Most VBC teams find out they have a documentation problem when the audit letter shows up. Usually, that's when it's too late to fix the coding gap, too late to close the care gap, and too late to save the contract. By 2027, prospective risk adjustment, V28 fluency, and audit-ready documentation won't be differentiators. They'll be table stakes. Teams still running retrospective, manual workflows will be the ones explaining themselves to auditors. On September 30, I'm talking with Dana Brandenstein, VP of Provider Enablement at @PriviaHealth, and Dana McCalley, VP of Value-Based Care at @Navina_ai about what separates VBC orgs that are ready for 2027 from the ones that aren't - but still could be! We'll also walk through a self-assessment so you can see where your own org lands. Big thanks to brand partner Navina for partnering with us on this one.

Without the right VBC playbook for 2027... Miss the documentation, fail the audit. Miss the care gap, lose the quality score. Miss both, and you're losing money on the contract. On 9/30, I'm talking with Dana Brandenstein, VP of Provider Enablement at @PriviaHealth, and Dana McCalley, VP of Value-Based Care at @Navina_ai, about what separates the teams that are ready for 2027 from the teams that aren't. We'll discuss: • Why retrospective workflows and delayed follow-up put revenue and audit readiness at risk. • What audit-ready documentation looks like under V28 • How leading organizations stop work from getting lost between teams and tools • Where AI can give your team back time for patients, not paperwork We'll also run through a self-assessment so you can see where your org lands. Join us live or RSVP for the recording.