Register and share your invite link to earn from video plays and referrals.

𝓚𝓪𝔀𝓱𝓲魔尼
@If_wewin
假装,直到你成功|“memes will continue” ❤️重分享,碎碎念🥷|00年流浪家,2025年“借假修真”,币圈 500U 起手积累筹码,😴白日梦想是5M|在用AI写东西 |工作联系tg @kawhi_lea |所有推文不包含投资建议
Joined March 2018
1.3K Following    6.6K Followers
我觉得很滑稽的是,PUMP明明已经给出了动态费率,例如: 0–420 SOL 市值:Creator 0.30%, 420–1470 SOL:Creator 0.95% 随后逐步下降0.90% → 0.85% → … 且pump具备有CTO功能,手续费可以给CTO团队领取。 而时间过了这么久了,团队居然都不会抄作业。 LONG所有的资产都不具备CTO选项,这意味着现在所有已经成型的代币,除非一开始有阴谋集团做市,否则所有团队的努力都在给DEV和平台打工。 我相信没有一个团队愿意给DEV工作,毕竟没CTO选项,那团队为什么不重开一个同名的标呢? 😀yeon是对的。
Show more
Let me address what I believe is the fundamental issue.Based on the information available to me, the current transaction tax is 1.7%, with 50% going to the creator and 50% to the platform. At the most basic level, this already gives creators a substantial amount in fees. I am not happy with that structure either, but I will set that aside for now.The more serious issue is what happens when a developer launches a token and that token becomes popular. The developer continues to earn fees indefinitely, even if they are no longer actively contributing to the project. Furthermore, those fees are paid in the token itself rather than in ETH or USDG. This naturally creates a continuous stream of potential sell pressure, as the developer has to sell those tokens to realize the fee revenue. So my question is simple: Who exactly is this system designed to benefit?The transaction tax is already higher than on competing platforms. On top of that, developers can abandon their tokens, continue collecting fees, and sell those tokens into the market. In the end, the users trading on the platform and the token holders are the ones who bear the full cost of this structure.
Show more