I am actually glad I work at a crypto company with real revenue and a token. not many people in the our industry can say that 100% of protocol revenue goes to deBridge Reserve fund btw:

This past week, I had conversations with multiple fintech founders. Almost all of them are asking whether they need their own chain. I think it’s obvious why. Robinhood Chain just did nearly $900M in 24H DEX volume across RWAs, tokenized stocks, institutional DeFi, and memecoins. Watching those numbers only adds to the pressure: lose users now to platforms that ship faster, or lose years to the wrong infra bet. Their thinking splits in two ways: - Most understand the resources required to spin up a new chain, so they just tap into existing ecosystems that already have distribution and liquidity. - Some believe owning a chain gives them control over the full stack. Both paths hit the same wall because the market doesn’t live on a single chain. Assets and opportunities span across Solana, Hyperliquid, Ethereum, Base, BNB, and more. Pick any path, and you still need liquidity, settlement, and interoperability to bring money from other chains. And for fintechs, it all comes down to the certainty of outcome. When their user hits send, the funds have to arrive every single time. If it fails, it's their brand that takes the hit, not the infra behind it. So whichever path they choose, what fintechs are really after is the confidence to put their name on every transaction. They want to retain users, win new ones, and own that customer relationship without owning the infrastructure problem. What fintechs need is a product that just delivers the outcome their users want every time.

Stablecoins are becoming the onchain settlement layer In the last 30 days, stablecoin transfers hit a record $1.8T They're already powering payroll, treasury, agents, and neobanks As fintech moves onchain, it needs rails that turn intent into outcomes

A trader lost $2M today swapping ETH for LIT On deBridge, you're protected by default: → What you see is what you get → Bad trades are flagged before you confirm → Power users can disable safeguards for full control

Here's how we find the best route for every user: → Our API queries all available liquidity sources & aggregation APIs → We simulate each option on our in-house infrastructure → Best route is automatically selected for the trade

Hyperliquid Builder Codes are a cheat code for founders They already drive 30%+ of users and unlock: - new revenue stream - a built-in retention funnel - a distribution flywheel Phantom proved the playbook by shipping them last year

Transparency is one of our core product principles Before you confirm a trade, you see: → full fee breakdown → exact amount you’ll receive And after you confirm, the numbers stay the same

Before: Founders picked a chain for their product Now: They treat chains like tools and plug in whatever's best - Solana for UX - Hyperliquid for trading When moving across chains is easy, the whole space is your toolkit

Last week the biggest IPO in history settled onchain, and Hyperliquid didn't blink and that's not just a win for one exchange, but for crypto as a whole if onchain can handle that, nothing's too big for it soon, everyone will get 24/7 access to any asset, from anywhere