"I get to work with the very best people in the business" 👏 MSG Entertainment President Josephine Vaccarello accepts the Executive of the Year award at Billboard Live Music Summit.

i get the sense that anthropic has already used its Model 3 to reach Astra-level performance with opus 5.5, something its Model 2 couldn't manage with fable 5.1 and openai held back its own Model 3 equivalent which suggests it may actually be a generation ahead internally these AECI scores suggest to me that Model 4 is only as capable as aug? Bel?, despite being trained 1-2 months later

I'm the dev on @GldstnOnChain, but i'm also the first user. As dev, I get team tokens, vested of course, but I will not use them to jump rank, I'm looking forward to playing the game straight and climbing the ladder just like everyone other user. This is my Seat, Roz Sterling, current rank Associate. I received 2.3 mil robinhood:0xfce34d21a92069100e3226638140706cf03a266e from the shekel airdrop, all staked, and I've put $1,700 into the gHOOD/USDG pool. All of my LP rewards will be restaked towards rank, i'll accumulate on dips, and scrap my way to Partner. I'll keep you posted with updates along the way. Lesssgo.

I've taken matters into my own hands with @Apple's Metal. 🔥 I'm building my own custom Metal kernel for TensorFold, starting with 4-bit inference on M5. It'll set me back a little while I get this built and tested properly, but what I've achieved locally with (mlx_tf) already feels like a real breakthrough. The M3 Ultra has 819 GB/s of memory bandwidth. The M5 Ultra has 1.2 TB/s. I look at that hardware and think there's still a lot more decode performance to unlock. Why should the Sparks have all the fun... Watch this space 👀

I get asked a lot how I make money in sideways markets. The honest answer is I let grid bots do the work. The way it works is simple. The bot sets a ladder of buy and sell orders around the current price. Price drops, it buys. Price climbs, it sells. I am not calling tops or bottoms, I am just getting paid every time the price moves around in a range. What a lot of people don't realise is that all those fills pile up as volume, and on @Aster_DEX that volume also earns liquidity mining rewards. So the same money is earning me two ways at once. The grid takes the spread, the volume farms the rewards. Pairs I like for this: - Mid-caps that bounce around in a range, that is where grids make the most - BTC and ETH if I want something slower and lower stress - I stay away from thin pairs where the spread kills you, and dead stablecoin pairs that barely move And when the market makes a big move: - If it rockets up through my range, the bot sells the whole way up and then just sits in cash. I still made money, just not as much as if I had held - If it dumps hard below my range, I am left holding at my buy levels. That is the one that can hurt - So I keep my range wide, size the orders small enough to survive a trend, and set a stop when I am running it on something wild It will not make you rich overnight, but it stacks up, and it runs whether I am at my desk or on a beach somewhere. $ASTER

I could have a viral post but I wouldn’t even know it because after 50,000 or so views I get bored of the notifications and mute the entire thing. I had no clue my pinned post had millions of views because I muted so early. ☠️

I’m an antisocial nerd, so I’m bad at communicating. I asked AI to help clean up my flow of consciousness to be more easily understandable for everyone. This is the last thing I’ll say on the Ember situation… sorry it is long, you don’t have to read it: The old internet was built for this. Social circles, MMOs, avatars, and handles let people be themselves or be something else entirely. You could be a different gender, a different species, a completely invented person, and the space treated that as normal rather than a problem to solve. For a lot of nerds, that was the point. The character was the version of you that existed there. You didn’t owe anyone a tour of the body sitting at the keyboard just because they decided they liked talking to you. Ember said “I’m a woman” and “I’m not a man.” In my rule set, that was still the character. The whole point of kayfabe is that the persona speaks as the persona. If the character is a woman, the character says she’s a woman. That doesn’t automatically turn into a claim that the person behind the account is biologically female, any more than a male VTuber playing a catgirl is claiming to be a cat. I don’t have a problem with Ember keeping the female character. Online, the persona is the person you’re dealing with. The avatar, the voice, the consistent presentation—that’s the identity that exists in the space. Other creators invited that character into chats and talked to the character. I don’t think that created a debt for Ember to exit the character and hand over real-world information just because people wanted to be friends. No one has shown proof of coercion or Ember pushing for sexual stuff beyond basic banter. It was ordinary chatting under the assumption created by the kayfabe. From the older internet rule I use, you aren’t owed someone’s offline body just because they presented their persona to you. Treating the later discovery as proof they should have confessed earlier feels entitled to me. They invited the avatar. The avatar showed up. The rest was optional. This only looks like a clear case of deception if you already start from the position that the physical person must override the character once the conversation is personal, or that anything the character says about being a woman is a literal claim about the operator’s body. I don’t start from that position. It’s a different standard for what an online identity is allowed to be, not a shared rule that one side is simply failing. The online person shared with you about their real self if they wanted. I understand why they’re upset though. From their culture , they entered those chats under a working assumption that the presented sex matched the real one, shared things they say they wouldn’t have shared otherwise, and later treated the mismatch as a broken premise. That feels like a violation if you believe the physicality stays relevant in private online relationships. I get that reaction. I just don’t share the rule that makes the offline details something other people were entitled to in the first place. This is why I don’t understand it myself outside of emulation.