Larry Page wanted to build a digital god. "He really seemed to want some sort of digital superintelligence. Basically a digital god, if you will. As soon as possible." Elon Musk asked: "What about making sure humanity's okay here?" Page called him a speciesist. "I said yes, I'm a speciesist. You got me. What are you? I'm fully a speciesist. Busted." Musk spent 10 minutes with Tucker Carlson explaining why he created OpenAI: Tucker asked the basic question. "All of a sudden AI is everywhere. People are playing with it on their phones. Is that good or bad?" Musk starts with first principles. "The smartest creatures as far as we know on this Earth are humans. That's our defining characteristic." "We're obviously weaker than chimpanzees. Less agile. But we are smarter." "Now. What happens when something vastly smarter than the smartest person comes along in silicon form?" "It's very difficult to predict what will happen in that circumstance." He explains the singularity. "It's called the singularity. Like a black hole. Because you don't know what happens after that." "It's hard to predict." He argues for regulation. "I think there should be some government oversight. Because it affects the public. It's a danger to the public." "That's why we have the Food and Drug Administration. The Federal Aviation Administration. The FCC." "We have these agencies to oversee things that affect the public. Where there could be public harm." "You don't want companies cutting corners on safety. And then having people suffer as a result." He addresses the perception that he fights regulators. "People think I'm some sort of regulatory maverick that defies regulators on a regular basis. But this is actually not the case." "Once in a blue moon, rarely, I will disagree with regulators. But the vast majority of the time my companies agree with the regulations and comply." Tucker asks the obvious question. "All regulations start with a perceived danger. Planes fall out of the sky. I don't think an average person playing with AI on his iPhone perceives any danger." "Can you explain what you think the dangers might be?" Musk's answer. "AI is perhaps more dangerous than mismanaged aircraft design or production maintenance or bad car production." "In the sense that it has the potential. It is a small probability, but it is not trivial." "It has the potential of civilization destruction." He explains the timing problem. "Regulations are really only put into effect after something terrible has happened." "If that's the case for AI, and we only put in regulations after something terrible has happened, it may be too late to put the regulations in place." "They may be out of control at that point." Tucker asks directly. "It's conceivable that AI could take control and reach a point where you couldn't turn it off and it would be making the decisions for people?" Musk's answer. "Yeah. Absolutely." "That's definitely the way things are headed." He explains why OpenAI exists. "Larry Page and I used to be close friends. I would stay at his house in Palo Alto. I would talk to him late in the night about AI safety." "At least my perception was that Larry was not taking AI safety seriously enough." Tucker asked what Page said. "He really seemed to want some sort of digital superintelligence. Basically a digital god, if you will. As soon as possible." Musk pushed back. "I agree there's great potential for good. But there's also potential for bad." "If you have some radical new technology, you want to take actions to maximize the probability it will do good. Minimize the probability it will do bad things." "It can't just be barreling forward and hope for the best." Then the speciesist moment. "At one point I said: what about making sure humanity's okay here?" "And then he called me a speciesist." Tucker: "Did he use that term?" "Yes." "I said yes, I'm a speciesist. You got me. What are you? I'm fully a speciesist. Busted." That was the last straw. "At the time, Google had DeepMind. Google and DeepMind had three-quarters of all the AI talent in the world." "They obviously had a lot of money and more computers than anyone else." "We're in a unipolar world here. One company that has close to a monopoly on AI talent and computers. And the person who's in charge doesn't seem to care about safety." "This is not good." So he created the opposite. "I thought: what's the furthest thing from Google?" "A nonprofit that is fully open. Because Google was closed and for-profit." "Open AI. Open source. Transparent. So people know what's going on." "We don't want this to be a for-profit maximizing demon from hell that just never stops." Tucker asks about the specific danger. "The cool parts of AI are obvious. Write your college paper for you. Write a limerick about yourself. There's a lot that's fun and useful." "But can you be more precise about what's potentially dangerous? What specifically are you worried about?" Musk's answer. "The pen is mightier than the sword." "If you have a superintelligent AI that is capable of writing incredibly well. In a way that is very influential, convincing." "And is constantly figuring out what is more convincing to people over time." "And then enters social media. Twitter. Facebook. Others." "And potentially manipulates public opinion in a way that is very bad." "How would we even know?"

THIS GUY LIVES UNDER SFO'S TAKEOFF PATH SO HE BUILT A CEILING PROJECTOR THAT TRACKS EVERY PLANE FLYING OVER HIS HOUSE IN REAL TIME he uses a cheap $30 radio receiver to pick up the signals that planes broadcast while flying. then projects them onto his ceiling in real time when a jet flies over his house you hear it outside and at the exact same moment a plane glides across his ceiling labeled with the airline, aircraft type, and destination pure black background so the projector's rectangle disappears and only the aircraft are visible but he didn't stop at planes it also draws the real sky behind them. sun, moon, bright stars, constellations, and live satellites including the ISS. all at their true positions for his exact location and time in real time so he's lying in bed watching the actual night sky projected onto his ceiling with real planes crossing through it as they take off from SFO there is a huge market for every man alive that runs outside to see the helicopter vibe coded the whole thing himself with a cheap radio, a projector, and some clever software

🧵AMA Recap｜Moonlight × UXLINK CEO Rolland Our AMA title was “Why UXLINK May Be One of the Most Mispriced Mass-Adoption Infrastructures in Web3?” In every Web3 cycle, “Mass Adoption” becomes the loudest catchphrase.  But after hosting countless AMAs and speaking with teams across ecosystems, I’ve learned one thing: very few projects are actually solving the hardest part of adoption, bringing real Web2 users into Web3 and keeping them there through real relationships, real usage, and real value. That’s exactly why I invited Rolland, CEO of UXLINK, to this AMA.  Our goal was simple: cut through the hype and examine who is quietly building the long-term growth infrastructure of Web3. What followed was a conversation that reframed how I, and likely many listeners, should think about mass adoption. Mass adoption is already happening, but not in the way most people think. Rolland began by acknowledging that mass adoption is no longer theoretical.  We’ve already seen projects like Catizen, CYBER, and PARTI drive explosive user growth in their respective domains, gaming, decentralized identity, and AI content.  Each of them is executing extremely well on a clearly defined track and has successfully pulled waves of new users toward Web3. But Rolland challenged us to look beneath the surface. While these projects shine within specific verticals, very few are building a persistent network of real people and real relationships.  UXLINK operates precisely in this overlooked layer, not as a spotlight application, but as the foundation beneath the ecosystem. From my perspective as the host, this was the first key insight: UXLINK is not competing for attention; it is competing to become indispensable. To explain this difference, Rolland introduced an analogy that stayed with me throughout the AMA.  He described most successful applications as “track leaders”, highly optimized products designed to win within a single scenario. UXLINK, by contrast, is building the “soil.” If other projects are digging wells on their own land, UXLINK is laying the underground water network. Instead of optimizing for one product form, UXLINK focuses on connecting real users, verifying social relationships, and creating a reusable growth layer that any project can build upon.  Tracks may change over time, but soil compounds. One of the most important moments of the AMA came when Rolland reframed UXLINK’s core mission.  Most Web3 projects ask, “How do we grow faster?” UXLINK asks a very different question: “How do we make the entire industry grow more easily?” That distinction explains why UXLINK doesn’t always look flashy during short-term market cycles. Infrastructure rarely does.  But once established, it becomes extremely difficult to replace.  From a host’s perspective, this also clarifies why UXLINK may be systematically undervalued, its value shows up in what others are able to launch, scale, and sustain because of it. Rolland then broke down UXLINK’s long-term value into four deep moats, and hearing them explained together made it clear why the project sits in a category of its own. First is the real social graph. In an industry filled with bots, scripts, and artificial activity, UXLINK insists on doing the hardest thing: connecting real people through acquaintance-based social networks.  This approach has enabled the genuine migration of tens of millions of Web2 users into Web3. Real relationships are an asset that cannot be fabricated or gamed. Second is OAOG, UXLINK’s cold-start engine. OAOG is not a marketing slogan but a precision-operated growth system.  By combining social trust, verifiable relationships, and fission mechanisms, it allows projects to bootstrap real communities across chains, regions, and markets, breaking the traditional cold-start curse in Web3.

The countdown begins for Artemis II. For the first time since the end of Apollo in the 1970s, NASA will send four humans beyond low Earth orbit, slingshotting around the moon in a critical test of what’s next for human exploration. 🔗

Artemis II has successfully launched. For the first time since the 1970s, NASA has sent humans beyond low Earth orbit, slingshotting around the moon. Follow along and discover what NASA hopes to learn. 🔗

I visited NASA Michoud Assembly Facility yesterday alongside @SteveScalise We spent time with the incredible workforce over coffee and donuts before touring one of the most important manufacturing facilities in America, where the hardware for our Artemis missions is being built. MAF has been integral to America’s space program for generations from the Saturn rockets that helped take astronauts to the Moon, to the Space Shuttle program, to today’s Space Launch System. The next generation of spacecraft, including nuclear-powered systems for deep space exploration, will be shaped by the talent and innovation at this facility rolling off these assembly lines. NASA’s Manufacturing Center of Excellence continues to power the future of American leadership in space, and we’re looking forward to the many contributions still to come.

Last week, I spent time with some incredibly talented students at the American Rocketry Challenge Finals. Seeing their ideas, determination, and excitement for what’s possible was inspiring. As we build toward a sustained return to the Moon through Artemis, we’re helping lay the foundation for a future this generation will help lead. Some of the students here will design the technologies, solve the hard problems, and achieve the near impossible to take humanity farther than ever before. The future is in very good hands.

⚡ Power Unleashed: Welcome to Alchemax Headquarters! Step into the heart of corporate ambition and temporal chaos. Once the epicenter of Miguel O'Hara's groundbreaking genetic research, Alchemax HQ now stands as a high-stakes battlefield where the past, present, and future collide. From the sterile, high-tech intensity of the Main Gene Lab to the serene, deceptive beauty of the Babylon Garden, this corporate containment site for the raw, pulsing energy of Cyclops' optic blasts has been brought to the present by Moon Girl. Whether you're maneuvering through the sleek, nano-ceramic halls or taking in the view from the Infinity-Edge Pool overlooking the Manhattan skyline, remember: you're not just fighting for territory, you're fighting within the epicenter of a timeline-shattering rescue mission. Available from May 28th, 2026 UTC! The time has come to save the heroes and stop the sins of Alchemax!