这里面提到的RAVE, SIREN, MYX, COAI, M, PIPPIN, RIVER,除了PIPPIN一直没怎么关注之外(也可能是最高的FDV也没有超过1B)其他的项目都参与了做空,累计也交了几十万美金的学费,其中SIREN吃了一次跌幅榜之后就撤了,因为链上我发现基本没有怎么动,就一直合约来回画线,需要一直盯着太累了,不适合我;
而其他几个MYX,COAI,RIVER,RAVE虽然基本都跌到了我第一次开空的价格以下(M目前还是在相对的高位),但因为很多基本都在高点仓位太大平空了很大一部分,在下跌过程中也害怕突然反打没有把仓位加回去导致浮亏严重;
一开始我只是希望通过空一些山寨在下跌的时候来对冲主流ETH/SOL的多头风险,但是在选择标的的时候也没有特别认真的研究,只是觉得市值高的标的下跌的空间更大,然后对应的空5-10个,其实这个策略在很多时候 都没啥问题,每一个仓位也基本10%内,但是遇到那种一直猛拉的一开始也不懂 还选择了滚仓做空,想着难道还能涨到100亿不成,事后也为这样的选择付出了巨大的代价(很多高点都是200亿+);
总结这一路的做空经历,我发现散户在做空强庄币几乎没有任何的优势,除非类似Vida那样选择50x的爆仓价,但是2%的仓位哪怕跌50% 对你整体仓位增加是1%,很多人是完全看不上这一点的,我也是到后面才慢慢理解,为什么到最后做空的往往是庄家的燃料而已,因为大部份散户在这里面做的就是高买低卖,当然也不是说坐庄就稳赚不赔,这里面有各种信任、资金成本、筹码结构、交易所的数据盘、以及各种老鼠仓等;
在亏了很多钱之后,我也有一段时间很讨厌这个市场,比如说好的解锁 到底有没有真的解锁,怎么还有那么多人敢在这么高的价格去追,这是一种怎样的心理,难道与庄共舞才是所谓的真相吗,不怕后面也会被收割吗,我也曾试图安慰自己 这钱就当自己买了一辆法拉利,然后车后面不知道丢哪去了,或者说在年轻的时候多犯错,是为了避免以后犯更大的错,还学到了做好仓位管理的重要性,因为我在做空的过程中 也被迫平到了很多多头,事后来看这些也都是杠杆的代价,以及永远要留有一定体量的现金,让自己有东山再起的资本,或者不要把太多执念放在想靠交易翻身
A summary of the RAVE -95% price fluctuation from $26 to $1 over the past 24 hours.
RAVE Timeline: April 18, 2026
7:26 am UTC: I posted a call to action for Binance, Bitget, & Gate to investigate RAVE market manipulation and offered a $10K bounty.
10:56 am UTC: I posted an update increasing the bounty to $25K.
11:18 am UTC: Bitget publicly acknowledged the call to action.
2:08 pm UTC: Binance publicly acknowledged the call to action.
3:06 pm UTC: RaveDAO posted claiming they have no involvement.
4:19 pm UTC: Gate publicly acknowledged the call to action.
In the days leading up, on April 13 & 14, I confronted RaveDAO co-founder Yemu Xu (wildwoomoo) but have yet to receive an answer.
RAVE launched in Dec 2025 on Binance Alpha with a 1B total supply. The addresses below, linked to the initial distribution, control ~95% of the RAVE supply (h/t Mlm):
0x9831156F1a6E506Fca41503590b42F07c2e80f54
0x8Ed6245C3276307E1A9D9Dc872E98A0E770070fd
0x6020656d1EF182173E45D4Fc375BDD5a48c674B0
0x2664cB80a5ee7D8EC05fe7C752dD62E078056E6d
0x2D81F8AeBf3e58A5e638006c9fd8F38C5220ecab
0x31694d761A8e851cFFbCd286aC54D01e5Ce5aFe6
0x0A1F07993a51CcEb4f52CA67765AECeADDA790d7
0xEB74Df8588cFC1C179Df4bd96C0bB8B227B9bE92
0x53d7d52301366DC14E1916b14eFeC1aDD8F3487b
I found suspicious CEX activity in April 2026 tied to RaveDAO team addresses onchain, which potentially contradicts their recent statement:
Bitget
0x2dc20f2180582172f5450c5d71e23fa438a7031b
0xa3a02aeb97fc1737c66f50d07d024799c137891d
0x2d95eb42525e6087e0cb7869f98da6838ed2e743
Gate
0x31711246b05d71e9eda5e38a3abb654020ee3353
Given the supply concentration, the team at minimum knows who is responsible for this price action.
A simple litmus test: $6B in market cap was wiped out on just $52M of 24hr liquidations (h/t CoinGlass). That ratio points to a manipulated and unsustainable valuation.
RAVE is not the only token with manipulation we have seen on major centralized exchanges. It's just the most blatant, reaching a top 15 market cap within 10 days before dropping 95% in hours.
Other projects with highly questionable price action recently include: SIREN, MYX, COAI, M, PIPPIN, RIVER.
Exchanges need faster intervention on manipulation. Detection at scale isn't easy, but each day of delay means retail traders absorb losses while platforms collect fees on the volume. The outcome is the same regardless of intent.
While it's good the exchanges responded, I find it unlikely this activity wasn't spotted internally before I raised it publicly.
I recognize how much this behavior takes from retail traders, and I plan to investigate similar movements in hopes of identifying the responsible parties.
I want to reiterate that I did not take a position. If I had, I would have been liquidated myself. I also could not anticipate if or when the exchanges would comment publicly.
My $25K bounty will remain active since the only DMs received were unverified claims rather than non-public information with supporting evidence as requested.
Show more