.@teddyswims' “Lose Control” makes history this week by spending a 100th total week on the #Hot100#, becoming the first song in history to reach the milestone. 📈 Take a look at an updated list of the longest-charting songs in history, and tap here for details:

.@teddyswims makes history this week, as “Lose Control” ties the all-time record as the longest-charting song in history. 📈 The song spends a 91st total week on the chart, tying Glass Animals’ “Heat Waves” for the most weeks spent on the chart ever. Details:

【Too Hot to Resist】Episode 1: Three Couples Spark Flying 💥 (25:30mins) After a long time apart, we finally reunited with J&B again! Since our Phuket couples trip, it’s been ages since we last saw them. This time, we arranged for J&B to join us together with David & Elaine — bringing new lovers and old flames together under one roof. It felt both exciting and nostalgic. J&B were once intimately close with us, almost like real lovers. Everyone truly cared for each other. Later, they stepped away from the scene due to busy work schedules. Meanwhile, we’ve grown much closer and more in sync with David & Elaine recently. We were all thrilled to finally gather all six of us together and curious about what kind of sparks would fly 💥 We booked a beautiful two-story house for the night. Everyone chilled, drank, and chatted. Elaine sat on the far left, followed by Sam, B, David, me, and then J. The conversation flowed freely and got increasingly flirty, but the real fun began with deeper connections… This game wasn’t just about warming up — it was about discovering who desired who the most. When three couples start swapping, that special, electric tension appears. The women tended to be more selective and passive at first, subtly showing their level of interest and affection toward each person before choosing who they wanted to connect with first. Who will develop strong feelings for whom tonight? And who will be the first to lose control and give in to their desires? —————————————— 【热情难挡】第一集 三对情侣夫妻换出火花💥（25:30分钟） 暌违已久，终于再次见到 J&B 这对情侣！ 自从Phuket那次情侣之旅后，我们已经很久没见了。这次特别安排了 J&B 与 David、Elaine 一起聚会，新欢与旧爱同聚一堂，感觉既刺激又充满期待。 J&B 曾经和我们亲密如恋人，大家都深爱着彼此。后来因为工作太忙，他们暂时离开了这个圈子。而最近我们和 David & Elaine 越来越合拍，关系也日渐亲密。这次能四人再加上 J&B 六人齐聚，真的非常开心，也十分期待会碰撞出什么样的火花💥 我们包下了一间两层楼的房子，晚上大家一起喝酒聊天。Elaine 坐在最左边，接着是 Sam、B、David、我，然后是 J，氛围轻松又暧昧。我们聊了很多，但最精彩的部分，当然还是之后更深层次的连接…… 这次的游戏不只是热身，更重要的是让大家感受「谁更喜欢自己」。当三对同时交换时，那种奇妙又紧张的感觉特别强烈。女生们相对被动，会先选择自己最想连接的对象，在过程中也自然流露出对对方的喜爱程度，慢慢找到今晚心动的性爱对象。 究竟谁会对谁产生强烈的爱意？ 谁又会最先忍不住呢？

Bari Weiss may be losing control of CBS News. According to Puck News today, Paramount-Skydance is in informal talks to strip her of day-to-day control over 60 Minutes, CBS Evening News, and CBS Mornings. CNN CEO Mark Thompson is being considered to take over. David Ellison met with him in recent days. Five months ago, Weiss killed Sharyn Alfonsi’s 60 Minutes piece on CECOT — the El Salvador prison where the Trump administration sends deportees. Alfonsi’s email to staffers: “It is factually correct. Pulling it now is not an editorial decision. It is a political one.” Weiss reportedly threatened to sue Alfonsi over the dispute. Yesterday Anderson Cooper left 60 Minutes. He had been on Weiss’s short list to anchor the Evening News. He turned the anchor job down. Then he declined to renew his 60 Minutes contract. Paramount’s official statement today: “Bari has the full support of Paramount and David Ellison. Reports suggesting otherwise are inaccurate.” Under the proposed restructure, Weiss wouldn’t be fired. She’d keep “broad editorial influence.” She’d just lose the daily TV control. The face changes. The CECOT story stays buried.

How did Jeff Bezos build not just his physique, but a sharper, more disciplined personal brand in his 60s? His transformation signals control, longevity, and elite performance, achieved not through heavy lifting but low-impact training, a method also used by Tom Cruise and Gerard Butler. This approach prioritizes strength, mobility, recovery, and longevity. As we age, recovery slows, inflammation rises, tissues lose elasticity, and sleep declines. High-impact training accelerates this decay. Low-impact training counters it by stressing muscles while protecting joints. Core principle: train hard on muscles, easy on joints.Swap deadlifts for carries, sprints for sled pushes, HIIT for incline walks. It’s not low intensity. It means controlled tempo, joint-safe mechanics, eccentric focus, and minimal inflammation. The goal is consistency without breakdown. Bezos trains 5–6 days a week: strength, cardio, and recovery sessions, all guided by sleep and recovery data. He avoids running, favoring rucking, incline walking, and rowing for joint-friendly conditioning. He tracks sleep, HRV, and recovery, prioritizing rest above all. Strength gains come from recovery, not just effort. Sleep drives performance: growth hormone, testosterone, and muscle repair peak during deep and REM sleep. Poor sleep shifts the body into stress mode, accelerating decline. The strategy is simple: sustainable training + optimized recovery = long-term performance and brand signal. Notably, Elon Musk once publicly mocked Bezos’s earlier physique during their rivalry between SpaceX and Blue Origin. The later transformation flipped that narrative and turned a moment of ridicule into a signal of discipline, evolution, and personal brand power.

Jensen Huang is angry and the numbers explain exactly why (Save this). This clip is his response to two specific arguments that have been used to justify restricting Nvidia's access to global markets and he is not being diplomatic about either of them. The first argument he calls stupid is that GPUs are comparable to atomic bombs. His rebuttal is that there are a billion people using Nvidia GPUs right now, they are inside every medical imaging system on the planet, they were used in the CT scan he got the day before this interview, and he advocates them to his own family. You cannot make that statement about atomic bombs, and the moment you accept the analogy, Huang says, you cannot finish any coherent thought that follows from it. The second argument he calls completely ridiculous: that American companies should not compete internationally because they will lose anyway. His response is the one that landed, "If you guys all apply that same philosophy, why wake up in the morning?" It sounds like a motivational line, but it is actually a specific policy argument that maps onto a catastrophic real-world outcome that has already partially occurred. Nvidia's share of the AI accelerator market in China went from 95% to zero. Because US export controls made it impossible for Nvidia to sell, and by the time Washington partially reversed course and approved H200 exports, Beijing had already launched security investigations into those chips, DeepSeek had announced a pivot to Huawei hardware, and Chinese customers had begun rebuilding their pipelines around domestic alternatives. China represents what Huang called a $50 billion market opportunity. Nvidia has now walked away from $15 billion in lost sales, took a $5.5 billion inventory write-down in a single quarter when the H20 ban hit, and projected an $8 billion revenue loss in the subsequent quarter, all while the market it was excluded from accelerated its own chip ecosystem in direct response to being cut off. Huang's point is not that national security does not matter. His point is that the defeatist logic, "you're going to lose it anyway, so why compete" is self-fulfilling in a way that pure restriction advocates never account for. Every restriction that pushes China toward technological self-reliance is a restriction that permanently reduces American leverage, permanently shrinks American market opportunity, and permanently accelerates the development of the exact domestic alternatives the policy was meant to prevent. And Nvidia, with a $5.4 trillion market cap and zero percent China revenue, is the most visible proof of what that trade-off actually costs.

A Russian biophysicist spent 30 years proving that shining red light on a cell could double its energy, and almost nobody believed her until a tech billionaire named Bryan Johnson made her work the most searched biohack on the internet. Her name was Tiina Karu. She worked in a Moscow lab through the 1980s and 1990s, and the discovery she defended for decades sat in journals nobody read while the rest of medicine ignored her. The whole thing started by accident. In 1967, a Hungarian doctor named Endre Mester was trying to use a new device called a laser to burn tumors out of mice. His laser was broken. It did not have enough power to burn anything. He used it anyway. The mice grew their hair back faster than the control group. Their wounds healed faster too. He had no idea why. Tiina Karu picked up his work and asked the question that mattered. Why does this happen. She ran experiments for 20 years. Different wavelengths. Different doses. Measuring what happens inside the cell when red light hits it. The answer she landed on was almost too specific to be true. The thing in your body that responds to red light is one enzyme. Cytochrome c oxidase. It sits inside your mitochondria. Mitochondria are the part of your cell that makes energy. They take oxygen and food and turn it into a molecule called ATP, which is the fuel your cells run on. Your body makes 40 to 70 kilograms of ATP every single day just to keep you alive. If your mitochondria slow down, you age faster, heal slower, lose hair, lose muscle, and get inflamed easier. Cytochrome c oxidase does most of the work. It contains copper and iron atoms. Those atoms happen to absorb light at very specific colors. Red light at 630 to 670 nanometers. Near-infrared light at 810 to 850 nanometers. Other colors do almost nothing. Blue does not work. Green does not work. The biology is locked to those two windows because that is what the metal inside the enzyme can physically catch. When a red photon hits that enzyme, three things happen. The enzyme runs faster. ATP production jumps 30 to 40% within minutes. Nitric oxide gets released. Blood vessels widen. More oxygen and nutrients flow in. A small stress signal goes off inside the cell that tells it to repair itself. The same signal it gets after exercise. Red light is not adding anything to the cell. It is just unlocking work the cell was already trying to do. For 30 years almost nobody outside her field cared. Red light therapy lived inside dental clinics for mouth ulcers and physical therapy offices for tendonitis. Medical schools did not teach it. The science sat in obscure journals. Then the evidence started piling up. A 2024 review of 18 trials confirmed red light speeds up wound healing. Another 2024 review found it lowered inflammation markers by 38% over 4 weeks. Athletes using red light before training had 45% less muscle soreness the next day. Seven separate trials on hair loss showed visible regrowth in every single one. A 2024 study found 15 minutes of red light before a meal cut blood sugar spikes by 27.7%. In March 2026, Nature published a 4,000 word feature on red light therapy. The most respected scientific journal on Earth officially admitted there was real biology under the hype. That was the moment the field crossed from fringe to mainstream. Bryan Johnson is the reason the average person now knows any of this exists. He uses a red light cap on his scalp for 6 minutes daily and a full-body panel three times a week. He posted his hair regrowth photos and his skin scans, and the algorithm did the rest. Red light masks went from biohacker forums to Sephora shelves in two years. Tiina Karu died in 2019. She did not live to see Nature validate her. She did not live to see a billionaire turn the enzyme she identified into a billion dollar industry. Every red light mask, panel, cap, and bed on the planet right now is just a way to deliver the photons she proved mattered. The wavelengths were always there. The enzyme was always there. The biology was always real. It just took a Hungarian doctor with a broken laser, a Russian scientist nobody listened to, and one tech billionaire willing to stand in front of a glowing panel for the world to finally pay attention.