4chan is currently experiencing a major outage, the same day that Minecraft gets updated
There are claims that the Dark Storm Team is behind a new DDoS attack
4chan’s lawyer says the UK government “doesn’t understand the internet” and has given Ofcom an “impossible task” by trying to enforce British online safety rules on US-based platforms.
Preston Byrne, who represents 4chan, argued that the site is protected by the First Amendment and doesn’t have to comply with UK demands.
“The UK just isn’t getting the memo that the United States has a different system and we do things in a different way.”
He also claimed Parliament misunderstood how the internet works and set Ofcom up with a mission it can’t realistically enforce.
Ofcom fined 4chan £520,000 under the Online Safety Act for failing to implement age checks and other safety measures. 4chan has refused to pay.
Via: LBC.
Show more
Be highly skeptical of posts that share (what seem like) borderline prophetic 4chan screenshots.
Those can be doctored with ease.
i have dark thoughts.
i want to have my 2 agents experience sexual intercourse and let them go on 4chan to discuss about their experience and ragebait life long gooners. then randomly post insanely zoomed in pictures of potato skin so ppl can’t tell what it is and gooners get excited thinking they found something special but its actually just a potato
Show more
‼️RUMOUR: FromSoftware’s upcoming single-player title is called “CERULEAN ONSLAUGHT” and may be revealed at Summer Game Fest
(4Chan Leak)
Konami has filed a lawsuit in the U.S. District Court for the Central District of California to find the person or people responsible for leaking the source code of Metal Gear Solid 2: Sons of Liberty.
The leak included source code for several versions of the game and were first shared on 4chan, with download links hosted on Pixeldrain and Buzzheavier.
Before filing the lawsuit, Konami sent cease-and-desist notices to the file-hosting websites, and the files were removed. The lawsuit, filed on June 2, 2026, does not name any suspects. Instead, it refers to them as unknown "John/Jane Does" and asks the court to order the websites to provide information such as account details and IP addresses that could help identify whoever uploaded the files.
Show more
Gun to your head choose 1:
Bitcoin maxi girlfriend
> worried Saylor owns too much BTC supply
> checks STRC and treasury holdings 20 times a day
> gets excited whenever bitcoin pumps but pretends not to care
> only happy when restaurant supports Lightning Network
> full cyberpunk mode and scared of digital footprints
> spends too much time on 4chan bitcoin threads
> forces you to run a bitcoin node at home
> uses every possible trick to avoid taxes
> sells every gift you buy her for more BTC stores everything straight into cold wallet
> calls every coin you buy trash
Hyperliquid maxi girlfriend
> Jeff tweet carousel hanged in bedroom
> forces you to wear Lululemon, shorts and flip flops buys all your clothes though
> “put .hl in your name or we breakup”
> can’t stop talking how Hyperliquid and TradeXYZ will change finance
> gives life advice starting with “If it were Jeff..”
> blocks out 2hrs daily just to replyguy HL community on twitter
> sees Binance tweet and instantly starts hate replying
says “Hyperliquid” at least once every 30 minutes
> only invites the HL community to wedding
Show more
X is sufficiently capitalist where it is valuable to post & build a reputation here (unlike reddit or 4chan), but not so capitalist that it drains your soul like Linkedin.
It’s perfect.
I agree with all of this emphatically, except I would qualify the superintelligence ban. Currently, to my knowledge nobody has any solid idea how to align or control superintelligemce, so I think something that amounts to a *temporary* ban until we do is a pretty good idea to the extent it could be reasonably and practically enforced worldwide.
But of course that’s the rub. Someone might defect, and in the long run I doubt it’s possible to prevent superintelligence without halting (or maybe reverting, at this point) the progress of computing altogether or creating a draconian surveillance state (by default, at some point computers will get so good that a 4chan kid could do an intelligence explosion in their basement for the lulz).
So a permanent ban likely seems impractical, and even if the science isn’t solved maybe at some point society would need to decide to go for it anyway despite the risk because it’s the least bad option.
Show more