iran war an extraordinary ability to simply walk away from the market and slash its oil imports by millions of barrels per day - during a months on end. At peak, they slashed imports by 5.5 million barrels per day, the equivalent of India's total consumption. They can, quite literally, switch an entire India's worth of demand on and off, at will. This is mainly because they have immense strategic oil reserves, estimated to stand at 1.4 billion barrels ( - 4 times bigger than the US's (the world's second largest inventory). In a nutshell, prices being, as everyone knows, set by supply and demand, China now controls the demand side in a bigger way than OPEC controls the supply side. So, as Sechin puts it, they now call the shots. All the more given that OPEC is weaker than it's ever been with the recent loss of the UAE, the largest producer ever to walk out. This is what effectively saved the world's economy during the Iran war: analyst after analyst predicted that the closure of Hormuz would make oil prices skyrocket to stratospheric levels, like $200-$300 a barrel ( However, Hormuz is still closed and prices sit at... $91 a barrel, after briefly peaking at around $110 in April ( China almost single-handedly made this happen with their flexibility on the demand side: what Hormuz made the world lose in supply, China basically cut in demand, which stabilized prices. Long story short, as the saying goes: "never let a good crisis go to waste." China used this one to effect a friendly takeover of the most powerful cartel on earth - without even joining it.

🚨普林斯顿教授刚刚警告，超级人工智能会产生新的封建主义。 普林斯顿政治学副教授、Compact 编辑 @GregoryConti19 昨天发了一段很有意思的判断： 如果超级智能真的到来，社会流动性可能会直接结束。 过去一个人还能靠能力、劳动和运气完成阶层跃迁。但在 ASI 时代，如果智能本身可以用算力购买，那么资本越多的人，就可以买更多 GPU、更多推理、更多 Agent，然后不断放大自己的资本优势。 最后竞争的核心可能不再是谁更聪明，而是谁拥有更多 Compute。 Conti 把它称为 pure incumbency，一个完全由在位者主导的世界。 他甚至认为，这会终结精英主义，并开启一种新的封建主义。 这其实和很多人对 ASI 的想象完全相反。 我们经常讲 AI 会把能力平权，一个普通人加 AI 就能拥有过去一个团队的生产力。 但问题在于，如果 100 美元的 AI 能让普通人增强 10 倍，那么拥有 10 亿美元的人为什么不能部署十万个这样的 Agent？ 当劳动和智力越来越不稀缺，真正稀缺的东西可能重新变成资本、算力、能源和基础设施。 Conti 在最近的文章里甚至进一步认为，如果人类努力和经济回报彻底脱钩，那么这套体系已经很难再被称为传统意义上的资本主义。 AI 到底会带来前所未有的阶层流动，还是把今天的赢家永久冻结在赢家的位置？ 这个问题可能比 AI 会不会抢工作重要得多。

我去，居然看到有人用AI生成了我最喜欢的大刘短篇科幻小说《山》，而且质量还不错，推荐观看。 而且居然是一个人手搓出来的！! ！AI真是大舞台啊，一个普通人也能整上两小时科幻大电影了。 --来自B站Up主“野生锅导演”

抛开孙割人品景甜错就错在太贪婪了，遇到对手了， 如果不是临时要5000万美金， 以38岁断水断电拉闸的景甜配一毛不拔居然舍得拔几千万彩礼的孙割，景甜算是赚了。

抛开孙割人品景甜错就错在太贪婪了，遇到对手了， 如果不是临时要5000万美金， 以38岁断水断电拉闸的景甜配一毛不拔居然舍得拔几千万彩礼的孙割，景甜算是赚了。