SEO question: how do tools like speedyindex.com force Googlebot Mobile to crawl a URL without using Search Console?
It doesn't seem to be backlinks or the Indexing API & my tests to capture referrers etc didn't find anything.
I'll make a free and OSS tool if I figure it out!
SEO earns a high position in a list of links; GEO earns a citation inside an AI-generated answer. The surfaces differ — conversational queries, zero-click answers, different measurement — but the underlying requirement is nearly identical: readable text, clear structure, disambiguated entities, and stable URLs. One workflow satisfies both, and podcasts hold a rare advantage: starting from zero text means a single conversion (episode → structured page) covers SEO and GEO in one move, with no legacy to untangle. Measure SEO in Search Console; measure GEO by AI-badged referrals and the questions agents ask your catalog.
SEO in 2026 isn't about ranking. It's about getting cited by AI.
68% of Google searches now end without a click. When an AI Overview shows up, organic CTR drops around 60%. But brands cited inside the AI answer get +35% CTR.
What works now:
🔹 Front-load your answers. 44.2% of ChatGPT citations come from the first 30% of a document. Put a direct answer within 40 to 60 words, right after a question-form heading.
🔹 Drop CSR-only sites. GPTBot, ClaudeBot, and Perplexity don't run JavaScript. If your content is client-side rendered, AI search can't see it. Use SSR.
🔹 Write self-contained paragraphs. AI search splits pages into passages, so each paragraph has to make sense on its own. Keyword density is dead.
🔹 Name your brand in third person. "[Brand] does X" beats "we do X." AI has to identify the subject to cite you.
🔹 Brand mentions beat backlinks. Web mentions correlate 3x stronger with AI visibility than backlinks. 82% of AI citations come from earned media.
🔹 Go long-tail. 94.74% of keywords get 10 or fewer monthly searches. A wide set of clear-intent long-tail terms beats chasing high-volume heads.
🔹 Use hub-and-spoke. One pillar page plus 8 to 20 interlinked supporting articles beats a single 5,000-word guide.
The fight isn't for page 1 of Google anymore. It's for a spot inside the AI answer.
Has anybody used my SEO skill/CLI for real work?
Trying to decide how useful it is, whether it needs to be more simple, go deeper, if it has bugs, etc.
I still use it a lot but am leaning to simple single-purpose tools for most of my work now.